"Marijuana Smoke Contains Higher Levels Of Certain Toxins Than Tobacco Smoke"

[Crazy Composer]

P.S. I think your studies would be better recieved if they weren't the very first things you posted when you got your membership here.

 

[Guest]

Why didn't those fucking idiot flush there Cannabis LOLOL? These are supposed to be scientist LOL can't even read a tutorial on how to grow meds on trees. Are you related to George Bush??

And um.. whats good with a highly regenerative body with a decent alkaline base?? Cancers good to go in that environment??!!!! I better quit smoking lol

Where you at Scientist? Got some more studies??

 

[Sammet]

Why didn't those fucking idiot flush there Cannabis? These are supposed to be scientist LOL can't even read a tutorial on how to grow meds on trees. Are you related to George Bush??

In the paper it says they obtained their Cannabis from a company in Canada that is liscenced to grow by the government for medical studies. The scientists conducting the study didn't grow it.

 

[Brownpants]

Combustion produces byproducts, whether you smoke weed, tobacco or a potato. The different byproducts present in the smoke depends on the composition of the materials being burned, which is influenced in part by the type of nutrients in the growth medium.

Long story short.....Grow organic and or flush near the end of the grow.

Eating or Vaping is still better for your lungs than smoking.

I'd be more worried about the heavy metals in your backyard from the coal plants than what smoking some cannabis is going to do to you. Or the amount of pesticides in your produce.

Peace

 

[Guest]

In the paper it says they obtained their Cannabis from a company in Canada that is liscenced to grow by the government for medical studies. The scientists conducting the study didn't grow it.

Thats even worse Sammet lol ,Nice find too
Well lets see, the government always goes to the lowest bidder... thats number 1 .. so whoevers doing this study is either a sellout and can't be trusted or doesn't know what the heck there doing when it comes to growing cannabis. I mean everybody and there momma knows cannabis is harmless but you lol.. weird.
I need better results then that btw scientist. I guess officer scientist we're supposed to call you?

Even if the study was good.. all you've proven is that beasters are worse then a cig lol.. we already knew this. Wasted effort. Good bye

 

[Brownpants]

In the paper it says they obtained their Cannabis from a company in Canada that is liscenced to grow by the government for medical studies. The scientists conducting the study didn't grow it.

Isn't that weed grown in an old nickel mine, underground, surrounded by toxic chemicals that were produced by the mining process?

I'd like to see a comparison study between that sludge weed and some nice fresh naturally grown outdoor cannabis.

Not hard to do, just run samples of both types through a GC/MS.

I don't think that study would be government funded though.

 

[MoeBudz^420]

Prairie Plant Systems is that co.'s name - the one that grows in the mine. They were famous here amongst med smokers, and not in a good way...


Peace

 

[PazVerdeRadical]

the "scientist", just because we saw the study was biased from the start, it does not mean we are closed minded.
any thinking person will realize that the purpose of writting a paper to compare which smoke has more toxins is create a matrix of opinion.
because no one can draw any conclusions from the presented study; we now even know the bud used was grown not properly and in an environment that was already pulluted. more over, plants in process of bio-degradation WILL produce ammoniac. ALL organic matter decomposes through ammoniac. study how much ammoniac does a water-melon produces after its shell breaks and the inside gets in touch with the outside. i do not see anyone banning watermelons due to it just yet.

So instead of spreading "scientific" facts to try to scare people, know that we the people are not as stupid as you thought you made us with your inferior education system. We no longer follow cartessian thinking, it is not good and everyone knows this, ask around

Pvr.

 

[The Scientist]

the purpose of writting a paper to compare which smoke has more toxins is create a matrix of opinion.

According to...you

because no one can draw any conclusions from the presented study; we now even know the bud used was grown not properly and in an environment that was already pulluted.

