Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

[arsekick]

b.s. on it being fake, b.s. on it killing more than a handful (pretty amazing, considering the billions of doses)

lol watever ewe say

I get it noplant21 you believe what you're told no matter what.

I know people that had strokes after the vaccine, and a few that died after it.
You can believe whatever you want, like every leftard cause like a good little leftard should.

Maybe try and think for yourself for once

 

[arsekick]

news of the day - record low maximum

Arctic sea ice sets a record low maximum in 2025

Arctic sea ice extent appears to have reached its annual maximum on March 22, 2025.

nsidc.org

"Please note that this is a preliminary announcement. Changing weather or late-season growth could still increase the Arctic sea ice extent. NSIDC scientists will release a full analysis of the 2024 to 2025 Arctic winter sea ice conditions in early April."

Seeya in April

 

[arsekick]

Still plenty of ice tho, wasn't supposed to be all gone by now ?

 

[arsekick]

Sabine's waking up to the bullshit

 

[arsekick]

• Mendenhall Glacier (Alaska): Exposed a forest dated to 1,000 years ago — during the Medieval Warm Period.
• Lyell Glacier (Yukon): Revealed rooted trees carbon-dated to 2,000+ years ago.
• Swiss Alps (Morteratsch Glacier): Exposed Bronze Age trees dating back 4,000 years.

Must of been warmer in the past with much lower Co2 than today.

But according to the "climate scientists" its never been this warm for 125000 years or so, and never had this much Co2 for 5.3 million years


Its a scam

 

[nepalnt21]

Sabine's waking up to the bullshit

HAHAHAHAHA

right, and I'M the one with the unwavering bias toward my tribe lol

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

 

[igrowone]

Still plenty of ice tho, wasn't supposed to be all gone by now ?

show us the predictions that forecast an ice free arctic
and ice free meant ice free summer which doesn't refer to end of winter, you can bring that back up in September

 

[arsekick]

HAHAHAHAHA

right, and I'M the one with the unwavering bias toward my tribe lol

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

She's from "your" tribe

 

[nepalnt21]

i don't have a tribe, but if i did i wouldn't want any grifters so nope no sabine hapstickler

 

[arsekick]

show us the predictions that forecast an ice free arctic
and ice free meant ice free summer which doesn't refer to end of winter, you can bring that back up in September

Lest see at the end of september then, do you think it will be ice free this summer ?

The last interglacial the Arctic was 4c warmer than the pre-industral era, probably be the same for this one.
Who knows if there was ice free summers then, maybe there was, maybe its natural to be ice free in summer during interglacials at some stage, don't worry it will all freeze over during the next glacial period.

 

[arsekick]

i don't have a tribe, but if i did i wouldn't want any grifters so nope no sabine hapstickler

Your right about her being a grifter, she's also a believer in the "man made" climate change. or was ?

 

[igrowone]

Lest see at the end of september then, do you think it will be ice free this summer ?

The last interglacial the Arctic was 4c warmer than the pre-industral era, probably be the same for this one.
Who knows if there was ice free summers then, maybe there was, maybe its natural to be ice free in summer during interglacials at some stage, don't worry it will all freeze over during the next glacial period.

I say no ice free September this year
but not as confident as I would have been a year ago

 

[buzzmobile]

Who knows if there was ice free summers then, maybe there was, maybe its natural to be ice free in summer during interglacials at some stage, don't worry it will all freeze over during the next glacial period.

Who knows is right. There seems to be a lot of interest in an ice free Arctic. Partnership or a geopollitical competition?

Putin Sends a Clear Warning as Trump Tries to Take Over Greenland

Russian President Vladimir Putin warned western countries Thursday over rising tensions in the Arctic, stating that Russia would strengthen its military presence in the region just as his U.S. counterpart, Donald Trump, seeks to take over Greenland. The Russian president spoke at a policy forum...

www.yahoo.com

In February, the Kremlin floated the idea of a partnership between Russia and the U.S. to develop natural resources north of the Arctic circle. Russia has gradually been reopening its bases in the region to expand its commerce through the Arctic waters.

