TLoft13
Member
I still have to see even one problem report with Gavita ballasts.I agree. With all the problems I've read about, I would stick to mag fo now.
I still have to see even one problem report with Gavita ballasts.I agree. With all the problems I've read about, I would stick to mag fo now.
Their lights are used for most sportsstadiums in Europe and they are marketleader for horticultural lighting in the Netherlands, the biggest greenhouse growop worldwide.Gavita light systems provide very little if any advantage over basic light systems. The claims made by the manufacturer are mostly nonsense. There have been no major tech advances in grow lighting for some time. You are paying extra for a trend and old tech turned new that may not catch on.
Gavita would be the last brand I'd buy if I were in the market for new lighting.
I have seen ZERO independent testing for these lights. About the only info one can find on them is at their site and the fuck awful monstergardens.
Please post a link to any independent testing that actually confirms these lights have a great or any advantage over basic systems that are in the market for a fraction of the price.
Ballast Can Be Located Up To 65 ft from Lamp
that's pretty cool, can other ballast do that? Besides the galaxy, which is also made by CAP
Ballast Can Be Located Up To 65 ft from Lamp
that's pretty cool, can other ballast do that? Besides the galaxy, which is also made by CAP