obvious that starving people cannot be fat, there is not enough material being taken in for the body to follow the genetic program. The fact that everyone can be starved to death proves nothing. The fact that 100 people all with the same exact diet and exercise level will have different metabolic rates and different body shapes is much more relevant to the discussion. Surely you don't really think that everyone's bodies operate under the exact same parameters. I never denied that the level of fat can be controlled by food intake, that's kind of a no brainer... just like the fact that if all other things are equal, genetics will cause a variety of body shapes and metabolisms to show up.GMT said:Ignoring the slurs on my genetics knowledge lol, and tip toeing around being banned, if you accept that in extreme situations, it is clear that people will not be fat, then you have to accept that the level of bady fat can be controlled by controlling food intake.
Surely you don't really think that the only difference between fat people's and thin people's bodies is the amount of food they should eat. Surely you don't think that the toned and muscular phisique is the only acceptable body type. Do you? Do you really not think genes affect body shape? If so I don't have any other comments but 'wow'...Although the brain uses up (typically) 80% of the body's calories (given a normal intake). So doubling all physical activity will only burn off 20% more calories than a normal day. Stress will typically burn off a similar additional level of calories, and so I accept that different people in different situations will need to eat differently to maintain the same weight, though that has little to do with genes. The metabolic rates of 2 people, one fatter and one thinner than the normal will show one has a higher rate and one a lower. But the higher rate is not in the thinner person. The body uses up more energy to maintain a larger body than a smaller one, so the metabolic rate needed is lower in the thinner person. There are genetic issues which in some people tell the body that it is never full, but that is very rare, and it is still the level of food eaten that dictates the size of the person.
What is the problem with enhancing one's appearance? Why can people not have that right? What gives anyone the right to insult or look down on someone for enhancing their appearance?But back to make up, I think everyone would agree that in cases of disfigurement, then concealer is totally understandable, and frankly desirable by most. I hadn't considered that situation, I was merely talking about everyday useage by most people, as in a desire not to return to the 80s. But if we are talking about disfigurement and make up solutions, again in disfigurement cases I'm sure all would agree that plastic surgury is acceptable, but what about in terms of pure cosmetic vanity for the masses? Just an enhancement, or over the top? Would any of the ladies out there have a nose job or anything else done? Is that just a part of making oneself look better or is that something else?
Of course, the general consensus is 'less is more'... I agree 100%...
What I disagree with is that make up is a lie... If we're going to go that route, then there are a helluva lot of things most people do to misrepresent themselves when meeting others... I'd be a whole lot more disappointed to find out I'd been dating a complete bitch who was acting nice, that a girl who was covering up a birthmark or a few acne scars... But hey, I guess the outside is more the concern of this thread...
Quite obviously, not very many people want to date a clown... But to call makeup a lie, or to defend someone who is calling women who use a bit of blush liars... Well, that's quite a bit over the top... and for a guy to do it in the women's forum... Well, that makes him a rude asshat in my book...
How can you defend the premise that women wear make-up to fool men into having sex, so they are liars and should throw out their make-up and stop being so fat? Because that is what I was addressing with my statements and what you seemed to be defending in trying to argue.