They had their guess with surface area and opacity but who knows. It is a good question what the margin of error is, probably more than this increase.How could the shatter gain thc-a and D9. Where would it come from. Is it my hunch that the guys doing this test without proper equipment, are showing us the kit they are selling law enforcement for 16K, isn't working properly?
I've seen that report too, the 0.5% per hour is very misleading. It makes it sound that in one day you'll be left with 0% which is ridiculous at best.This is just one experiment and not the "final truth" but it's pretty interesting.
Testing for Truth Part 3: Does Sun Damage Cannabis? - Orange Photonics
Sunlight contains UV light, which has well known destructive properties. Anecdotal reports suggest that the acidic form of THC, THCA, would degrade into Δ9THC (the active form) and then further into CBN. We put some buds to the test to find out.orangephotonics.com
They noticed a loss of 0.5% per hour. And sure 0.5% might not be perceivable but it adds up. That's like half gone after a week assuming the rate stays constant. Well two weeks I guess as the sun doesn't shine at night, and to be fair the rate won't stay constant.
But even half gone would mean the other half is still there. And sure, there are possible benefits as well. For example degradation of chlorophyll to the "golds" (smoother smoke), also recall reading about Moroccan hash getting it's distinct aroma as a result of myrcene reacting to the light when they sun dry their crop, though I guess these may be more light in general not just UV specifically.
Worth discussing both the pros and cons. No need to get upset.
Yeah, more internet nonsense. Just because something is wrote somewhere does not make it fact.How could the shatter gain thc-a and D9. Where would it come from. Is it my hunch that the guys doing this test without proper equipment, are showing us the kit they are selling law enforcement for 16K, isn't working properly?
2 percentage points, not 2%, though. They say a total loss of 20% after 40 hours with their mid-potency weed. Still easy enough to not notice by just adjusting the amount slightly or whatever but worth considering, especially if it can be mitigated with a shade cloth for example.I've seen that report too, the 0.5% per hour is very misleading. It makes it sound that in one day you'll be left with 0% which is ridiculous at best.
The bar graph that they also show on that webpage shows a better picture, and after 40 hours under their light blaster, or over a week of October days, shows a total loss of about 2%, so a couple of days like I was thinking about would again be, not perceptible to "normal" humans.
Yes I should have added percentage points (semantics) ie about 16% down to 14%.2 percentage points, not 2%, though.