oh yeah.... i luv it....Planting under leds is like ....... with a condom. It can serve a purpose, it can be good sex. But when you take off the condom, you realize how much better it is.
Last edited by a moderator:
oh yeah.... i luv it....Planting under leds is like ....... with a condom. It can serve a purpose, it can be good sex. But when you take off the condom, you realize how much better it is.
I need to correct a point: 70k lux was with boards, soon after I got a 720w bar light and found 60/65k lux (max) with the bar light.I then moved onto 4x 240w lm301 boards and was disappointed with the result, i needed a few crops to adopt some changes and find the sweet spot with light (Ā±70k lux for me)
that's when I started getting above my average crops.
Apart from 50% more power the bar lights would have better spread, the 250w double board lights seems better suited for a 3x2 in terms of spread so i can imagine them being a bit low in the edges. 4 x double boards would make a nice 5x5, maybe turning them down a bit.I need to correct a point: 70k lux was with boards, soon after I got a 720w bar light and found 60/65k lux (max) with the bar light.
I've since noticed something i can't make sense of?
Hitting 60/65k across the footprint is simple with a 720w bar light but 2x250w just can't reach that intensity in the footprint at a similar distance, am I overlooking something?
Cheers
I'm comparing a 720w bar light with a 250w and 300w bar lights, one's a 300w dimmed to 250w but i still expected the footprint intensity be much the same for 500wApart from 50% more power the bar lights would have better spread, the 250w double board lights seems better suited for a 3x2 in terms of spread so i can imagine them being a bit low in the edges. 4 x double boards would make a nice 5x5, maybe turning them down a bit.
karma
when broscience become maistream science. ?
Is it possible to share login? I got 5 on itStill time to sign up:
The Science and Technology of Medical Cannabis Cultivation
This course provides an in depth understanding of how to optimize the growth of crops in the genus Cannabis.caas.usu.edu
Im gonna do round 3 thats for sure. All it can do is help us become better growers. Its not open yet.Still time to sign up:
The Science and Technology of Medical Cannabis Cultivation
This course provides an in depth understanding of how to optimize the growth of crops in the genus Cannabis.caas.usu.edu
Still time to sign up:
The Science and Technology of Medical Cannabis Cultivation
This course provides an in depth understanding of how to optimize the growth of crops in the genus Cannabis.caas.usu.edu
Hoping they open it up soon. This course will change your game no matter who you are. Very smart decision my friend.At times, I want to unsubscribe from this thread because of off-topic posts and useless BS.
No doubt there are many very worthy posts; there is just so much to wade through, so I keep up and disregard the trash.
Thanks, @JKD. I signed up because of your post.
At times, I want to unsubscribe from this thread because of off-topic posts and useless BS.
No doubt there are many very worthy posts; there is just so much to wade through, so I keep up and disregard the trash.
Thanks, @JKD. I signed up because of your post.
But you told us a few pages ago Far Red was useless undesirable!
Isn't it funny how Bugbee talks about increasing leaf size to accelerate photosynthesis but not internodal length . . . Don't worry, I've time stamped it for you. I don't need to remind who's been saying this all along.
If you all followed this and you all understood, explain to me why you use aquaflakes and that your barely 1.8g per watt with everything you know. I'm not taking anything away from you. You shouldn't take the world for idiots either.@growsjoe1 @JKD all this can do is up your game. Whether you have a micro or macro sized grow you will learn very basic and very complex things in this course. Its many different people giving lectures not just Bugbee, they bring in many select pros for specific topics not affiliated with USU as well. Weve actually paid for one on one consulting with one of them personally because their understanding of nutrient delivery is so deep. The lighting section is amazing and explains why Led truly is the way of the future. Theres a reason the most funded facilities are running them.
Let people do their thing. People will accept what you post or not. Move on.
Because that base works the best for my program and convenience. Im lighting 250 sq ft with a MAX of 7200 watts not dimmed. Ive taken down almost 30 lbs nearly 3lbs per fixture. Im no slouch. Again, you grow in a tent. You have a few plants. Talk to me when you can handle an actual decent sized operation. 1.8 grams per watt isnt a bad number. Im limited in how much light i can use. If i had more power id have more fixtures and a higher gram per watt average over the same canopy. Im less concerned w that and more concerned with grams per sq ft. Im hitting 52 grams per sq ft. Which is no slouch either. Commercial facilities with higher average ppfd often get less. Those numbers are trimmed fully manicured units also. Not inflated raw weight like others go by.If you all followed this and you all understood, explain to me why you use aquaflakes and that your barely 1.8g per watt with everything you know. I'm not taking anything away from you. You shouldn't take the world for idiots either.
yes you do better than most commercial facilities. but called my ''theorie'' b.s.Because that base works the best for my program and convenience. Im lighting 250 sq ft with a MAX of 7200 watts not dimmed. Ive taken down almost 30 lbs nearly 3lbs per fixture. Im no slouch. Again, you grow in a tent. You have a few plants. Talk to me when you can handle an actual decent sized operation. 1.8 grams per watt isnt a bad number. Im limited in how much light i can use. If i had more power id have more fixtures and a higher gram per watt average. Im less concerned w that and more concerned with grams per sq ft. Im hitting 52 grams per sq ft. Which is no slouch either. Commercial facilities with higher average ppfd often get less.
Im not sure what ātheorieā youre referring to? What did i argue about? I never went against anything bugbee said. Im confused.the day I will be lead a grow ops , you will never see me again. I'm actually here to get vision nothing else.
and yes you do better than most commercial facilities. but called my ''theorie'' b.s.
The most funded scientist in the world just repeated all what I said for the last 2 month you guys argued with me. Who is bullshiting now?
Ok explain this then.You are rude, you define it. But like a child when told something by an adult, your reply is āno im notā. Ive already told you to grow up so ill just say you will get a lot better feedback and substance from this forum if you come from a place of kindness. This is not meant to be a hot ākitchenā man. We dont need back of house toxicity bullshit. Im all too familiar. This is a place for likeminded people to discuss the intricacies of Leds and how to produce the best quality outcome. You're abrasive in most of your replies. Its gotten you nowhere. When you make a point, back it up with more than just your word. Like where did all of those above figures come from? Can you produce anything to show those figures? If not, just keep it to yourself, because it all sounds like BS.