-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
:::::::INFOWARS News Thread:::::::
- Thread starter pipeline
- Start date
- Status
https://www.infowars.com/homeland-security-report-lists-liberty-lovers-as-terrorists/
Homeland Security Report Lists ‘Liberty Lovers’ As Terrorists
July 4, 2012 https://www.infowars.com/homeland-security-report-lists-liberty-lovers-as-terrorists/
Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty” deemed domestic threat
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
The DHS stoked controversy last year when it released a series of videos to promote the See Something, Say Something campaign in which almost all of the terrorists portrayed in the PSAs were white Americans.
Homeland Security Report Lists ‘Liberty Lovers’ As Terrorists
July 4, 2012 https://www.infowars.com/homeland-security-report-lists-liberty-lovers-as-terrorists/
Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty” deemed domestic threat
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
A new study funded by the Department of Homeland Security characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.
Entitled Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008 (PDF), the study was produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism at the University of Maryland. The organization was launched with the aid of DHS funding to the tune of $12 million dollars.
While largely omitting Islamic terrorism – the report fails completely to mention the 1993 World Trade Center bombing – the study focuses on Americans who hold beliefs shared by the vast majority of conservatives and libertarians and puts them in the context of radical extremism.
The report takes its definitions from a 2011 study entitled Profiles of Perpetrators of Terrorism, produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, in which the following characteristics are used to identify terrorists.
While largely omitting Islamic terrorism – the report fails completely to mention the 1993 World Trade Center bombing – the study focuses on Americans who hold beliefs shared by the vast majority of conservatives and libertarians and puts them in the context of radical extremism.
The report takes its definitions from a 2011 study entitled Profiles of Perpetrators of Terrorism, produced by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, in which the following characteristics are used to identify terrorists.
– Americans who believe their “way of life” is under attack;
– Americans who are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”;
– People who consider themselves “anti-global” (presumably those who are wary of the loss of American sovereignty);
– Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”;
– Americans who are “reverent of individual liberty”;
– People who “believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”
– Americans who are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”;
– People who consider themselves “anti-global” (presumably those who are wary of the loss of American sovereignty);
– Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”;
– Americans who are “reverent of individual liberty”;
– People who “believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
- {openx:74}
The report also lists people opposed to abortion and “groups that seek to smite the purported enemies of God and other evildoers” as terrorists.
As we have exhaustively documented on numerous occasions, federal authorities and particularly the Department of Homeland Security have been involved in producing a deluge of literature which portrays liberty lovers and small government advocates as terrorists.
The most flagrant example was the infamous 2009 MIAC report, published by the Missouri Information Analysis Center and first revealed by Infowars, which framed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists.
The rush to denounce legitimate political beliefs as thought crimes, or even mundane behaviors, by insinuating they are shared by terrorists, has accelerated in recent months.
Under the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program, the bulk purchase of food is labeled as a potential indication of terrorist activity, as is using cash to pay for a cup of coffee, and showing an interest in web privacy when using the Internet in a public place.
As we have documented on numerous occasions, the federal government routinely characterizes mundane behavior as extremist activity or a potential indicator of terrorist intent. As part of its ‘See Something, Say Something’ campaign, the Department of Homeland Security educates the public that generic activities performed by millions of people every day, including using a video camera, talking to police officers, wearing hoodies, driving vans, writing on a piece of paper, and using a cell phone recording application,” are all potential signs of terrorist activity. As we have exhaustively documented on numerous occasions, federal authorities and particularly the Department of Homeland Security have been involved in producing a deluge of literature which portrays liberty lovers and small government advocates as terrorists.
The most flagrant example was the infamous 2009 MIAC report, published by the Missouri Information Analysis Center and first revealed by Infowars, which framed Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who display bumper stickers, people who own gold, or even people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists.
The rush to denounce legitimate political beliefs as thought crimes, or even mundane behaviors, by insinuating they are shared by terrorists, has accelerated in recent months.
