G
Guest
Wait, so people that don't smoke weed aren't supposed to be here?
What about people that eat it or vaporize it?
What about people that eat it or vaporize it?
spadedNfaded said:...or fruit loops.
Yep, ya say smoking weed is bad, and automatically you get people jumping on you because they assume you think weed is the devil. People need to stop being so damn close-minded on this site, it's unfortunate, the bias I see here. Wtf man!Harry Gypsna said:well, I reckon any smoke at all is bad for ur lungs...its common sense...its only coz its our beloved herb that some ppl refuse to accept that it could do some harm in the long run-not as bad as baccy but some....
if it was a study that saud smoking oak leaves fucks ur lungs no1 would bat an eye...
we all say how blind the prohibitionists and ppl who espouse their crap are, but isnt someone who refuses to entertain the possibility that their could be some negative effects in some ppl equally blind...
amen to that!blockheader said:Through the years I've been exposed to way too much of this shit.Eggs are good eggs are bad butter is good margarine is bad if you're paying attention it'll drive you nuts!The only common thread in these studies is a persons freedom was never threatened had they chosen to disregard them.Health studies should only be used for peoples benefit if they choose to follow them,not for a social or political agenda like cannabis studies always are.
journies said:1)This isn't cancer, so people in cancer wards have nothing to do with this.
2) I can't even BELIEVE the outright bias that you guys are putting forth, almost automatically ASSUMING that this study is bunk - it's absolutely amazing to me that the pot community is so bias like this, but at the same time I'm not surprised at all.
3) Just because cigs are extremely toxic doesn't devalue any negative effects from smoking weed
4) This is a peer-reviewed journal which means the studies are checked and are not bogus according to the credible scientific community reviewing it.
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/press/pressitem.asp?ref=1593
"About Respirology
Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and experimental respiratory biology and disease and its related fields of research including thoracic surgery, internal medicine, immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology and physiology.
5) If anyone had looked and done some research, easy research, such as I just did, using google, you could easily figure out information about it. Infact here is the study's abstract:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01186.x
Respirology
Volume 13 Issue 1 Page 122-127, January 2008
To cite this article: Su W. HII, Jeff D. C. TAM, Bruce R. THOMPSON, Matthew T. NAUGHTON (2008)
Bullous lung disease due to marijuana
Respirology 13 (1), 122–127.
doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01186.x
Bullous lung disease due to marijuana
* Su W. HII,11Departments of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Monash University and
* Jeff D. C. TAM,22Diagnostic Radiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
* Bruce R. THOMPSON11Departments of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Monash University and AND
* Matthew T. NAUGHTON11Departments of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Monash University and Matthew T. Naughton, Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: [email protected]
*
1Departments of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Monash University and 2Diagnostic Radiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Matthew T. Naughton, Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Bullous lung disease due to marijuana
HII SW, TAM JDC, THOMPSON BR, NAUGHTON MT. Respirology 2008; 13: 122–127
Abstract
Background and objective: In contrast to the well-described effects of tobacco smoking upon pulmonary emphysema, with ~15% of smokers being affected at the age of 65 years, the effects of marijuana smoking are rarely reported and poorly understood.
Methods: We report a series of 10 patients (mean age 41 ± 9 years, eight male, two female), who presented over a period of 12 months to our respiratory unit with new respiratory symptoms, and who admitted to regular chronic marijuana smoking (>1 year continuously). Symptoms on presentation were dyspnoea (n = 4), pneumothorax (n = 4) and chest infection (n = 2).
Results: High-resolution CT revealed asymmetrical, variably sized, emphysematous bullae in the upper and mid zones. However, the CXR was normal in four patients and lung function was normal in five.
Conclusions: Marijuana smoking leads to asymmetrical bullous disease, often in the setting of normal CXR and lung function. In subjects who smoke marijuana, these pathological changes occur at a younger age (approximately 20 years earlier) than in tobacco smokers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There ya go. You can now play scientist and tell us the real scientists have no idea what they are doing, and neither does the community of people that peer review articles for the journal Respirology. In the meantime, I'll actually listen to credible evidence without bias, and understand that smoked marijuana is not some wonder drug that magically has no negative effects.... =/