What's new

Have You Been Vaccinated?

Have You Been Vaccinated?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 64 31.1%
  • No!

    Votes: 46 22.3%
  • Soon!

    Votes: 15 7.3%
  • No Way!

    Votes: 67 32.5%
  • I Just Wanna Watch!

    Votes: 14 6.8%

  • Total voters
    206

Captain Red Eye

Active member
See, when you're an inconsiderate dick you don't care about society, or care about other people.

No, being an inconsiderate dick is when you DICK tate your ideas to others, even if they have different ideas and don't approve of yours.

Shouting, "but but society" as a catchall substitute for a principled argument leaves me wondering... What do you mean when you say society?

Also sharing isn't done by forcibly compelling people, that's a form of theft.
Actual charity has no duress attached to it. Sharing and taking are opposing concepts.
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
No, being an inconsiderate dick is when you DICK tate your ideas to others, even if they have different ideas and don't approve of yours.

Shouting, "but but society" as a catchall substitute for a principled argument leaves me wondering... What do you mean when you say society?

Also sharing isn't done by forcibly compelling people, that's a form of theft.
Actual charity has no duress attached to it. Sharing and taking are opposing concepts.

Calling other people you don't know anything about a failure is being an inconsiderate dick.

I was actually speaking to Hiddenjems.

I wasn't presenting a principled argument.

I didn't ask you to be under my feet either.
 

Travis Kelcee

Well-known member
Finally, one should maintain watch for the handiwork of the Social Skeptic in support of the official position. This is a key indicator that the full array of tools of propaganda are being deployed. In order to ascertain this, one merely need read an article by a regular source of such ‘science enthusiasm’ (Shermer, Fidalgo, Novella, etc.). This is the general script this type of professional liar will follow. They will habitually:

  1. Straw man and bucket characterize opposing viewpoints.
  2. Call the opposing voices ‘conspiracy theorists’. Employ copious amounts of snark or untalented humor.
  3. State or imply that what they are about to tell you is obvious to any rational person.
  4. Mention the ‘evidence’ and ‘facts’ often, but rarely if ever actually cite any.
  5. Appeal to a ‘complete’ or ‘total’ lack of evidence for opposing claims.
  6. Appeal to a club researcher, logical fallacy, or an external authority quote.
  7. Cite the subject as having been long debunked and the people therein discredited ‘many times’.
  8. Claim made up harm resulting from opposition voice advocacy or claims.
  9. Claim how these same conspiracy theorists were the cause of some recent horrible event.
  10. Appeal for censorship of these opposing voices, as an expression of science, virtue, and justice.

Examples abound in this thread.


 

Hiddenjems

Well-known member
Holocaust denial is an actual real thing.

I don't think anyone is going to volunteer with the claim, however.
You’ve been calling everyone a racist nazi for so long you forget how real racists and Nazis behave. They’ll deny the holocaust to a survivor and call people slurs to their face.
 
Top