She is an actual scientist and Cindy is a dog. It's a youtube clip not a science paper and using "bollocks" is much kinder than the term I would have used.
Of course there was a pandemic. Are we meant to take you seriously?
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Have You Been Vaccinated?
- Thread starter Tudo
- Start date
Of course there was a pandemic. Are we meant to take you seriously?
GenghisKush
Well-known member
Bud, surely you've personally witnessed actual real-life scientists (plural) who have used the word bollocks.
I'm taking it that you found out the hard way.
not on the streams i've seen, so no.
no, i have not.
Then, as always, I will assume that you have zero idea of what you speak.
Bollocks
i have posted about treatment previously ...
"It turned out that they were pretty frequent," he told Attkisson. "About 1 out of every 800 vaccinated individuals developed some kind of an adverse event." If you’re struggling with ongoing symptoms, find a provider who understands the complexity of the condition and is willing to work with you to find a solution.
In addition to fibrinolytic enzymes and ivermectin, you can also review FLCCC’s I-RECOVER30 protocol, which provides step-by-step instructions on how to treat long COVID and/or reactions from COVID-19 injections.
The Fall-Out From COVID Jabs Continues
Dr. Patrick Whelan, from the department of pediatrics at UCLA School of Medicine, wrote a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020, warning that COVID-19 shots could lead to problems with microvasculature and be disastrous for the public, particularly children. He never heard back from the FDA, but in 2022 published a study with colleagues to follow up on adverse events caused by the shots."It turned out that they were pretty frequent," he told Attkisson. "About 1 out of every 800 vaccinated individuals developed some kind of an adverse event." If you’re struggling with ongoing symptoms, find a provider who understands the complexity of the condition and is willing to work with you to find a solution.
In addition to fibrinolytic enzymes and ivermectin, you can also review FLCCC’s I-RECOVER30 protocol, which provides step-by-step instructions on how to treat long COVID and/or reactions from COVID-19 injections.
Oh you actually think that many people read parroted propaganda?
You are nearly alone in that.
You are nearly alone in that.
more inconvenient truth ....
Nobel Prize Awarded for Modification of mRNA While New Study Found COVID-19 Vaccines Resulted in 17 Million Deaths
Dr. McCullough was a guest on The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson on October 3, 2023, and they covered the ill-advised Nobel prize awarded to Kariko and Weissman for the modification of mRNA making it long-lasting and indestructible in the human body. Ironically this invention has altered synthetic mRNA turning it deadly since there is no way of shutting off production of the lethal Spike protein produced from COVID-19 genetic vaccines. Kariko (14 patents) and Weissman (153 patents) joined a long-list of Nobel laurates who are remembered for inventions that later have injured and killed untold number of humans including Nobel (dynamite), Haber (chlorine gas used in gas chambers), Muller (DDT), and Moniz (prefrontal lobotomy). All of these turned out to be worldwide disasters as is the modern case of mRNA.
The difference between the 2023 award and the rest is that the world knows mRNA has resulted in mass death at the time the winner was chosen. A recent multi-country ecological analysis by Rancourt et al estimated that COVID-19 vaccination has resulted in 17 million excess deaths. While the press release for the mRNA Nobel fantasized about COVID-19 vaccines “saving millions of lives and helping the world bring a close to the pandemic” the published data and >3400 peer reviewed papers describe just the opposite. COVID-19 have resulted in catastrophic injuries, disabilities, and death.
Nobel Prize Awarded for Modification of mRNA While New Study Found COVID-19 Vaccines Resulted in 17 Million Deaths
Dr. McCullough was a guest on The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson on October 3, 2023, and they covered the ill-advised Nobel prize awarded to Kariko and Weissman for the modification of mRNA making it long-lasting and indestructible in the human body. Ironically this invention has altered synthetic mRNA turning it deadly since there is no way of shutting off production of the lethal Spike protein produced from COVID-19 genetic vaccines. Kariko (14 patents) and Weissman (153 patents) joined a long-list of Nobel laurates who are remembered for inventions that later have injured and killed untold number of humans including Nobel (dynamite), Haber (chlorine gas used in gas chambers), Muller (DDT), and Moniz (prefrontal lobotomy). All of these turned out to be worldwide disasters as is the modern case of mRNA.
The difference between the 2023 award and the rest is that the world knows mRNA has resulted in mass death at the time the winner was chosen. A recent multi-country ecological analysis by Rancourt et al estimated that COVID-19 vaccination has resulted in 17 million excess deaths. While the press release for the mRNA Nobel fantasized about COVID-19 vaccines “saving millions of lives and helping the world bring a close to the pandemic” the published data and >3400 peer reviewed papers describe just the opposite. COVID-19 have resulted in catastrophic injuries, disabilities, and death.
from A Midwestern Doctor (on substack)
For a society to function, it requires a collective trust in the society’s institutions. One of the most challenging things for many to come to terms with throughout COVID-19 has been how each institution we trusted to protect us instead pushed a variety of unjustifiable policies and then refused to stop pushing them even as public protest broke out against the harm those policies were creating. I would argue what we saw throughout the pandemic was ultimately a consequence of two things:
In turn, as time has moved forward, and the medical industry has continued to grow (e.g., in 2021, 4.3 trillion dollars went to healthcare, amounting to 18.3% of all spending in the USA), the corruption that sustains it has proliferated throughout our institutions.
Because of the wanton disregard for the science we saw throughout COVID-19, much of the public now believes our institutions are throughly corrupt. However, what is much less understood is the anatomy of that corruption and how deeply it has entwined itself within the Federal government.