Under the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism program, the bulk purchase of food is labeled as a potential indication of terrorist activity, as is using cash to pay for a cup of coffee, and showing an interest in web privacy when using the Internet in a public place.
The DHS stoked controversy last year when it released a series of videos to promote the See Something, Say Something campaign in which almost all of the terrorists portrayed in the PSAs were white Americans.
Lets Celebrate! 2019: The Battle For Liberty is On!
These are amazing times. I am just overjoyed by the opportunity we have been given to declare Liberty! Be thankful for President Trump fighting for our first amendment constitutional rights!
The globalists have uncloaked! I’ve been waiting for this for so long!
Its time to wake up! Do not allow yourself to be silenced! This is it!
My family asks me not to talk about politics or “religion” even though they claim to be christian and conservative. In reality they are athiest and liberal. Its literally a war going on right now! I have been waiting for this time.
There is a quickening, so everything you do really does matter! Satan knows his time is short, so decide today to live for God. You’re in this whether you like it or not! You are the resistance!
What an incredible time to be alive! I will never give up my liberty!
These are amazing times. I am just overjoyed by the opportunity we have been given to declare Liberty! Be thankful for President Trump fighting for our first amendment constitutional rights!
The globalists have uncloaked! I’ve been waiting for this for so long!
Its time to wake up! Do not allow yourself to be silenced! This is it!
My family asks me not to talk about politics or “religion” even though they claim to be christian and conservative. In reality they are athiest and liberal. Its literally a war going on right now! I have been waiting for this time.
There is a quickening, so everything you do really does matter! Satan knows his time is short, so decide today to live for God. You’re in this whether you like it or not! You are the resistance!
What an incredible time to be alive! I will never give up my liberty!
Can you read Audiohi? Not responding to this distracting NONSENSE!
What part of "Johnson canceled press conference" and "false allegations" do you not understand?
Dig into it, let us know what you think.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...pstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html
EXCLUSIVE: Troubled woman with a history of drug use who claimed that she was assaulted by Donald Trump at a Jeffrey Epstein sex party at age 13 MADE IT ALL UP
Published: 14:53 EDT, 7 November 2016 | Updated: 12:38 EDT, 9 November 2016
1k
View comments
The woman who alleged that Donald Trump raped her at age 13 at one of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's notorious 'sex parties' fabricated the story, DailyMail.com has learned exclusively.
When the civil suit was initially filed last April, Trump's legal team branded the allegations 'disgusting at the highest level' and a 'hoax' clearly framed to 'solicit media attention or, perhaps... simply politically motivated'.
Clinton supporters had seized on the story as a possible knock out blow.
Then, last Wednesday, Katie Johnson suddenly cancelled a packed press conference at which she was set to reveal herself for the first time, saying she was 'too afraid' following a series of 'threats' against her.
On Friday, six months after legal papers were filed, the civil lawsuit was dramatically dropped.
Katie Johnson's shocking allegations first emerged in a lawsuit filed in California in April this year. She claimed she was raped by Donald Trump when she was a 13-year-old in 1994 - but now she has dramatically dropped the case as DailyMail.com learns that her story was not true
Social media erupted with claims that the woman had been paid off by Trump or was so terrified by threats to her life from Trump supporters that she was forced to withdraw her claims.
But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.
The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.
The court papers offered no corroborative evidence that her claims were true.
News that the allegations were dropped dismayed Hillary supporters who had hoped the claims would be the knock out blow for Trump's election campaign - already rocked in recent weeks by a string of sex assault claims.
Thousands of loyal Hillary followers had opened a discussion about the rape claims on Twitter and other social media networks hoping to damage Trump's push for the White House.
The Huffington Post jumped on the bandwagon of anti-Trump sentiment after she made her claims, asking: 'Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?'
