I think when you degrade women, or have somebody with 5-6 names. I dunno how you can x something 5 times on each side and have a strain named all that stuff. It gets weird trying to keep track of this x this x infinite. And I don't wanna have something that offensive, lol some of these strains I'd like to run but I've definatly have to tell my wife a different name for a few strains that I've seen. I just can't believe or understand why somebody would name a strain of weed some of these things.
Back to the topic I'm sorry. That WW in the 90s was definatly good. And like I said the OG(SFV) I really liked. I'd second a fine selection of the older WW and OG(SFV) gene pool. If you found the right WW from 92-99 or so. And the original SFV OG. Some of the better Bluebery from 90s....DP had a good pheno around 99-02....the branchy pheno. I never found anything from Dr S except some great males that I wish I'd collected pollen from outta the first True BB released.
Back to the topic I'm sorry. That WW in the 90s was definatly good. And like I said the OG(SFV) I really liked. I'd second a fine selection of the older WW and OG(SFV) gene pool. If you found the right WW from 92-99 or so. And the original SFV OG. Some of the better Bluebery from 90s....DP had a good pheno around 99-02....the branchy pheno. I never found anything from Dr S except some great males that I wish I'd collected pollen from outta the first True BB released.