What's new
  • ICMag with help from Landrace Warden and The Vault is running a NEW contest in November! You can check it here. Prizes are seeds & forum premium access. Come join in!

Gender dysphoria and the trans movement.

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Your contemptuous disrespectful presentation is all you seem to be able to accomplish.

I don't feel like you are able or willing to learn.

You have a bone to pick, a chip on your shoulder, and one objective.
 

eastcoastjoe

Well-known member
Weak bones, stunted growth, inroads for cancer.

100%. And that is just the physical impacts on the body. the mental health picture is much trickier. Precisely why we should not be allowing young children to assault their bodies with chemistry at such a young age. Especially when they do not have the mental capability to understand the irreversible changes that can, and will happen to their bodies due to their decision.
 

eastcoastjoe

Well-known member
Your contemptuous disrespectful presentation is all you seem to be able to accomplish.

I don't feel like you are able or willing to learn.

You have a bone to pick, a chip on your shoulder, and one objective.

For someone that has the education you claim, it should not be hard for you to agree that medicine is science based. Keeping that in mind, why are we allowing minors to access health treatments that are life altering with zero scientific data ?
There are zero studies, showing the safety for these kinds of treatments on minors ,let alone adults. Mind you, these gender ideologies, cannot even be defended using very basic biology.
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Banning freedom is the wrong direction. Trusting informed parents to act in the best interests of their children is far more preferable to legislating morality.

There's a faction of folks who are completely disgusted by, and opposed to, the liberty trans people express.

It's a slippery slope passing laws to limit the freedom afforded to the people... no matter your personal beliefs.

The next step is to assert that the mental health of the children would be damaged by gay people...

Then probably black and brown people...

Or Jews...

Countries can fall apart like that.

Our freedom is far more precious than fear and hate.
 

eastcoastjoe

Well-known member
Banning freedom is the wrong direction. Trusting informed parents to act in the best interests of their children is far more preferable to legislating morality.

There's a faction of folks who are completely disgusted by, and opposed to, the liberty trans people express.

It's a slippery slope passing laws to limit the freedom afforded to the people... no matter your personal beliefs.

The next step is to assert that the mental health of the children would be damaged by gay people...

Then probably black and brown people...

Or Jews...

Countries can fall apart like that.

Our freedom is far more precious than fear and hate.

Someone needs to protect our youth. It surely won’t be people like you. How come you won’t talk about the lack of research on the medical effects these drugs can have ? Or, you won’t even acknowledge the possible negative effects these drugs can have ?
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
Constantly contradicting yourself.

Those points are all in line with one another.

Someone needs to protect our youth. It surely won’t be people like you.

I'm sure that you're sure.

How come you won’t talk about the lack of research on the medical effects these drugs can have ?

Because you are sure that I know nothing. I am acutely aware of a lack of research data. If I gave you any credence towards an objective conversation, I would probably pursue such.

Or, you won’t even acknowledge the possible negative effects these drugs can have ?

I will acknowledge them, you are repeatedly accusing me of something of which I am not guilty.
 

eastcoastjoe

Well-known member
Those points are all in line with one another.



I'm sure that you're sure.



Because you are sure that I know nothing. I am acutely aware of a lack of research data. If I gave you any credence towards an objective conversation, I would probably pursue such.



I will acknowledge them, you are repeatedly accusing me of something of which I am not guilty.

In one breath, you say, kids should have the freedom to do as they choose t in regards to gender care. But I am when it suits your argument, you say parents should have the right to choose for their kid. So which one is it? See, you can’t have it both ways.
 

mean mr.mustard

I Pass Satellites
Veteran
In one breath, you say, kids should have the freedom to do as they choose t in regards to gender care. But I am when it suits your argument, you say parents should have the right to choose for their kid. So which one is it? See, you can’t have it both ways.

What you are missing this time is my prerequisite of parental consent.

I spent pages with you on this.

I quit.

You're far too dense.
 

eastcoastjoe

Well-known member
Those points are all in line with one another.



I'm sure that you're sure.



Because you are sure that I know nothing. I am acutely aware of a lack of research data. If I gave you any credence towards an objective conversation, I would probably pursue such.



I will acknowledge them, you are repeatedly accusing me of something of which I am not guilty.

Then, how come you don’t answer the question? Someone with your education knows exactly what those types of drugs can do to people. But it doesn’t suit your argument, so you omit that part or completely dodged the question.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top