Pepe le skunk
Member
Have seen a difference with UVB light and it's effects. What concerns me is not many recent studies using modern higher output UVB lights. ie. 10% and above. Just an example of questions regarding nm wave lengths for instantance. UVB nm wave length starts around 290 and goes up to 380 or so. Also believe the sweet spot is 312 to 330nm from an article on UVB effects. Will try and find it.
What light bulbs did clark use in his tests? What was the % of UVB from those bulbs and what was the distance. inverse square rule and coverage of flowers would be information needed to render real results.
Was the video from marijuana man all bs? What studies can you use to refuit his findings? Another example of unknown information is was it conducted on clones or seed plants? different seed plant as we all know would produce different numbers if not identical clones.
One last example of measuring THC levels in more recent breeding works, they have been worked to have higher levels of thc from breeding elite strains or higher thc strains into the mix. This also would skew the results of indoor grown strains without UVB present as most use low uvb light like HPS. And glass filters. But the strains where breed to produce high thc content already.
Does it help? I believe there is evidence to prove that in conjunction with indoor light and suplementing UVB full spectrum florecent bulbs there is a mesureable effect on thc resin glands and the other chemicals that reside inside the stem and head of said gland.
Altitude also seems to have an effect as the exposure of UVB increases the higher you go. Was there another reason besides UVB that highland grown cannabis was typically higher in thc than lowland grown cannabis? Or is that a myth?
The effects I have noticed was the high was more trippy with some strains and longer lasting. But that is just what I noticed.
And the glands seem to mature faster.
What light bulbs did clark use in his tests? What was the % of UVB from those bulbs and what was the distance. inverse square rule and coverage of flowers would be information needed to render real results.
Was the video from marijuana man all bs? What studies can you use to refuit his findings? Another example of unknown information is was it conducted on clones or seed plants? different seed plant as we all know would produce different numbers if not identical clones.
One last example of measuring THC levels in more recent breeding works, they have been worked to have higher levels of thc from breeding elite strains or higher thc strains into the mix. This also would skew the results of indoor grown strains without UVB present as most use low uvb light like HPS. And glass filters. But the strains where breed to produce high thc content already.
Does it help? I believe there is evidence to prove that in conjunction with indoor light and suplementing UVB full spectrum florecent bulbs there is a mesureable effect on thc resin glands and the other chemicals that reside inside the stem and head of said gland.
Altitude also seems to have an effect as the exposure of UVB increases the higher you go. Was there another reason besides UVB that highland grown cannabis was typically higher in thc than lowland grown cannabis? Or is that a myth?
The effects I have noticed was the high was more trippy with some strains and longer lasting. But that is just what I noticed.
And the glands seem to mature faster.
