PPM says 500 PPM and 784 PPM both equal 1.0 EC
@7 or @5
Do you get it or are you just pretending to not get it because you love your E.C.?
Just as accurate....unless you don't understand the difference
PPM says 500 PPM and 784 PPM both equal 1.0 EC
I agree with some extent with freezerboy. BUT within your own garden a ppm will be fine but when u start reading that ppl are using so n so ppms and u wanna follow same plan but the guy didnt say which conversion his ppm meter is?? can get very confusing i know i been there. Now i have a wand that does ppm/EC/tds and CF
A PPM within your own garden learning your plants will serve just as good as an EC meter. Only when trying to follow other ppls nutrient regimes do they become a problem.I'm not saying he shouldnt get a EC i'm just saying a ppm aint uselessWith one EC meter there is no confusion. For some, hydro can be be complicated, why make it more so.
What type of reading are you looking for when looking at PPM's or EC's? What are you using this information for? How are they affected? I guess I'm not sure what PPM's and what EC's are. Parts Per Million, and EC=measuring salt content right?
Thanks for helping with this subject.
It's not "superior equipment"...it's more "consistency in unit of measurement".
OK...first off...NEITHER tells you EXACTLY what's in your water. So, let's be clear about that right from the beginning....
EC, PPM, TDS, they're ALL a guess.
What type of reading are you looking for when looking at PPM's or EC's? What are you using this information for? How are they affected? I guess I'm not sure what PPM's and what EC's are. Parts Per Million, and EC=measuring salt content right?
Thanks for helping with this subject.
I just want everyone to know what FreezerBoy means by that. If a European guy with a .7 conversion talks with an American with a .5 conversion...they don't match up. In that case...the Europeans 700PPM is equal to the Americans 500PPM. It makes a difference.
If you each convert...YOUR...PPM to EC and talk in EC, you WILL match. Both the American 500PPM and the European 700PPM are the same EC... 0.5 after the conversion.
Clearer?
It's not "superior equipment"...it's more "consistency in unit of measurement".
Just talk in EC folks...make it easy for everyone.
You're correct in the first paragraph but, EC, "PPM" and "TDS" are not guesses. EC is a precise measurement, "PPM" and "TDS" are non existent bullshit.
We look for movement of the numbers over time along with those of pH. EC and pH SHOULD move in opposite directions as nutes are acidic. More nutes = more acid = lower pH. For this reason, EC and pH move in opposite directions. EC up, pH down is too rich (drinking water faster than food, food builds up, pH drops) EC down, pH up is too lean (drinking food faster than water, food levels drop, pH climbs)
EC is Electrical Conductivity. "PPM" is NOT parts per million. It's ECx: 500, 640, 650, 700, 720, 768, 784 or a couple other numbers so silly I can't remember them anymore. Plants are illiterate, they don't have a choice, they don't care that "PPM" is bogus nonsense. We however, have a choice. We are not required to choose illiteracy over knowledge. Whatever a "PPM" pen will do, an EC pen will do better, faster, more accurately and will be understood the world over regardless of language.
You've forgotten at least 7 other conversion scales. Hanna users have a 75% chance of being misunderstood between themselves alone as Hanna uses at least four different scales.
A plane that won't fly, a boat that wont float, a match that wont light are all examples of inferior equipment. Any product incapable of it's advertised function is an inferior product. A "PPM" pen is incapable of measuring PPM. It's impossible. It cannot perform it's advertised function. That makes it an inferior product. If you don't like the word inferior, substitute: fraud, rip off, scam, swindle, sham, hoax, fake, snake oil...
I said it before and I say it again, there's no excuse for "PPM" or "TDS" in Hydro when EC is available.