Kind of like being told to be scared for your life over something indistinguishable from the common cold. What makes one side more right than the other?
yet, here you are!wont be arguing with any of you
jokes are no fun without a punchline...Good to see you are still around Chucky!!
1918-1919 flu season 675.000 deaths and that was only in a few months time.New estimation for that period 1918-1921 is about 50 million deaths.
People died from corona or with corona.In 2020 there wasn't a real protocol for treatment in the hospitals, so the people ended up in the ICU were put on a ventilator, which blew up the lung cells with as result death.
And yes masks are ineffective.There is no reliable research which shows wearing a mask is effective.Wearing a mask will do more harm.
i've had two covid shots, two normal boosters, and the Omicron one as well. also (in the same year) got my two shingles shots, my annual flu shot, and a pneumonia vaccine my doctor advised me to get at my age. how many more before i die? dammit, i don't want to shoot myself, my insurance won't pay off for suicide. and both drugs and guns have such a bad rep these days anyway... i was just joking, i don't HAVE any life insurance.At least Chucky pities me because my magnetic, microchipped, razor bladed, ready-to-clot-but-somehow-hasn't-clotted-yet blood is going to kill me in a couple years
Yeah, I know....Chi13, someone will be along shortly to say "more fake news from the lying Joos..." you know that, right? i think i hear him headed this way...
Yeah, I know....
I have him on ignore too, but I know I won't be able to resist show ignored content. Shucks.
The jab is not a vaccine in any way shape of form and influenza is more deadly than the common covid.TAU study uses smartwatches to measure safety of coronavirus vaccines
NEWS / MEDICINE & HEALTH
Researchers find no evidence of unusual adverse events
December 27th, 2022
SUPPORT THIS RESEARCH
Researchers at Tel Aviv University (TAU) equipped close to 5,000 Israelis with smartwatches and monitored their physiological parameters over two years. Of those monitored, 2,038 received the booster dose of the coronavirus vaccine, allowing the researchers to objectively compare measures before and after the participants took the vaccine and to confirm the safety of the vaccine. From the analysis of this large amount of data, the researchers were able to evaluate the safety of the vaccines subjectively (what the participant reports), objectively (what the watch detects), and clinically (what the doctor diagnoses).
The research was carried out by PhD student Matan Yechezkel under the supervision of Professor Dan Yamin, Head of the Laboratory for Epidemic Research, and led in collaboration with Professsor Erez Shmueli, Head of the Big Data Laboratory, all of TAU’s Fleischman Faculty of Engineering. Other collaborators were Dr. Tal Patalon and Dr. Sivan Gazit, Director and Deputy Director of the Kahn Sagol Maccabi Research & Innovation Center (the research and innovation institute of Maccabi Health Services), as well as Dr. Amichai Painsky and Merav Mofaz of TAU. The results of the research were published on November 18, 2022, in Lancet Respiratory Medicine.
The researchers examined the safety of the booster by analyzing the medical files of 250,000 anonymous members of Maccabi Health Services with the approval of the Helsinki Committee.
“We wanted to test the safety of booster vaccines against the coronavirus,” Professor Yamin explains. “We conducted a large-scale, two-year clinical study during which we equipped 4,698 Israelis with smartwatches. The smartwatches were used to monitor a number of parameters such as heart rate, variation in heart activity, quality of sleep, and number of daily steps taken. In addition, the participants were asked to fill out daily questionnaires about their health status in a customized application that we developed. Finally, we analyzed data on potential unusual events from the medical files of a quarter of a million randomly selected, anonymous, insured members of the Maccabi Health Services.”
Since the medical file contains the date the booster vaccine was administered, researchers were able to compare the condition of the vaccinated patient with his/her baseline condition from 42 days before receiving the vaccine to the condition of 42 days after receiving the vaccine. The data was obtained from the questionnaires, smartwatches, and records of the Maccabi Health Fund.
“We saw clear and significant changes after administration of the vaccine, such as an increase in heart rate compared to the pulse rate measured before vaccination,” Professor Yamin says. “Then we saw a return to the participant’s baseline, i.e., the pulse levels after vaccination returned to their previous levels after six days. Hence, our study confirms the safety of the vaccine. The research also allowed us to compare subjective and objective indicators and medical diagnosis of the same participant who received the first booster and a few months later the second booster. We found no difference in the physiological response recorded by the smart watches or that reported by the participant in the app.”
In fact, the smartwatches were even more precise, the researchers say. “The most surprising finding was that the watches were more sensitive than the people they were monitoring. Many participants reported fatigue, headache, etc. after receiving the vaccine, and after two or three days reported that they felt normal and well. In contrast, from examining their watches, we saw distinct changes in heart rate that continued for several more days. There were also vaccinated participants who did not report any side effects at all and yet definitely experienced physiological changes, based on data from their smartwatches. In other words, we learned that the smartwatches were more sensitive to changes in general feeling than the participants themselves.”
In the medical literature, twenty-five unusual side effects attributed to the coronavirus vaccine were reported, and the researchers paid special attention to look for rare cases of inflammation of the heart muscle (myocarditis) and pericarditis. Professor Yamin and his colleagues checked the frequency of these unusual side effects among a quarter of a million Maccabi members and found no increase in serious incidents of any kind associated with vaccination.
“If the watch reports any minor changes in the muscles, and the participant reports only significant changes he feels, the medical file tells us about unusual events diagnosed by the doctors as well as hospitalizations that may be related to vaccinations, with an emphasis on cardiac events,” Professor Yamin concludes. “We did a comprehensive analysis of all those twenty-five unusual side effects, and we did not see an increase in their incidence among those receiving the booster. We found the vaccine to be safe to use. The smartwatch sensors ‘felt’ that the vaccine was safe, the vaccinee himself reported that the vaccine was safe, and finally, the doctors determined that the vaccine was safe. The results of the study have far-reaching implications regarding objective testing of vaccine safety in the future.”
TAU study uses smartwatches to measure safety of coronavirus vaccines - American Friends of Tel Aviv University
Researchers at Tel Aviv University (TAU) equipped close to 5,000 Israelis with smartwatches and monitored their physiological parameters over two years. Of those monitored, 2,038 received the booster dose of the coronavirus vaccine, allowing the researchers to objectively compare measures before...www.aftau.org
The jab is not a vaccine in any way shape of form and influenza is more deadly than the common covid.
The jab is not a vaccine in any way shape of form and influenza is more deadly than the common covid.