TL; DR
So CRISPR?
So CRISPR?
I usually try and keep a cut of whatever most recent male has been used......try.It's time for a progress report on my efforts to essentially create a plant that will grow in a screen 'o green style, without the need to decapitate or crush the main stem of a thriving, juvenile cannabis plant and no reason to use bondage and discipline to tie it down and hinder its growth.
I've been fucking around with both the Type I/Sativa and Type II/Indica dominate phenos of SouthEast Lights to develop a multi-poly-hybrid that will be less prone to botrytis and PM. I trying to do this by recombining the original constituents of NL into a plant that will grow the way I want it to.
Here's a pic of the standard NL pheno that is so consistently reproducible for me:
View attachment 19053648
Here is a pheno of the Type I/Sativa I've been working that is nowhere near as consistent in structure as the NL pheno but it has the branching structure I've been looking for:
View attachment 19053653
Here is the structure of the _one_ that I've been looking for and think I've finally found:
View attachment 19053679
View attachment 19053681
And to illustrate that the plant hasn't been topped, hacked, fimmed or otherwise fucked with to increase yield, check out the main stem structure:
View attachment 19053683
The missing branches are what I used to clone this baby:
View attachment 19053685
I've got 20 fully rooted clones of this plant.
I only wish I still had viable pollen from this plant to backcross it to these clones when they're ready, because I believe that's where the branching/spreading trait originally came from. Unofrtunately, I do not :
View attachment 19053688
I probably won't do any staminate plants until next spring to match up to the plant I'm referring to as "The One", because I want to make sure the cloned offspring are stable and reproducible.
I can't wait to find "Another One" staminate plant that I can mate to "The One" pistillate, just to see what happens.
Hope ya didn't yell at Bubba too much!I usually try and keep a cut of whatever most recent male has been used......try.
Dogs ate my last one the day he got put outside didn't make it one night.
No, I don't use the numbering system like the NL Crew did but I can certainly understand why they did. I'm sure it was a way to quantify the dominance of either Type I/Sativa and Type II/Indica cannabis in the various combinations they tried, when creating the TypeIV/Hybrid. I know NL Seattle Greg suffered from severe PTSD, so the Type II was very important to him, for sleeping/sedation.Do you keep different lines like F6#1-5 F6#6-10? Would be interesting if you could get back some hybrid-effect after crossing both lines back to each other after maybe 3-5 generations of seperation.
Very cool to see somebody do something different.
I just classify the seeds as either Type I, Type II, or Type IV dominant and even at this stage, 8 years after reverse engineering it, there is still considerable phenotypic variation among those three categories.
Yes. This is going to be a generalization because obviously there's exceptions but the Type II are rather large, the biggest of the three groups. The Type IV is the intermediate in size, and probably the most variable. Type I are the smallest and are more gray spotted than brown but the overall colors are not dramatically different between the three groups.Do you see differences in the seeds themselves according to their type?