Forgot about the Crusades did we?
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Milo Yiannopoulos....What an interesting person.
- Thread starter Gypsy Nirvana
- Start date
Forgot about the Crusades did we?
Well I wanted to time stamp it at 11 minutes and 54 seconds but that isn't working.....
https://youtu.be/524DqapwwHQ?t=11m54s
[YOUTUBEIF]524DqapwwHQ?t=11m54s[/YOUTUBEIF]
https://youtu.be/524DqapwwHQ?t=11m54s
[YOUTUBEIF]524DqapwwHQ?t=11m54s[/YOUTUBEIF]
I think that if you were to study nazism, say by reading Mein Kampf, and then had someone interpret the Koran to you, and/or read a good translation of it, you definitely could draw certain parallels between islam and nazism.
They are both murderous ideologies who want/wanted to liquidate the jews, and anyone else who stands in their way, and does not convert to their totalitarian way of thinking/living.
...so, what happened several hundred years ago is relevant today? ...really, lol?
bozo
and ironically we (the US) finance islamic terror by proxy similar to how the US capitalists financed hitler
history always repeats itself
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9371549/Domestic_terrorism_incidents_by_type.png)
Muslims werent doing gnarly shit until Western Powers came and raped their lands of everything ... On top of the West doing all of Israels dirty work... its funny how people think Muslims became aggressive out of nowhere... how would u feel watching USA made weapons wipe out generations of your family and friends in the name of Imperialism ....
All religion is a joke ... but dig deep and you will see Saudis and Zionist are
cousins...hhhmm no wonder head chopping values are promoted in the heart of Islam Land... Just like the real terrorist of the Planet Earth reside in Tel Aviv
House of Al Saud are Jews...fact my Ninjaz.... I hope the Houthis send a cruise missile right into Riyadh.. smart move to put Barbarian Camel Riders in charge of Mecca... help promote extremism
All religion is a joke ... but dig deep and you will see Saudis and Zionist are
cousins...hhhmm no wonder head chopping values are promoted in the heart of Islam Land... Just like the real terrorist of the Planet Earth reside in Tel Aviv
House of Al Saud are Jews...fact my Ninjaz.... I hope the Houthis send a cruise missile right into Riyadh.. smart move to put Barbarian Camel Riders in charge of Mecca... help promote extremism
China is smart to squash all religion... all it does it promote cult like state of mind
Milo is a Zionist insect... if I ever met that scrub face 2 face Id knock his ass out with a Ryu/Ken ALLLLLLL Youuuuuuuuuuuuu Can
Borderliner
Active member
feel sorry for people who had such experience with religion
Mohammed is purported to have slain/beheaded at least 800 souls during his lifetime, and islam conquered a huge chunk of Europe, Africa and Asia many years ago:
Because it is now almost axiomatic for American school textbooks to whitewash all things Islamic, it may be instructive to examine one of those aspects that are regularly distorted: the Muslim conquests.
Few events of history are so well documented and attested to as are these conquests, which commenced soon after the death of the Muslim prophet Muhammad (632) and tapered off circa 750. Large swathes of the Old World—from the India in the east, to Spain in the west—were conquered and consolidated by the sword of Islam during this time, with more after (e.g., the Ottoman conquests).
By the standards of history, the reality of these conquests is unassailable, for history proper concerns itself with primary sources; and the Islamic conquests are thoroughly documented. More importantly, the overwhelming majority of primary source materials we rely on do not come from non-Muslims, who might be accused of bias. Rather, the foremost historians bequeathing to posterity thousands of pages of source materials documenting the Islamic conquests were not only Muslims themselves; they were—and still are—regarded by today's Muslims as pious and trustworthy scholars (generically, the ulema).
Among the most authoritative books devoted to recounting the conquests are: Ibn Ishaq's (d. 767) Sira ("Life of Muhammad"), the oldest biography of Muhammad; Waqidi's (d. circa. 820) Maghazi ("Military Campaigns [of the Prophet]"); Baladhuri's (d. 892) Futuh al-Buldan ("Conquests of the Nations"); and Tabari's (d.923) multi-volume Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, ("History of Prophets and Kings"), which is 40 volumes in the English translation.
Taken together, these accounts (which are primarily based on older accounts—oral and written—tracing back to Muhammad and his successors) provide what was once, and in the Muslim world still is, a famous story: that Allah had perfected religion (Islam) for all humanity; that he commanded his final prophet (Muhammad) and community (Muslims) to spread Islam to the world; and that the latter was/is to accept it either willingly or unwillingly (jihad).
It should be noted that contemporary non-Muslim accounts further validate the facts of the conquests. The writings of the Christian bishop of Jerusalem Sophronius (d.638), for instance, or the chronicles of the Byzantine historian Theophanes (d.758), to name a couple, make clear that Muslims conquered much of what is today called the "Muslim world."
According to the Muslim historical tradition, the majority of non-Muslim peoples of the Old World, not desiring to submit to Islam or its laws (Sharia), fought back, though most were eventually defeated and subsumed.
