I would consider it a totally unbiased competition if it was done this way.
Lets say 28 people enter just for easy math. 14 Breeders and 14 Independent Growers. There are 28 judges. Each one get 28 1 gram samples labeled sample #1 to sample #28. They rate each one and fill out the form. Then old pink knows who is who and separates the completed sample score sheets into Breeders and Independent Growers.
But if the judges get the samples and they are labeled Independent Growers samples #1 to #14 and Breeders samples #1 to #14. That will sway the ratings in my opinion. Just like if there were 2 categories called ChemDawgs/OG Kushes sample #1 to #14 and Independent Growers samples #1 to #14. There will be a placebo effect to the ratings of the ChemDawg/OG Kushes.
Hey I really want to be convinced it will be unbiased because I want to enter my finest ounce of my outdoor weed. I have been curing it for 6 months. I been planning on entering for the past year. I want to know how I rate but I don't want to have an unlevel playing field.
thoughts....
Lets say 28 people enter just for easy math. 14 Breeders and 14 Independent Growers. There are 28 judges. Each one get 28 1 gram samples labeled sample #1 to sample #28. They rate each one and fill out the form. Then old pink knows who is who and separates the completed sample score sheets into Breeders and Independent Growers.
But if the judges get the samples and they are labeled Independent Growers samples #1 to #14 and Breeders samples #1 to #14. That will sway the ratings in my opinion. Just like if there were 2 categories called ChemDawgs/OG Kushes sample #1 to #14 and Independent Growers samples #1 to #14. There will be a placebo effect to the ratings of the ChemDawg/OG Kushes.
Hey I really want to be convinced it will be unbiased because I want to enter my finest ounce of my outdoor weed. I have been curing it for 6 months. I been planning on entering for the past year. I want to know how I rate but I don't want to have an unlevel playing field.
thoughts....