What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

GW Pharma Claims CBD and THC usage specific patents...

dank.frank

ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
ICMag Donor
Veteran
http://www.leafscience.com/2013/12/13/drug-maker-will-soon-hold-patent-thc-cbd-cancer-cures/

"GW Pharmaceuticals announced Wednesday that it has been issued a Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent Office for a patent application involving the use of THC and CBD, the two main chemicals in marijuana, for treating gliomas.
Once a patent application is deemed a genuine invention, the Patent Office sends a Notice of Allowance that outlines the fees involved with final approval.
Specifically, the company provides this description of the patent:
“The subject patent specifically covers a method for treating glioma in a human using a combination of cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) wherein the cannabinoids are in a ratio of from 1:1 to 1:20 (THC:CBD) with the intent to reduce cell viability, inhibit cell growth or reduce tumor volume.”
Filed in 2009, GW’s patent application lists Otsuka Pharmaceutical as a collaborator and initially claimed the invention of the “use of a combination of cannabinoids in the manufacture of a medicament for use in the treatment of cancer.”
However, it’s likely that the application was revised since then to be more specific in its claims, including the ratio of THC to CBD used and the type of cancer treated.
Indeed, the use of cannabis and cannabis-derived chemicals to fight a wide range of cancers has long been suggested by pre-clinical research as well as anecdotal reports.
On the other hand, the first clinical trial to investigate these cancer treatments only began last month, launched by GW Pharmaceuticals for their cannabis drug Sativex.
The trial investigates Sativex in combination with the standard chemotherapy drug temozolomide, and involves 20 patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), an aggressive and rare form of brain cancer.
GW Pharmaceuticals also announced in November that it had begun human trials of a CBD-rich cannabis drug for the treatment of pediatric epilepsy."


http://www.gwpharm.com/GW Pharmaceu...r Use of Cannabinoids in Treating Glioma.aspx


"London, UK, 11 December 2013: GW Pharmaceuticals plc (Nasdaq: GWPH, AIM: GWP, "GW" or the “Company”), a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing novel therapeutics from its proprietary cannabinoid product platform, announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued a Notice of Allowance for U.S. Application Serial Number 12/996,124, a patent which covers the use of cannabinoids for treating glioma. Glioma describes any tumor that arises from the glial tissue of the brain. Glioblastoma, or GBM,
is a particularly aggressive tumor that forms from abnormal growth of glial tissue. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, GBM accounts for approximately 46% of the 22,500 new cases of brain cancer diagnosed in the United States each year. Treatment options are limited and expected survival is a little over one year. GBM is considered a rare disease by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency, or EMA.

The subject patent specifically covers a method for treating glioma in a human using a combination of cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) wherein the cannabinoids are in a ratio of from 1:1 to 1:20 (THC:CBD) with the intent to reduce cell viability, inhibit cell growth or reduce tumor volume. A Notice of Allowance is issued after the USPTO makes a determination that a patent can be granted from an application. The issued patent from this application will provide an exclusivity period until June 2029.

“This Notice of Allowance follows the recent launch of our first human trials in glioma and several years of pre-clinical research in the field,” stated Justin Gover, GW’s Chief Executive Officer. “The treatment of Glioma is part of our exciting new orphan drug program which includes a number of therapeutic targets and demonstrates the flexibility of GW’s proprietary cannabinoid platform in treating a broad range of disease types.”

GW’s intellectual property portfolio includes multiple patent families with issued and/or pending claims directed to plants, plant extracts, extraction technology, pharmaceutical formulations, drug delivery and the therapeutic uses of cannabinoids, as well as plant variety rights, know-how and trade secrets."



dank.Frank
 
Last edited:

dank.frank

ef.yu.se.ka.e.em
ICMag Donor
Veteran
For a list of all patents filed by GW Pharma:

http://www.faqs.org/patents/assignee/gw-pharma-limited/

You'll have to click the link - the list is far to long to copy and paste as it is formatted...

Everyone ready to be criminalized in a whole new way?

We fight for medical cannabis and to legalize this plant for everyone, but all we have done is usher in the new age of prohibition - copyright infringement.

How the government can declare cannabis has no medical value and yet approve such patents is beyond me...

