Captain Red Eye
Active member
You began by asking me questions and now when you can't answer my questions you post your high school senior picture?
You began by asking me questions and now when you can't answer my questions you post your high school senior picture?
so you've moved from a hypothetical about a racist, a black prostitute and a Chinese man, to the racist is the black prostitute. Next, to forced sex and massages, and now to forcing people associate with others?
what question are you asking
I don't really care
The very specific context is that you continue to defend and promote, with all its implications (because I know that your ideology lacks the concept of "social responsibility"):Also, child labor is a contextual thing.
You never really answered the question, because you saw the obvious dilemma and answered the question
in a half-way manner.
The very specific context is that you continue to defend and promote, with all its implications (because I know that your ideology lacks the concept of "social responsibility"):
-Free market of human organs , (even if are from poor people still alive, under "legitimate and legal economic blackmail")...
-"Legitimate and legal economic blackmail"
-Child labour.
post the direct question you're asking and the dilemma that you imagine I see
not all your non sense
and hurry up. this shit is boring
The very specific context is that you continue to defend and promote, with all its implications (because I know that your ideology lacks the concept of "social responsibility"):
-Free market of human organs , (even if are from poor people still alive, under "legitimate and legal economic blackmail")...
-"Legitimate and legal economic blackmail"
-Child labour.
Perhaps a consensus democracy? AKA Haudenosaunee Confederacy.No. You really don't know my ideology regarding social responsibility.
The first thing about social responsibility is not to use offensive force against people. It's wrong.
That is MY underlying principle.
A democracy is based in the idea that offensive force is acceptable. THAT is your ideology. You shirk your social responsibility when you disallow others the right to self-determine peacefully and project it onto me as if I am the one willing to force my ideas on other people. That's a little odd.
You are confused and trying hard to imply a democracy can give rights to a group nobody in the democracy has or had to begin with. That's literally impossible despite many people believing it isn't.
It's easy to prove too.
To find out how, it will cost you some answers to the Luigi questions though. Sorry, free market rules, value for value. no coercion needed.
his near-total lack of empathy is ..."enlightening" to put it mildly. JMHOyour ideology lacks the concept of "social responsibility"):
Are there any true free market economies?Sorry, free market rules, value for value. no coercion needed.
rhetorical, right? "NO"Are there any true free market economies?
No. You really don't know my ideology regarding social responsibility.
The first thing about social responsibility is not to use offensive force against people. It's wrong.
That is MY underlying principle.
A democracy is based in the idea that offensive force is acceptable. THAT is your ideology. You shirk your social responsibility when you disallow others the right to self-determine peacefully and project it onto me as if I am the one willing to force my ideas on other people. That's a little odd.
You are confused and trying hard to imply a democracy can give rights to a group nobody in the democracy has or had to begin with. That's literally impossible despite many people believing it isn't.
It's easy to prove too.
To find out how, it will cost you some answers to the Luigi questions though. Sorry, free market rules, value for value. no coercion needed.
Perhaps a consensus democracy? AKA Haudenosaunee Confederacy.
I'm totally jealous. I did not get the Luigi question.
Are you into Buddhism? Sometimes I'm into Badhism but try not to be. I spent the day with Dali Lama in the early 70s at my friend's house in Vancouver. He was younger then, as was I. We sat in the living room and laughed uncontrollably at the TV. I was smoking (and importing) Oaxacan spears back then. He seemed just as high as me.
I was a little disconcerted by Eltito's (my good uncle) Youtube video of him. That was downright weird.
I don't get out much.Wow... I thought it was public domain, given the huge media impact it had in my country...:
(It is not my intention to cast the shadows that may exist over Buddhist leaders, over Buddhism in general, of course; religions or political ideologies are one thing, and the people who lead or follow them are another thing, of course.)
View attachment 19132075
Asia
Controversy and outrage over a video in which the Dalai Lama kisses a child and asks him to "suck" his tongue
Following the uproar, the Buddhist leader has apologized to the boy and his family and to "everyone" for "the harm caused."
April 10, 2023
Polémica e indignación por un vídeo en el que el Dalái Lama besa a un niño y le pide que "chupe" su lengua
Tras el revuelo generado, el líder budista ha pedido disculpas al niño y a su familia y a "todo el mundo" por "el daño causado".www.elespanol.com
World
The Dalai Lama knew about sexual abuse by Buddhist teachers "since the 1990s"
The Tibetan religious leader acknowledged this in an interview with several Dutch media outlets.
September 15, 2018
El Dalái Lama conocía los abusos sexuales de maestros budistas "desde los años 90"
El líder religioso tibetano lo ha reconocido en una entrevista con varios medios holandeses.www.elespanol.com
AKA Haudenosaunee Confederacy.
Since it seems that you find it difficult or avoid getting into general concepts,
Are there any true free market economies?
his near-total lack of empathy is ..."enlightening" to put it mildly. JMHO