Joe Biden Thread

[Brother Nature]

Don't know if anyone here has ever worked in the corporate world, but no matter the industry, this is how it works, most people in lucrative positions don't earn them, they just know the right people. It's disheartening, but it's also just how people work, suck it up or stay poor. The cannabis industry is no different, as a lot of us here have learned.

 

[unclefishstick]

The MAGA Truckers Are Threatening to ‘Take Back’ DC’s Black Lives Matter Plaza

“All that paint is coming off that street,” a protester said. “Before I get put in my grave, it’s gonna get tarred and feathered.”​

https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7v4wb/peoples-trucker-convoy-black-lives-matter-plaza


lol.

i can't wait to see the clips of big stupid trucks wrecking when they try to peel out...or a big rig blowing an axle or transmission doing the same thing

 

[NEW ENGLAND]

i can't wait to see the clips of big stupid trucks wrecking when they try to peel out...or a big rig blowing an axle or transmission doing the same thing

Personally I cant wait to see some moron climb under an electric vehicle with a drill to steal the gas,and get electrocuted.Now that would be hilarious

 

[h.h.]

Don't know if anyone here has ever worked in the corporate world, but no matter the industry, this is how it works, most people in lucrative positions don't earn them, they just know the right people. It's disheartening, but it's also just how people work, suck it up or stay poor. The cannabis industry is no different, as a lot of us here have learned.

That’s how it all works. If I have a good employee and they bring in a friend, they’re the ones who suffer if their friend slacks off. The crew takes care of itself. The problem with the system is those outside the community don’t get a chance. It leads to white privilege. If not by design simply by chance. Of course it can go the other way as well but it’s more rare.

 

[CosmicGiggle]

Quid Pro Quo

[Latin, What for what or Something for something.] The mutual consideration that passes between two parties to a contractual agreement, thereby rendering the agreement valid and binding.

In common usage, quid pro quo refers to the giving of one valuable thing for another. Quid pro quo has the same meaning in the law but with varying implications in different contexts.

Quid pro quo, or the exchange of valuable consideration, is required for the formation of a valid contract between individuals who are not merchants. This requirement of mutual consideration, or the exchange of something of value, indicates the sincerity of the parties' intent to adhere to the contract between them.

The term quid pro quo is also used in the contexts of politics and Sexual Harassment. In politics quid quo pro can refer to the use of political office for personal benefit. For instance, an elected official might promise favorable governmental treatment to a person in exchange for something of value. This form of quid pro quo would be a violation of the law. On the federal level, the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 1951 [1994]) makes it a felony for a public official to extort property under color of office. Trading campaign contributions for promises of official actions or inactions are also prohibited under the act.

In the area of sexual harassment, quid pro quo describes a form of sexual blackmail. Quid pro quo sexual harassment is the conditioning of employment benefits on an employee's sub-mission to unwelcome sexual conduct. Title VII of the civil rights act (42 U.S.C.A. § 2000 (e)-2 [1988]) provides a remedy for quid pro quo sexual harassment. Most courts follow the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines and hold that the necessary quid pro quo exists if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment" or if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual" (29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(a)(1)-(2) [1997]).

 

[h.h.]

Quid Pro Quo

[Latin, What for what or Something for something.] The mutual consideration that passes between two parties to a contractual agreement, thereby rendering the agreement valid and binding.

In common usage, quid pro quo refers to the giving of one valuable thing for another. Quid pro quo has the same meaning in the law but with varying implications in different contexts.

Quid pro quo, or the exchange of valuable consideration, is required for the formation of a valid contract between individuals who are not merchants. This requirement of mutual consideration, or the exchange of something of value, indicates the sincerity of the parties' intent to adhere to the contract between them.

The term quid pro quo is also used in the contexts of politics and Sexual Harassment. In politics quid quo pro can refer to the use of political office for personal benefit. For instance, an elected official might promise favorable governmental treatment to a person in exchange for something of value. This form of quid pro quo would be a violation of the law. On the federal level, the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 1951 [1994]) makes it a felony for a public official to extort property under color of office. Trading campaign contributions for promises of official actions or inactions are also prohibited under the act.