So much for treating ourselves...



dank.Frank
 
Last edited:

supermanlives

Active member
Veteran
its gonna get ugly. there goes the little guy .1:1 to 1:20 don't leave much. so if you made one in same ratios you would be screwed by patent infringement no? black market will always exist ,cheaper meds will be available if ya look.shouldnt be long before mexico jumps in the game
 

wingdings

Member
Veteran
We've already seen how bad corporations are at growing cannabis. i.e. Prairie Plant Systems
They want to make toxic cannabis so they can say, "See, I told you it was bad for you."
 

m314

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I've read some good things about Sativex. The only downside is the high cost and the fact that we can make our own tinctures much cheaper.

It's going to get harder and harder to argue for cannabis prohibition as these studies are completed.
 

leaffan

Member
GW o/a Bayer in Canada got Health Canada approval for Sativex a few years back in a shockingly quick time period. Don't quote me on it, but I think it was within 30 days of application. In Canada all we here about medical marijuana is that tests and studies are required, meanwhile GW gets Sativex rammed through.
It's bullshit.
An even bigger pile of bullshit is the fact that the MS Society of Canada immediately endorsed Sativex and discouraged the use of medical marijuana.
These guys are snakes. This is the world we live in.
 

guineapig

Active member
Veteran
So it is common knowledge that Marinol pills have been sold in the USA for decades now.

Why can't the company that makes Marinol just make a CBD pill?

Also, how can you patent a ratio? I thought only a process or a product could be patented.

Strange days indeed. Most peculiar.

:ying: kind regards from guineapig :ying:
 

m314

Active member
ICMag Donor
Veteran
So it is common knowledge that Marinol pills have been sold in the USA for decades now.

Why can't the company that makes Marinol just make a CBD pill?

Also, how can you patent a ratio? I thought only a process or a product could be patented.

Strange days indeed. Most peculiar.

:ying: kind regards from guineapig :ying:

It's easier to get the right dose with a sublingual spray like Sativex. It kicks in a lot faster than a pill. It's easy to make your own tinctures and pills if you know what you're doing, but the average guy who gets sick won't know how to make them.

From what I read when Sativex was being developed, a 1:1 CBD / THC ratio was preferred by people with MS over pure THC or pure CBD. Maybe they'll find out in the studies which THC / CBD ratios works best with glioma.

I don't know the details about the patent. I'd hope GW Pharmaceuticals only intends to enforce the patents with other pharmaceutical companies. Not medical marijuana patients making their own tinctures or buying tinctures from dispensaries.

The patent situation is a double edged sword in a way. No one will pay for these human studies unless they plan on making a profit. These studies will prove to the world what we all know, that marijuana is an effective treatment for lots of different conditions. I just hope they don't abuse the patents and go after people who want a natural cure.
 

leaffan

Member
McGill University did a case study with marijuana for pain. Favourable results....so of course it gets buried.
GW wants Bayer to sell Sativex in Canada, so they do a 30 day trial study bs something or other, and the rest is history...
It's all bullshit.
 

TickleMyBalls

just don't molest my colas..
Veteran
So it is common knowledge that Marinol pills have been sold in the USA for decades now.

Why can't the company that makes Marinol just make a CBD pill?

Also, how can you patent a ratio? I thought only a process or a product could be patented.

Strange days indeed. Most peculiar.

:ying: kind regards from guineapig :ying:

Sativex is a cannabis extraction. Marinol is synthetic THC, not made from cannabis flowers.
 
J

jaded1

What i don't like about sativex is the fact they are taking a medicine that anyone can make pretty cheaply and charging ridiculous prices for it,over here it's almost impossible to get because of the cost of the treatment.

Really winds me up that they can legally grow for medicine but if were arrested,were told that cannabis has no medical benefits.
The time is soon coming when all the states who have mmj will stop you from growing your own.
 

headband 707

Plant whisperer
Veteran
Perhaps GW Pharma can tell the UN and the rest of the world to FUCK OFF but lets face it these guys are part of the problem and not the solution .. Stay frosty headband 707
 

Morcheeba*

Well-known member
Veteran
ive never dealt w/plant patents but when developing products its wise to do a thorough prior art search to make sure you are not attempting to patent something that has been in the public domain.

making tincture's using specific ratios is not new but for their specific listed type of rare cancer maybe it is.

I don't trust the motives of those wearing suits or where they want the industry to go but w/o an opposing voice the outcome will likely be unfair and skewed to big pharma.

a unified lobbying group that is patient centered & one that will advocate for the patients right to grow is needed more than ever but the movement is too fragmented to put forth a unified voice that can be heard.


peace
 
Top