The first major conquest, renowned for its brutality, occurred in Arabia itself, immediately after Muhammad's death in 632. Many tribes which had only nominally accepted Islam's authority, upon Muhammad's death, figured they could break away; however, Muhammad's successor and first caliph, or successor, Abu Bakr, would have none of that, and proclaimed a jihad against these apostates, known in Arabic as the "Ridda Wars" (or Apostasy Wars). According to the aforementioned historians, tens of thousands of Arabs were put to the sword until their tribes re-submitted to Islam.
The Ridda Wars ended around 634. To keep the Arab Muslims from quarreling, the next caliph, Omar, launched the Muslim conquests: Syria was conquered around 636, Egypt 641, Mesopotamia and the Persian Empire, 650. By the early 8th century, all of north Africa and Spain to the west, and the lands of central Asia and India to the east, were also brought under Islamic suzerainty.
The colorful accounts contained in the Muslim tradition are typified by constant warfare, which normally goes as follows: Muslims go to a new region and offer the inhabitants three choices: 1) submit (i.e., convert) to Islam; 2) live as second-class citizens, or "dhimmis," paying special taxes and accepting several social debilitations; 3) fight to the death.
Centuries later, and partially due to trade, Islam came to be accepted by a few periphery peoples, mostly polytheists and animists, who followed no major religion (e.g., in Indonesia, Somalia), and who currently form the outer fringes of the Islamic world.
Ironically, these exceptions are now portrayed as the rule in America's classrooms: many textbooks suggest or at least imply that most people who converted to Islam did so under no duress, but rather through peaceful contacts with merchants and traders; that they eagerly opted to convert to Islam for the religion's intrinsic appeal, without noting the many debilitations conquered non-Muslims avoided—extra taxes, second-rate social status, enforced humiliation, etc.—by converting to Islam. In fact, in the first century, and due to these debilitations, many conquered peoples sought to convert to Islam only to be rebuffed by the caliphate, which preferred to keep them as subdued—and heavily taxed—subjects, not as Muslim equals.
Meanwhile, as U.S. textbooks equivocate about the Muslim conquests, in the schoolrooms of the Muslim world, the conquests are not only taught as a matter of course, but are glorified: their rapidity and decisiveness are regularly portrayed as evidence that Allah was in fact on the side of the Muslims (and will be again, so long as Muslims uphold their communal duty of waging jihad).
The dissimulation of how Islam was spread in the early centuries contained in Western textbook's mirrors the way the word jihad, once inextricable to the conquests, has also been recast. Whereas the word jihad has throughout the centuries simply meant armed warfare on behalf of Islam, in recent years, American students have been taught the Sufi interpretation of jihad—Sufis make up perhaps one percent of the Islamic world and are often seen as heretics with aberrant interpretations—which portrays jihad as a "spiritual-struggle" against one's vices.
Contrast this definition of jihad with that of an early edition of the venerable Encyclopaedia of Islam. Its opening sentence simply states, "The spread of Islam by arms is a religious duty upon Muslims in general.… Jihad must continue to be done until the whole world is under the rule of Islam.… Islam must completely be made over before the doctrine of jihad [warfare to spread Islam] can be eliminated." Muslim legal manuals written in Arabic are even more explicit.
Likewise, the Islamic conquests narrated in the Muslim histories often mirror the doctrinal obligations laid out in Islam's theological texts—the Koran and Hadith. Muslim historians often justify the actions of the early Islamic invaders by juxtaposing the jihad injunctions found in Islamic scriptures.
It should also be noted that, to Muslims, the Islamic conquests are seen as acts of altruism: they are referred to as futuh, which literally means "openings"—that is, the countries conquered were "opened" for the light of Islam to enter and guide its infidel inhabitants. Thus to Muslims, there is nothing to regret or apologize for concerning the conquests; they are seen as for the good of those who were conquered (i.e., the ancestors of today's Muslims).
In closing, the fact of the Muslim conquests, by all standards of history, is indisputable. Accordingly, just as less than impressive aspects of Western and Christian history, such as the Inquisition or conquest of the Americas, are regularly taught in U.S. textbooks, so too should the Muslim conquests be taught, without apology or fear of being politically incorrect. This is especially so because it concerns history—which has a way of repeating itself when ignored, or worse, whitewashed.
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz
Freedom Center and Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum
https://www.meforum.org/3182/history-muslim-conquests
Green Squall
Well-known member
What About Timothy McVeigh? He was a White American Christian Terrorist..
thats because they're hidden
edit - just seen you got woke an red pilled already lol
Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Stefan Molyneux, David Seaman, Gavin Mcguines etc, etc ,etc
List of Jihadi islamic terror attacks worldwide over the last 30 days:
https://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30
November, 2017
Attacks 120
Killed 1591
Injured 1102
Suicide Blasts 22
Countries 19
https://thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30
November, 2017
Attacks 120
Killed 1591
Injured 1102
Suicide Blasts 22
Countries 19
Those middle east muslims countries have some of the lowest IQ averages in the world. Combine that with no education, add a big helping of indoctrination and you have a proxy army at your disposal. Its who's behind them directing them thats of greatest interest to most people. Some advisories use pawns to attack their enemies Gypsy. Smell the coffee.
IntotheGreen
Active member
Welp, this thread is cancer. Oy.
