Darth Fader
Member
In Rolling Stone he "clarified" his previous statement that he 'wouldn't go after medical USERS' but never said he wouldn't go after growers or distributers (note: the ogden memo actually stated "individuals", not "users", which could also apply to a grower or caregiver). Same weak non-commital doublespeak here. Lawyers and politicians are particularly skilled in carefully parsing their speech. This time is no different: nearly identical to his medical marijuana statement from his first term, and easily parsed. In short time he'll probably be saying "I never said we wouldn't go after growers and distributers in legal states, we just said we wouldn't go after recreational USERS. Fool me once, shame on you.
The only reason he's letting this slide IMO is because Prohibition is clearly in it's death throes. Public opinion has shifted dramatically and it would be a giant political mistake to spend all that political capital to fight it just to die on that hill. Prohibition is ending whether he likes it or not.
The only reason he's letting this slide IMO is because Prohibition is clearly in it's death throes. Public opinion has shifted dramatically and it would be a giant political mistake to spend all that political capital to fight it just to die on that hill. Prohibition is ending whether he likes it or not.