+6
When the suit was filed in April, Trump's legal team branded the allegations 'disgusting at the highest level' and a 'hoax' clearly framed to 'solicit media attention or, perhaps... simply politically motivated'
+6
Dropped: Johnson had claimed in court papers that Trump took her virginity, forced her into role-play sex and alleges that he and financier Epstein treated her as a 'sex slave' in the summer in 1994
+6
Johnson had claimed she encountered Trump at parties held by Jeffrey Epstein at his 71st Street townhouse in New York City
+6
+6
Epstein (left in 2008 and right earlier this year) was arrested in 2006 and accused of sexual abuse by 40 different women, with many alleging they were teenagers at the time
But DailyMail.com has been told that elements of what Johnson had claimed crumbled at the last minute.
Her claims can today be exposed as untruthful, the key fact being that Donald Trump was not involved whatsoever.
A source with knowledge of the controversial case told DailyMail.com: 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute.
'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.
'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'
The revelation slaps down any suggestion that Johnson dropped the case thanks to a secret financial settlement with Trump, as has been speculated on social media.
It also clears Trump of any hint of wrong doing in association with the lawsuit.
DailyMail.com interviewed Johnson before the case was dropped.
She had claimed her motivation was to tell her story was to expose Donald Trump to stop him from becoming president.
'We would have a rapist in the White House. I would feel horrified every single day if I stay in this country,' she said, in dramatic terms.
Johnson said her experiences in the summer in 1994 still haunt her today.
'As much as I try to forget about everything that happened, it always affects everything in my life,' she said. 'I mean it affects my relationships, I don't think I've ever had a successful relationship, one that I feel I can trust that person, there's always that mistrust.'
EXCLUSIVE: Troubled woman with a history of drug use who claimed that she was assaulted by Donald Trump at a Jeffrey Epstein sex party at age 13 MADE IT ALL UP
- On Friday, a lawsuit filed against Donald Trump by 'Katie Johnson' was dramatically dropped
- Speculation that the suit was dropped because of threats or a pay-off by Trump went viral
- But DailyMail.com has learned that the claims against Trump were fiction
- 'Katie Johnson's' shocking allegations first emerged in a lawsuit filed in California in April
- She claimed she was lured to a sex party by pedophile Jeffrey Epstein where she was forced into rough role-play sex with presidential candidate
- On Wednesday Johnson suddenly cancelled a press conference at which she was set to reveal herself for the first time
- Before that, she told her story to DailyMail.com
- Clinton supporters had seized on the story as a possible knock out blow
Published: 14:53 EDT, 7 November 2016 | Updated: 12:38 EDT, 9 November 2016
1k
View comments
The woman who alleged that Donald Trump raped her at age 13 at one of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's notorious 'sex parties' fabricated the story, DailyMail.com has learned exclusively.
When the civil suit was initially filed last April, Trump's legal team branded the allegations 'disgusting at the highest level' and a 'hoax' clearly framed to 'solicit media attention or, perhaps... simply politically motivated'.
Clinton supporters had seized on the story as a possible knock out blow.
Then, last Wednesday, Katie Johnson suddenly cancelled a packed press conference at which she was set to reveal herself for the first time, saying she was 'too afraid' following a series of 'threats' against her.
On Friday, six months after legal papers were filed, the civil lawsuit was dramatically dropped.
Katie Johnson's shocking allegations first emerged in a lawsuit filed in California in April this year. She claimed she was raped by Donald Trump when she was a 13-year-old in 1994 - but now she has dramatically dropped the case as DailyMail.com learns that her story was not true
Social media erupted with claims that the woman had been paid off by Trump or was so terrified by threats to her life from Trump supporters that she was forced to withdraw her claims.
But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.
The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.
The court papers offered no corroborative evidence that her claims were true.
News that the allegations were dropped dismayed Hillary supporters who had hoped the claims would be the knock out blow for Trump's election campaign - already rocked in recent weeks by a string of sex assault claims.
