I figured the only way to find out the real voltage on each segment was to measure it while it was running.
That turned out to be difficult because the light was beaming me in my face and it was hard to put the probes in there and measure the voltage.
So I taped off of all the segments except the one I was measuring.
I should have maybe put tape on the segment I was trying to measure so I could see but I didn't think of that at the time.
[URL=https://i.postimg.cc/0yL4P0nH/20191021-181215.jpg]View Image[/url]
7.28 volts DC per segment.
I'm building a 120 V full-wave bridge rectifier circuit with voltage regulation. (4 diodes and a capacitor).
[URL=https://i.postimg.cc/9XbyGP4R/Screenshot-2019-10-22-00-36-29.png]View Image[/url]
I need to check the output voltage of my circuit. It'll be a bit less than 120 V due to inefficiencies in the diodes and capacitor.
(waste dissipated as heat).
120÷7.28= ~ 16.5 segments.
I just need to build a few simple parts.
120vac is RMS, or rather 70.7% of the peak. After rectifying, and smoothing, it's this peak you will be left at. Presuming the capacitor can carry you from one to the next, without so much ripple the lights flicker. So you can expect ~150vdc.
Something is off with the led voltages. I can't see what, but it doesn't sit right with me. Even seeing you prove one with 12v, leaves me doubting it's 12v.
Be careful comparing these domestic lamps to strips as 1521lm, because they're not after pulling the dome off. Earlier we looked at the light transmission of these domes, and found the true lm/w figure to be more like 175lm/w, as supported by our own testing, not just the maths. Since then, the new one's have been released, 15% brighter.
It's the generation game. We started here with 17w 1521lm lamps, then 14w 1521lm lamps, and now it's 12w 1521lm lamps. That is 126lm/w through a diffuse dome with perhaps 70% light transmission. Giving us something more like 180lm/w from the leds, which are in turn perhaps 200lm/w leds being pushed too hard to achieve full efficiency. Picked from the same parts catalogue that everyone has access to, with similar budget restraints.
The strips won't be double the output. 126 x 2 is 254, but the strips are 180 at the test current. That is under 50% more, and we havn't took the dome off yet, or over driven the strips. I think the gap will close until we realise it's just leds in different packaging.
Even if you jump ship to known 220lm/w samsung QB's, they are over driven to 180lm/w in most fittings. There is no huge gap between anything, just as long as it's a recent design, that must compete with other brand leaders.
I have these screw-in lamps. Citizen cobs. QB's. Some smart cob junk to, and corn lamps that are a joke. I haven't found the screw-in's to be lacking beside the citizens v6 1212 or Samsung lm301b. But they trash the 100lm/w smart cobs, which there 14w 1521lm/w figure puts them beside. It's that globe.. It really lets them down.
So the drivers self adjust as they get hotter? Does that mean trying to cool the SILs off better will drive them harder, and actually further reduce the life span than making them last longer?
longevity+performance aside, i'll air-cool mine in the future just for a modicum of peace of mind/safety. bit of a pain in the dick, but 100% worth it to me to rest a bit easier.
Simple answer, yes to the driver, no to the LED. The LED is just fine.So the drivers self adjust as they get hotter? Does that mean trying to cool the SILs off better will drive them harder, and actually further reduce the life span than making them last longer?
Thinking about trying one of these out..
https://www.amazon.com/arrival-spectrum-CXB3590-grow-light/dp/B07V3LF2GH
View Image
I don't know dude, single source of heat, single source of light, I'm going to try the opposite.
[URL=https://i.postimg.cc/xj47DnsM/20191112-153227.jpg]View Image[/url]
I just got a tie them off and plug them in.
You have yet to show us a pic. of your grow.
Show us what works for you.
I currently have a cheap 4x cob system I sometimes use for veg, and have also flowered under it. The footprint really only covers 2x2 for flowering, but the canopy penetration and lumen dropoff is much better than lower wattage light sources based on my measurements.