R
Every time I start thinking that maybe Darwin was wrong, some douchebag like this guy proves natural selection may actually exist
people can claim non-binary, transgender, or whatever. still, please tell me how this helps tax payers/citizens in new york?
but as far as biology is concerned... people like plants, there are only two genders. fact.
gender "x" what the fu*k is that? at birth you are classified objectively. realistically.
you should not be able to do that with children. you grow up want change your identity. fine.
i see no problem with an adult changing any status to suit their social & actual reality.
how can politics redefine biology, a hard science, with such an amorphous concept?
james woods you're my hero.
I don't know that Biology is a hard science. There's a lot of wiggle room in life, not so much in stuff like physics and chemistry. maybe at the atomic level but not so much in the macro world.
The notion of gender in plants and in animals is quite amorphous. many plants are male, female and both at various times.
Even humans have examples of late transformation from one physical expression of gender (female external genitalia) to the other at the time of puberty.
There are examples of people with a male chromosomal makeup who look female due to a defect in the ability to respond to testosterone. The actresses Kim Novack and Jamie Lee Curtis have both been rumored to have that syndrome.