saw that comin' from a mile away......
What a fucking idiot! How can putting the drug trade in the hands of criminals help keep california safe? Make it legal, eliminate violence, theft and other crimes related to drugs.
The feds sure have been pushing their luck lately...bailouts, mandatory health ins, now going after a state who's people have decided that they would like to enjoy one of natures bounty... I didn't see "banning Gods creatures" anywhere in the Constitution under responsibilities of the federal government.
In fact, it seems to me that they DON'T do what the Constitution charges them with...but they sure do a lot of what isn't their responsibility.
Fucking "general welfare" clause...as bad as "a corporation is an individual...a "person"...with all the legal rights thereof". The day I learned that...was the day of my epiphany! It's ALL fucking rigged. I guess that day SHOULD have been the day I realized they lied about Santa Claus. They're both about as hard to figure out. I guess I'm a little slow a some things.
This is the problem with government...they're always trying to tell you how to live.
What does give the feds the right to ban a plant? What's the constitutionality of that? I've never seen any reasoning giving the federal government the power to ban living things...non dangerous living things. Yes, I understand why I can't have a grizzly bear in my backyard...but a plant? I swear, I'll grow one that doesn't stink...like skunk.
I've asked before...where is the SCOTUS on this? Why can't a free person of sane mind enjoy a recreational buzz? You let me have beer and wine. You let me do shots! But I can't smoke a joint?
It should be argued as cruel and unusual punishment, not befitting the danger to society. Come on, growing a plant is worth 5 years? At $50,000 a year...$250,000 spent to "punish" someone for growing a harmless plant. If you don't smoke it, it won't do anything to anyone.
We've been sold out to the corporations. The corporations ARE the government. The players move freely between them. They're partners, friends, they're the same thing. Business uses government..."law"...to make money. Government is owned by business.
It's the way it is...the SCOTUS is owned by big business...that's why these draconian laws exist. There are many obscene laws. It's all fixed and you can't change it. It's a shame.
The government WILL get their way. Big operations will get shut down, but CA will turn a blind eye to the small guy. No changes from now. It will go to court like AZ with the border issues.
Maybe the govt will determine it's not worth the fight? But the drug war is such big business in itself. Look at the unemployed when 800,000 people are no longer being arrested. It's similar to the IRS and any tax overhaul...what are these millions of tax professionals supposed to do? Unemployment is already high... What are all these agents to do without Cannabis arrests?
I never understood the CA position...legalize for tax money? If everyone can...and most probably will, grow...how much did they plan on making? "Free", homegrown weed will be everywhere. Where is the money supposed to come from? Stores? Are they going to allow sale in stores?
The county sheriff should protect its residents from the feds. Growers in each county should get together and confront the sheriff about protecting them from the feds.
Sheriffs have the legal authority to arrest federal agents within their jurisdiction. The feds need the sheriffs consent to operate within their jurisdiction.
Tell your sheriffs to do their job and you shouldn't have to worry about the feds.
Who are you? Tell me why a sheriff can't arrest ANYONE in their jurisdiction? Who are you again?
I'm just surprised it has taken them this long to say anything.
Jed
They, being the state, isn't going to do SHIT. AS it is NOW CA produces better weed than MX and is already in the USA and DOES ship TONS of weed around the country.
CA will still be doing its thing with or without 19 and the PIGS will do what they do, but if TONS of this are smoked every month isn't it really like alcohol prohibition? Isn't the government more culpable than the grower, and won't the bowls continue to be filled despite or BECAUSE of the pigs?
I'm just surprised it has taken them this long to say anything.
Jed