Thousands of loyal Hillary followers had opened a discussion about the rape claims on Twitter and other social media networks hoping to damage Trump's push for the White House.
The Huffington Post jumped on the bandwagon of anti-Trump sentiment after she made her claims, asking: 'Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?'
When the suit was filed in April, Trump's legal team branded the allegations 'disgusting at the highest level' and a 'hoax' clearly framed to 'solicit media attention or, perhaps... simply politically motivated'
Dropped: Johnson had claimed in court papers that Trump took her virginity, forced her into role-play sex and alleges that he and financier Epstein treated her as a 'sex slave' in the summer in 1994
Johnson had claimed she encountered Trump at parties held by Jeffrey Epstein at his 71st Street townhouse in New York City
+6
+6
Epstein (left in 2008 and right earlier this year) was arrested in 2006 and accused of sexual abuse by 40 different women, with many alleging they were teenagers at the time
But DailyMail.com has been told that elements of what Johnson had claimed crumbled at the last minute.
Her claims can today be exposed as untruthful, the key fact being that Donald Trump was not involved whatsoever.
A source with knowledge of the controversial case told DailyMail.com: 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute.
'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.
'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'
The revelation slaps down any suggestion that Johnson dropped the case thanks to a secret financial settlement with Trump, as has been speculated on social media.
It also clears Trump of any hint of wrong doing in association with the lawsuit.
DailyMail.com interviewed Johnson before the case was dropped.
She had claimed her motivation was to tell her story was to expose Donald Trump to stop him from becoming president.
'We would have a rapist in the White House. I would feel horrified every single day if I stay in this country,' she said, in dramatic terms.
Johnson said her experiences in the summer in 1994 still haunt her today.
'As much as I try to forget about everything that happened, it always affects everything in my life,' she said. 'I mean it affects my relationships, I don't think I've ever had a successful relationship, one that I feel I can trust that person, there's always that mistrust.'
No source cited by Dailymail, other than “they’ve been told”
Has more of a spin sound emanating from it, what would be the point of withholding a source if it exists?
It also spends a lot of effort claiming trump is vindicated, and it was all lies.
Doesn’t sound like an unbiased news source, extra heavy on the spin though.
Has more of a spin sound emanating from it, what would be the point of withholding a source if it exists?
It also spends a lot of effort claiming trump is vindicated, and it was all lies.
Doesn’t sound like an unbiased news source, extra heavy on the spin though.
Something to watch during this Epstein scandal - is how partisan each different news outlet is towards different sides of the political divide -
White Beard
Active member
True, and instructive of the effect of a ~6-year bed of guilt-by-association between Epstein and Clinton...Acosta is out now because he made a real sweetheart deal with Epstein and Dershowitz - an indefensible deal, though he did try...couldn’t pass the smell test.
Epstein is in play now: there’s too much history, there’s too much outrage on both sides over this, no matter how many wealthy and powerful lifetimes members of the Lolita club there are.
We can’t afford *ANY* coverups of any of it, for *anybody’s* benefit. Rake it all out.
Epstein is in play now: there’s too much history, there’s too much outrage on both sides over this, no matter how many wealthy and powerful lifetimes members of the Lolita club there are.
We can’t afford *ANY* coverups of any of it, for *anybody’s* benefit. Rake it all out.
I love watching both MSNBC and Fox to see what spin each side puts on things, and they always do!
I completely agree. If you fuck with kids, you should go to prison. No protective custody, general population. Take out the trash
TychoMonolyth
Boreal Curing
If someone ever fucked with my kids, I'd erase the whole bloodline.
BREAKING: The U.S. government has extensive evidence that the Turkish government attempted to influence Trump’s 2016 campaign through adviser Michael Flynn
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...2badee-a426-11e9-b8c8-75dae2607e60_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...2badee-a426-11e9-b8c8-75dae2607e60_story.html
- Status