For a society to function, it requires a collective trust in the society’s institutions. One of the most challenging things for many to come to terms with throughout COVID-19 has been how each institution we trusted to protect us instead pushed a variety of unjustifiable policies and then refused to stop pushing them even as public protest broke out against the harm those policies were creating. I would argue what we saw throughout the pandemic was ultimately a consequence of two things:
- Medicine is one of the United State’s most lucrative industries (the amount we spend on it has steadily increased each year).
- The practice of medicine is controlled by regulatory bodies who grant monopolies to any party which can complete the arduous tasks needed to earn their seal of approval.
In turn, as time has moved forward, and the medical industry has continued to grow (e.g., in 2021, 4.3 trillion dollars went to healthcare, amounting to 18.3% of all spending in the USA), the corruption that sustains it has proliferated throughout our institutions.
Because of the wanton disregard for the science we saw throughout COVID-19, much of the public now believes our institutions are throughly corrupt. However, what is much less understood is the anatomy of that corruption and how deeply it has entwined itself within the Federal government.
word of advice ... don't listen to grifters like the CDC ...
For example, in 1983, Congress authorized the CDC to accept gifts “made unconditionally…for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service or for the carrying out of any of its functions.” Then in 1992, Congress established The National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention so that CDC could obtain additional funding for its work, or put differently, created a third party for passing tainted money to the CDC.
The CDC Foundation has been accused of egregious conduct since its inception and has received nearly 1 billion dollars from corporate “donors.” The potential for the foundation enabling corruption in turn has been criticized by many, including by a scathing editorial in one of the world’s top medical journals. Many examples of its corruption are documented within this 2019 letter to the CDC.
Note: As of 2019, the CDC also owned 57 vaccine patents and recently spent $4.9 of its $12.0 billion-dollar annual budget buying and distributing vaccines. This may help to explain why the CDC always recommends every vaccine regardless of the evidence arguing against of doing so or how much opposition they receive from the public (and sometimes even their advisors).
For example, in 1983, Congress authorized the CDC to accept gifts “made unconditionally…for the benefit of the [Public Health] Service or for the carrying out of any of its functions.” Then in 1992, Congress established The National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention so that CDC could obtain additional funding for its work, or put differently, created a third party for passing tainted money to the CDC.
The CDC Foundation has been accused of egregious conduct since its inception and has received nearly 1 billion dollars from corporate “donors.” The potential for the foundation enabling corruption in turn has been criticized by many, including by a scathing editorial in one of the world’s top medical journals. Many examples of its corruption are documented within this 2019 letter to the CDC.
Note: As of 2019, the CDC also owned 57 vaccine patents and recently spent $4.9 of its $12.0 billion-dollar annual budget buying and distributing vaccines. This may help to explain why the CDC always recommends every vaccine regardless of the evidence arguing against of doing so or how much opposition they receive from the public (and sometimes even their advisors).
sidebar on how totally fucked medicine in USA is these days ...
Sadly, COVID was not the first time a corrupt committee’s guidelines have had massive consequences for the world. Consider this example from chapter 7 of Doctoring Data:
“The National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) has been tasked by the NIH to develop guidelines [everyone uses] for treating cholesterol levels. Excluding the chair (who was by law prohibited from having financial conflicts of interest), the other 8 members on average were on the payroll of 6 statin manufacturers.
In 2004, NCEP reviewed 5 large statin trials and recommended: “Aggressive LDL lowering for high-risk patients [primary prevention] with lifestyle changes and statins.”
In 2005 a Canadian division of the Cochrane Collaboration [who were not paid off] reviewed 5 large statin trials (3 were the same as NCEP’s, while the other 2 had also reached a positive conclusion for statin therapy). That assessment instead concluded: “Statins have not been shown to provide an overall health benefit in primary prevention trials.””
Note: Statins are widely considered to be one of the most dangerous and ineffective drugs on the market.
lifestyle changes ... oh, they must mean the food pyramid. lol.
Sadly, COVID was not the first time a corrupt committee’s guidelines have had massive consequences for the world. Consider this example from chapter 7 of Doctoring Data:
“The National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) has been tasked by the NIH to develop guidelines [everyone uses] for treating cholesterol levels. Excluding the chair (who was by law prohibited from having financial conflicts of interest), the other 8 members on average were on the payroll of 6 statin manufacturers.
In 2004, NCEP reviewed 5 large statin trials and recommended: “Aggressive LDL lowering for high-risk patients [primary prevention] with lifestyle changes and statins.”
In 2005 a Canadian division of the Cochrane Collaboration [who were not paid off] reviewed 5 large statin trials (3 were the same as NCEP’s, while the other 2 had also reached a positive conclusion for statin therapy). That assessment instead concluded: “Statins have not been shown to provide an overall health benefit in primary prevention trials.””
Note: Statins are widely considered to be one of the most dangerous and ineffective drugs on the market.
lifestyle changes ... oh, they must mean the food pyramid. lol.
Hiddenjems
Well-known member
My my how far the goalpost has moved from these shots keeping you from getting Covid, or giving it to others.
Who knew the support the poor drug companies would get from regular folks. I’m sure they’ll cut you a break on your prescriptions for helping them out.
Who knew the support the poor drug companies would get from regular folks. I’m sure they’ll cut you a break on your prescriptions for helping them out.
GenghisKush
Well-known member
Maybe we just like not having COVID
When you step outside, what color is the sky?
The actual poison is right there in that propaganda.
lol. that propaganda is about propaganda, not poison.
