interesting shit about the charging consulting fees for your time, good shit
FreeMan said:No, what I am saying is if you refuse to identify yourself as the legal fiction, and then the cop acts on you, he/she will be doing so unlawfully and you can hold them commercially liable. The way to do this is attach a fee schedule to your claim of right, say
$/£10000 an hour for questioning, interrogation, traffic stop etc.
£/$20000 an hour if detained, handcuffed etc,
$/£50000 an hour if assaulted, physically harmed etc,
£/$1000000 if DNA/Fingerprints forced - per infringement
You get the idea... mail this to them and they have so long to respond (3,7,14 days). If they don't rebut your claims point for point within the time period, that now stands as truth in commerce, as silence is agreement. You now have a contract with them providing you followed the correct procedure, and this secures a default administrative judgement. You gave them ample opportunity to rebut your claims and they chose to remain silent -
Legal Maxims -
A matter must be expressed to be resolved.
He who fails to assert his rights has none.
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
He who does not deny, admits.
He who leaves the battlefield first (does not respond to affidavit) loses by default.
He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.
Put your local force on notice, they can't rebut your claims because there's nothing in LAW which says you can't have tints, only in STATUTE. They pull you over, you now have a $10000 commercial injury claim and I suspect it's going to get higher when he asks you to contract. Perfect the process... perfect the claim (aka commercial lien), and they shouldn't give you too much trouble after that. The lien is a powerful tool, and could be quite bad for them depending on how much it is they owe you. No other entity can extract money from them until the lien is settled, and it can only be removed by the claimant or a panel of judges. This is where is hurts them because they are businesses after all, and they are just trying to make money from the service they offered to you (do you want to contract?/what is your name?) You probably agreed/acquiesced or worse still, gave them your vessels title. This is why after all the fun & games they hand you the bill or 'charge' for their troubles.
NiteTiger said:I've just gotta see same case law showing where this has actually worked in real life
yeah that's the thing, the police don't seem to be playing by those rules lol. still i find it most interesting as a subject. it makes a lot of sense and ideally it would work like that and we could all be really free as long as we harm no one, nor encroach on an others freedom.
peace
Am I understanding right that when a LEO asks my identity that I should simply say that I am a free man? If they don't press the issue no problem right...? But if they do press the issue I'm not understanding the process entirely. Say they want to take me "in" for my refusal to name myself (attach myself to the fiction) Do I inform them then of my $10K/hr fee for questioning? I sorta understand the "lein trap" but not how to set and snare it. Could you clarify this better for those of us who aren't fluent in "legal-eze"
Replied to both in the other thread...Oh, no doubt it's some awesome info, and makes for a great esoteric legal discussion. I'm enjoying reading it
I would desperately love to see some cases where this has been applied in reality, my whole approach to life would change!