Green Squall
Well-known member
This is a total abuse of power and a big fuck you to the voters.
"During periods when formal sessions are barred, lawmakers can resort to “informals” to get things done.
Informals tend to have sparse attendance and are generally reserved for voting on measures that are noncontroversial, of relatively minor importance, or both. Think bridge names and liquor licenses.
A key reason for that: In an informal session, a measure is not allowed to pass if even a single legislator present voices an objection.
But all that is required for lawmakers to enter informals and pass a measure is to have at least one Republican and at least one Democrat present.
Passing a controversial measure via an informal session has happened before, but it is challenging because it typically requires a lot of behind-the-scenes jockeying."
UPDATED LINK: http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...may-delayed/StlB04ayOcNl8RksKmMwkJ/story.html
Lots of people are pissed off tonight. Even those who voted against legalization.
"During periods when formal sessions are barred, lawmakers can resort to “informals” to get things done.
Informals tend to have sparse attendance and are generally reserved for voting on measures that are noncontroversial, of relatively minor importance, or both. Think bridge names and liquor licenses.
A key reason for that: In an informal session, a measure is not allowed to pass if even a single legislator present voices an objection.
But all that is required for lawmakers to enter informals and pass a measure is to have at least one Republican and at least one Democrat present.
Passing a controversial measure via an informal session has happened before, but it is challenging because it typically requires a lot of behind-the-scenes jockeying."
UPDATED LINK: http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/20...may-delayed/StlB04ayOcNl8RksKmMwkJ/story.html
Lots of people are pissed off tonight. Even those who voted against legalization.
Last edited: