Not a lot of reason to expect anything else imhoso pessimistic.
That ain't gonna happen anytime soon sweetheart.Vote. Out. Incumbents. Period. Just do it.
Whos to say they are not building cases in CO as we speak.
As GS stated, the Feds like their fish to fatten up quite a bit before they pull in their nets and screw everybody. They've likely got their CO players in their sights and at the moment just watching and waiting.
Of course she's right, but again....it ain't gonna happen. Too many morons voting that have absolutely no clue regarding the issues. They're more focused on their sports and reality tv shows than to avail themselves of voting records and whatnot.sea maiden has it right dont vote for anyone who was in office ,all new people period ,dont vote rep or dem just dont re elect anyone ,its or only hope,unless there pro decrimilazation of course
harborside the friendly cannabis cartel. lol
welcome back, gingerAle!!!!!! what were we arguing about? lol.
hope u are in good spirits, and hey, the glass is half empty folks can go fly a kite!
my cup runith over
now for more good news from asa v dea i hope
Do you think they will wait five years?
In 2001, the court ruled, in an opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, that police officers violated a homeowner's privacy when they parked across the street from a home and, without a warrant, used a thermal imaging device to scan the outside of the house for signs of unusual heat inside that might be caused by high-intensity lighting, which is often used to grow marijuana.
You know, I've been chewing on Haag's original assertion that 'the larger the operation the greater the likelihood of criminal activity' and, to me, it really seems that the opposite would be true. It seems to me that it would be far easier for many small dispensaries to, for example, launder money, or not report sales in the first place, than an outfit like Harborside. My reasoning is that *because* Harborside IS so large, they are completely new in the MMJ paradigm. And because they're so new, they're that much more likely to be closely watched, examined, and AUDITED, as they already have been.
So, it seems to me that Haag's dog don't hunt. Her reasoning doesn't wash, it doesn't make sense. They're going after who they can go after irrespective of size because they're laying a groundwork. The IRS is the wild card here, they have powers no other governmental agency has, and they seem to be playing by their own set of rules and for their own agenda, which does not seem to be tied to special interests in quite the same way.