poking smot
Member
It's a pipe dream.
So what. so is Prop 19. Do you really think the Fed will be cool with it? I don't think so.
It's a pipe dream.
So what. so is Prop 19. Do you really think the Fed will be cool with it? I don't think so.
No Prop 19 is no 'pipe dream'......it is very real and all Californian's of voting age can vote on it this coming November.....
Whether the Fed's are 'cool' with it or not is not the issue......it is quite obvious that the Fed's were not 'cool' with Prop 215 when it came to be voted upon or since......
I don't want the government regulating it because its not their business. Why do they need to REGULATE, CONTROL, AND TAX other than to get their hands in the cookie jar. Just let us grow and smoke and stay the hell out of our lives. I as a CA resident already have what i need and would like to keep it that way.
Sure it is. Hasn't happened yet, so it's a dream. I wouldn't be surprised if lots of people are too stoned to even make it to the polls let alone care to vote. And people who are for the prop that have felonies for pot or other reasons can't even vote. Until it passes, I see it as a pipe dream. And i hope that pipe has blue dream in it.
Anyway i see your point Gypsy, and all the rest of you guys too, but i just wish people wouldn't always run to government for the answers.
Your government regulates and controls most everything already...(what does the F.D.A. do?)..why do you think that they would make an exception for cannabis?.....Oh....in a Utopian world based on some anarchical manifesto we might all be happier.....but..you have to deal with the real world around you that is controlled by your government why?.....because that is their business....
Whoever you vote for the government gets in.....
I have lived in Asia on and off for the past 27 years.....in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Singapore, The Philippines, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Myanmar (Burma).......and it is plain to me that the laws and attitudes towards cannabis that has sent many people to jail (and some to be executed) over cannabis have originated from the USA......
Most all of these countries could not get grants/loans from the IMF to be able to develop unless they changed their historically lax attitudes towards cannabis into making cannabis use, production and distribution crimes with extreemly heavy penalties that many people have since suffered under.......and continue to do so to this day.....
If this Proposition 19 passes it will possibly influence those that can change the laws in these countries to quit victimizing cannabis users and growers and those that wish to supply it.....the same goes for every other country on the planet.......and if it is good for the Californian people and it's economy, then why would it not be good for theirs?
I too wish for utopia, but you are incorrect. The FDA does NOT deal in herbs, supplements, and the like.
In point of fact the FDA has not been authorized to deal with tobacco or nicotine.
Just because the US government runs over peoples rights and liberties does not mean they are morally correct to do so.
This legislation does nothing to promote this community, as many have pointed out it will not cultivate cultivators or breed breeders it will merely establishes government control over an area of our lives that need NO government interference.
Sanctioning minor or major violations of our rights by non growers and non smokers is not prudent.
Patrick Henry said "Give me liberty or give me death." He did not advocate a lesser path such as "Separate But Equal" because compromise on fundamental values is incompatible with living a moral existence.
This proposal is evil, maybe less evil than the current scheme however it does NOT deserve our sanction.
I like you am not a registered voter of CA so I will hold my thoughts and opinions and the Californians will decide.
25 square feet of growing area-- Unless you smoke a gram a month, you cannot do a proper Flower, veg, Mother and Clone area under those constraints--
I understand that, but just because other products are regulated and taxed doesn't mean everything has to be. Thats whats wrong with people these days, everyone needs things to be approved before we can use or do them. I just truly believe that this prop is not what CA needs. We should be fighting for full on legalization with no limits or boundries. We don't need to give the governments (state or fed) any more power over us.
Your government regulates and controls most everything already...(what does the F.D.A. do?)..why do you think that they would make an exception for cannabis?.....Oh....in a Utopian world based on some anarchical manifesto we might all be happier.....but..you have to deal with the real world around you that is controlled by your government why?.....because that is their business....
Whoever you vote for the government gets in.....
I understand that, but just because other products are regulated and taxed doesn't mean everything has to be. Thats whats wrong with people these days, everyone needs things to be approved before we can use or do them. I just truly believe that this prop is not what CA needs. We should be fighting for full on legalization with no limits or boundries. We don't need to give the governments (state or fed) any more power over us.
Not just our government....all government correct? We are well aware the US government is more or less hated around the world....not to be trusted like all governments.
The real world is what you create it to be. Concession and regulation may be a fact of life in our world...but that's only because we've allowed it to be.
When the servant (government) becomes your master....then yup...your dreams of Utopia seem unrealistic. Bending over to government gives it the sense that everything is ok.....and it will continue on doing exactly what it's doing now.
The US government is about weapon deals and drug deals.....that is why we war. There is shit loads of $ in it. As it does not represent my belief system.....I will aid it along as little as possible.
What is pretty obvious as you go through this thread is that the biggest detractors are all commercial growers themselves. Someone who has 20 10' plants in their back yard shoukd really have the wherewithal to save up the 200k for the new growing license. You can NOT assume an anti-commercialization with any amount of credibility with that standpoint. 20 big plants like that... gotta be better than 30 #s there. If you are supplying @ $20 a sack (what can be assumed from your "compassionate" rates) that 2 month harvest would net you 30*$3.2k = $90k 6 times a year... anyone housing $300k a year is 100% commercial. I wish my back yard could be a goldmine too.