Just an observation...
I don't know if I believe the story to start with..not as reported anyway.
I also don't care much for ebay or paypal. I don't do business with ebay, but paypal has some very questionable practices.
If the feds mandated a book ban, there is no need for discussion, as it will eventually be rectified in the courts.
But let me add this...in my humble opinion, had this story popped up two years ago, these posts would be FULL of George Bush. I would bet my eye teeth that the majority of posters in this thread would make a GW comment. Yet, I hear very little to nothing about Obama orchestrating this fiasco.
Hmmm....
xfargox, I think that you will find that about half of the people get pissed off at what the other half does or doesn't do. What pissed you off about Bush, such as the Patriot Act, that was put in place to protect us from an enemy during a time of war, and hasn't infringed on your rights one bit, may not piss me off...not near as bad as it pisses me off that folks threw around vile and baseless charges at George Bush. See there are two sides to everything. Many only see they're side, which is glossed often by their perception of things.
Take for example your perception of this place. I didn't read anything about it being a bastion of liberalism. And I bet you would be surprised by just how many "conservative" people are here enjoying this place and all it's about.
And I think that you may also find that there are some very intelligent people here. From all walks of life, including professionals. But I understand the perception of this being a den full of stoners. lol....
Perceptions often suck.
I am of firm belief that if a person does consider themselves to be on the side of decriminalizing mj, then they have no choice but to subscribe to a conservative doctrine.
Thinking that liberal means allowing more freedom is, well, it's mostly a fucked up perception at best, and not in line with reality.
It was installed at the very start of financial woes, just after the Clinton recession had begun. But the nation, even during a time of war prospered for several years afterward. And how many attacks have we experienced since the Patriot Act was enacted?1. Financial Issues - It installed a whole new branch of government. (I don't have a $ fig. but I think we can all agree it's more than a wheelbarrow full of $). This it a tremendous burden at a time when we are literally on the brink of collapse.
The only "police state" anyone experienced was past the gate at an airport. The reports that these blogs give out to back up our rights being violated by the Patriot Act, are actually reports of the acts of individuals, acting on their own, and not on behalf of the Patriot Act.2. Safety - Would you really say you feel safer since the Patriot Act? Personally I have more fear of a police state that has no respect for the law they enforce. By their own reports they have convicted many in their own ranks
Many of the provision of the act were made with sunset clauses, meaning they knew this wasn't something we wanted to keep, and much of the act has/had expiration dates attached. And "someone" already has started challenging the act, most of which are suing on principle, rather than showing damages.3. Constitutionality - It absolutely lays waste to the Bill Of Rights, when they say they can strip people of their rights. But they're doing it while they can get away with it. Someone has to get this before the Supreme Court. Law Enforcement wasn't designed to go corporate.
It was installed at the very start of financial woes, just after the Clinton recession had begun. But the nation, even during a time of war prospered for several years afterward. And how many attacks have we experienced since the Patriot Act was enacted?
The only "police state" anyone experienced was past the gate at an airport. The reports that these blogs give out to back up our rights being violated by the Patriot Act, are actually reports of the acts of individuals, acting on their own, and not on behalf of the Patriot Act.
Many of the provision of the act were made with sunset clauses, meaning they knew this wasn't something we wanted to keep, and much of the act has/had expiration dates attached. And "someone" already has started challenging the act, most of which are suing on principle, rather than showing damages.
Take for example your perception of this place. I didn't read anything about it being a bastion of liberalism. And I bet you would be surprised by just how many "conservative" people are here enjoying this place and all it's about.
xfargox, I think that you will find that about half of the people get pissed off at what the other half does or doesn't do. What pissed you off about Bush, such as the Patriot Act, that was put in place to protect us from an enemy during a time of war, and hasn't infringed on your rights one bit, may not piss me off...not near as bad as it pisses me off that folks threw around vile and baseless charges at George Bush. See there are two sides to everything. Many only see they're side, which is glossed often by their perception of things.
Take for example your perception of this place. I didn't read anything about it being a bastion of liberalism. And I bet you would be surprised by just how many "conservative" people are here enjoying this place and all it's about.
And I think that you may also find that there are some very intelligent people here. From all walks of life, including professionals. But I understand the perception of this being a den full of stoners. lol....
Perceptions often suck.
I am of firm belief that if a person does consider themselves to be on the side of decriminalizing mj, then they have no choice but to subscribe to a conservative doctrine.
Thinking that liberal means allowing more freedom is, well, it's mostly a fucked up perception at best, and not in line with reality.
Delighted to see those who would boycott are ahead in the poll!