Do we really? Where's the evidence? Or are you just agreeing with what a fellow in the community says? Hmmm..I'd like to see the evidence before I made any claims as you just did

more over, plants in process of bio-degradation WILL produce ammoniac. ALL organic matter decomposes through ammoniac. study how much ammoniac does a water-melon produces after its shell breaks and the inside gets in touch with the outside. i do not see anyone banning watermelons due to it just yet.

ammonia from Bio degredation is due to microorganisms, not combustion
Bio degredation is also a natural process of the ecosystem that we have evolved to live with
We haven't appreciably evolved to adapt to inhaling combusted MJ in the same way we have evolved to withstand trace amounts of ammonia in the air from bio degredation. You're talkin 2 totally different things that are not related.

So instead of spreading "scientific" facts to try to scare people, know that we the people are not as stupid as you thought you made us with your inferior education system. We no longer follow cartessian thinking, it is not good and everyone knows this, ask around
Pvr.

This "inferior education system" that entails "cartessian (sic) thinking" is what has placed humans where we are today in terms of science & its applications that you rely on every single day of your life. =) I love this peer-reviewed process of "cartessian" thinking. It's pretty great in the long run!

Oh, and here's the kicker... you have to answer this question, if you don't, well... we'll know what you are... The Scientist, ARE YOU WORKING WITH, OR AFFILIATED IN ANY WAY WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT?

Just curious because I said you were government before and you never said that you weren't.

O my god. This is too much. No Crazy Composer, I am not a gov't worker, or any other special interest worker. I'm an individual - just like you!

 

[RED145]

O my god. This is too much. No Crazy Composer, I am not a gov't worker, or any other special interest worker. I'm an individual - just like you!

 

[Crazy Composer]

Just like me, eh? Well, I'm thinking you're wrong about that.

A person like me wouldn't go on a taco site and tell everyone tacos are clogging their arteries. A person like me wouldn't spend time at a porn site telling people to slow down or they'll get debilitating callouses, and a person like me would most definitely not spend his time at a pot site telling everyone --over and over again-- that pot is bad for you.

Please post some pics of the pot you're smoking. THAT'S the kind of thing you do around here.

 

[Guest]

pictures of what you smoke ! lets have it

 

[RED145]

As soon as he gets permision from the Seargent,and the keys to the evidence room...I bet we will see a pot shot soon!!!

 

[PazVerdeRadical]

Do we really? Where's the evidence? Or are you just agreeing with what a fellow in the community says? Hmmm..I'd like to see the evidence before I made any claims as you just did

r u stupid or did you miss Sammet's post? he drew the information from the paper you yourself presented. clown.

ammonia from Bio degredation is due to microorganisms, not combustion
Bio degredation is also a natural process of the ecosystem that we have evolved to live with
We haven't appreciably evolved to adapt to inhaling combusted MJ in the same way we have evolved to withstand trace amounts of ammonia in the air from bio degredation. You're talkin 2 totally different things that are not related.

you have low reading comprehension, lets try again: ALL organic matter you eat or smoke or whatever that is no longer attached to its life-giving atmosphere has ammoniac. duh! if you combust any organic matter the smoke WILL contain ammoniac, period.
Humans have been smoking cannabis for hundreds of years; and you know what else? our inmune systems can handle the load. :wink:

This "inferior education system" that entails "cartessian (sic) thinking" is what has placed humans where we are today in terms of science & its applications that you rely on every single day of your life. =) I love this peer-reviewed process of "cartessian" thinking. It's pretty great in the long run!

O my god. This is too much. No Crazy Composer, I am not a gov't worker, or any other special interest worker. I'm an individual - just like you!

So you think today humans are in good shape generally speaking just because they have TV, fridge, cars and x-rays machines?
good for you. keep thinking that way, your children will thank you, not!

 

[Haps]

Smells like a duck over here, what's that about?

Boy, keep your bullshit studies to yourself, we got enough varmits here. I am a fucking scientist, and your stupid study does not even pass scrutiny by stoners, shove it up your wazoo.

You want science? Find me one daily herb smoker, anywhere on the planet with alzheimers, just one, because I can not find any. My study indicates that cannabis use prevents alzheimers. Now piss off.

H