In the area of sexual harassment, quid pro quo describes a form of sexual blackmail. Quid pro quo sexual harassment is the conditioning of employment benefits on an employee's sub-mission to unwelcome sexual conduct. Title VII of the civil rights act (42 U.S.C.A. § 2000 (e)-2 [1988]) provides a remedy for quid pro quo sexual harassment. Most courts follow the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines and hold that the necessary quid pro quo exists if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment" or if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual" (29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(a)(1)-(2) [1997]).

Found a dictionary. Cool! What’s it called when you use your contacts to find work?

What’s it called when you sleep with the boss’ kid to get work? Asking for Kim. Traditional values?

 

[h.h.]

Conservatism is a hoax and a lie.

 

[audiohi]

Quid Pro Quo

[Latin, What for what or Something for something.] The mutual consideration that passes between two parties to a contractual agreement, thereby rendering the agreement valid and binding.

In common usage, quid pro quo refers to the giving of one valuable thing for another. Quid pro quo has the same meaning in the law but with varying implications in different contexts.

Quid pro quo, or the exchange of valuable consideration, is required for the formation of a valid contract between individuals who are not merchants. This requirement of mutual consideration, or the exchange of something of value, indicates the sincerity of the parties' intent to adhere to the contract between them.

The term quid pro quo is also used in the contexts of politics and Sexual Harassment. In politics quid quo pro can refer to the use of political office for personal benefit. For instance, an elected official might promise favorable governmental treatment to a person in exchange for something of value. This form of quid pro quo would be a violation of the law. On the federal level, the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 1951 [1994]) makes it a felony for a public official to extort property under color of office. Trading campaign contributions for promises of official actions or inactions are also prohibited under the act.

In the area of sexual harassment, quid pro quo describes a form of sexual blackmail. Quid pro quo sexual harassment is the conditioning of employment benefits on an employee's sub-mission to unwelcome sexual conduct. Title VII of the civil rights act (42 U.S.C.A. § 2000 (e)-2 [1988]) provides a remedy for quid pro quo sexual harassment. Most courts follow the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidelines and hold that the necessary quid pro quo exists if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment" or if submission to unwelcome sexual advances "is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual" (29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(a)(1)-(2) [1997]).

 

[h.h.]

Selective traditional values.

 

[h.h.]

Particularly shocking" - Every single minute, 55 children have fled their country. A Ukrainian child has become a refugee almost every single second since the start of the war.

UNICEF

https://www.unicef.org/press-releas...le-minute-55-children-have-fled-their-country

 

[CosmicGiggle]

lol@ smear, cover-up, ignore, deflection - you can do better!

 

[h.h.]

lol@ smear, cover-up, ignore, deflection - you can do better!

Just trying to keep your thread going seeing as how all the “conservatives” are mostly interested in backing Russia. They’re done with it too. It doesn’t serve their purpose anymore.

 

[CosmicGiggle]

Well it's not "my thread" and what you're really trying to do is bury hunter's laptop and alla the biden grift in it!

 

[audiohi]

Let's see the laptop.

Who cares if it's buried. FOX has had it since the beginning.

Let's see the stuff that's going to bring everyone down.

What's the delay?

 

[h.h.]

Well it's not "my thread" and what you're really trying to do is bury hunter's laptop and alla the biden grift in it!

I could care less about burying the laptop. Hunter may well be a spoiled rich kid as is Donnie jr. As well as the big donut. What I do care is that it’s being used as an excuse for many other atrocities, including the murder of woman and children. That’s the part that you seem to ignore and bury. I personally see millions of refugees as a much more pressing matter . Being covered up with yet another laptop story. That is the real story behind your story. It all ties together.

 

[audiohi]

 

[Volcanna]

It’s the 10% for the big guy tony bobulinski story that should have sunk his presidential run. The fact they pretended it was Russian disinformation so they could get this fool elected is criminal.

 

[Volcanna]

Yeah let’s ignore the literal war zone directly on the other side of our actual border on our continent. Why don’t we save these people from the cartels so Mexicans are safe there?

 

[audiohi]

Yeah let’s ignore the literal war zone directly on the other side of our actual border on our continent. Why don’t we save these people from the cartels so Mexicans are safe there?

We didn't send them enough guns?

 

[Cannavore]

maybe we should stop destablizing south america and installing dictators into these countries so US transnationals can steal their resources, which creates civil wars and refugee crisis... just a thought.