“It is obvious that the role and importance of the Arctic both for Russia and for the whole world is growing. But unfortunately, geopolitical competition, the struggle for positions in this region, is also intensifying,” Putin said.

 

[Frosty Nuggets]

 

[Cannavore]

 

[nepalnt21]

 

[arsekick]

https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Net-Zero-Averted-Temperature-Increase-2024-06-11.pdf

"Using feedback-free estimates of the warming by increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and observed rates of increase, we estimate that if the United States (U.S.) eliminated net CO2 emissions by the year 2050, this would avert a warming of 0.0084 ◦C (0.015 ◦F), which is below our ability to accurately measure. If the entire world forced net zero CO2 emissions by the year 2050, a warming of only 0.070 ◦C (0.13 ◦F) would be averted. If one assumes that the warming is a factor of 4 larger because of positive feedbacks, as asserted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the warming averted by a net zero U.S. policy would still be very small, 0.034 ◦C (0.061 ◦F). For worldwide net zero emissions by 2050 and the 4-times larger IPCC climate sensitivity, the averted warming would be 0.28 ◦C (0.50 ◦F)."


"As shown by (1), (23), (25) and (26), there appears to be no credible scenario where driving U.S. emissions of CO2 to zero by the year 2050 would avert a temperature increase of more than a few hundredths of a degree centigrade. The immense costs and sacrifices involved would lead to a reduction in warming approximately equal to the measurement uncertainty. It would be hard to find a better example of a policy of all pain and no gain."

 

[Porky82]

https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Net-Zero-Averted-Temperature-Increase-2024-06-11.pdf

"Using feedback-free estimates of the warming by increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and observed rates of increase, we estimate that if the United States (U.S.) eliminated net CO2 emissions by the year 2050, this would avert a warming of 0.0084 ◦C (0.015 ◦F), which is below our ability to accurately measure. If the entire world forced net zero CO2 emissions by the year 2050, a warming of only 0.070 ◦C (0.13 ◦F) would be averted. If one assumes that the warming is a factor of 4 larger because of positive feedbacks, as asserted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the warming averted by a net zero U.S. policy would still be very small, 0.034 ◦C (0.061 ◦F). For worldwide net zero emissions by 2050 and the 4-times larger IPCC climate sensitivity, the averted warming would be 0.28 ◦C (0.50 ◦F)."


"As shown by (1), (23), (25) and (26), there appears to be no credible scenario where driving U.S. emissions of CO2 to zero by the year 2050 would avert a temperature increase of more than a few hundredths of a degree centigrade. The immense costs and sacrifices involved would lead to a reduction in warming approximately equal to the measurement uncertainty. It would be hard to find a better example of a policy of all pain and no gain."

Fuck you just can't help but look like a complete idiot can ya!
The Co2 institute is a US think tank that's chairman was the head of the US petroleum institute.
Look dumb cunt your not dealing with the usual retards in your everyday life who believe your fossil fuel propaganda. Everything you post in this thread is wrong!!

 

[arsekick]

Fuck you just can't help but look like a complete idiot can ya!
The Co2 institute is a US think tank that's chairman was the head of the US petroleum institute.
Look dumb cunt your not dealing with the usual retards in your everyday life who believe your fossil fuel propaganda. Everything you post in this thread is wrong!!

Dispute the artical then.

 

[arsekick]

Fuck you just can't help but look like a complete idiot can ya!
The Co2 institute is a US think tank that's chairman was the head of the US petroleum institute.
Look dumb cunt your not dealing with the usual retards in your everyday life who believe your fossil fuel propaganda. Everything you post in this thread is wrong!!

Whos the chaiman ?


This tnuc below ?

Ph. D. Co-Founder and Chair of the CO2 Coalition, Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus in the Department of Physics at Princeton University, is a specialist in modern optics, optical and radiofrequency spectroscopy of atoms and molecules, radiation propagation in the atmosphere, and spin-polarized atoms and nuclei.