Federal Reserve Audit Bill Overwhelmingly Passes The House

[bentom187]

^ indeed it,(the law)reads like, minimal contact with the feds is a priority,to prove you are not under federal jurisdiction and are not contracting with them,this includes using their money and even your address,its actually trade marked under the treasurey dept.wich is a private corparation. Ca vs california, one is a incorperated territorial jurisdiction the other is the state. in one you have rights the other you have debt.dont contract with the corperation,and when you use the treasurey notes you have become a federal treasurey agent,in wich they can then collect your income and property(yourself included since we are designated vessels and hence fall under maritime law),a audit, to make sure your holding up to your "contract" certificate of live birth&social security number (slave stuff),not your birth certificate. wich isnt a contract because all parties are not informed.

[YOUTUBEIF]I_jPBgj_oIk[/YOUTUBEIF]

remedies = rights with reguard to leagle terms.

the bottom docutments where actually taken from a freemason library from a guy on another site.who was talking about
" 'Cracking the Code' by Pete Hendrickson



Pete Hendrickson has literally 'cracked the Internal Revenue Code' by performing exhaustive searches to discover that Private Sector receipts are not subject to Federal Income taxes - this is huge! His information has helped readers to receive over $9 million in refunds from the IRS."

http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/f...the-code-by-pete-hendrickson?page=1&ref=title


knowlege is power,i addmit from the outside i know how rediculous this all sounds.

so if you guys want to research and vett these articles ,feel free to post what ya know,im sure you'll find jumping down the rabbit hole is better than tv,but it requires lots of reading.

disclaimerim not accusing anyone of anything simply persenting info)
we should try a 180* as fast as possible.


so you see how big of a leap just getting the FED into mainstream disscusion is.a audit would rock their world.

 

[bentom187]

......

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

it's free and you can't beat the price...

it's free and you can't beat the price...

The Authoritarians
Bob Altemeyer
Associate Professor
Department of Psychology
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Canada

Copyright ©, 2006 by Bob Altemeyer

Table of Contents

Introduction
http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/Introduction_links.pdf

Chapter 1 Who Are the Authoritarian Followers?
members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter1.pdf

Chapter 2 The Roots of Authoritarian Aggression, and
Authoritarian Itself
members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter2.pdf

Chapter 3 How Authoritarian Followers Think
members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter3.pdf

Chapter 4 Authoritarian Followers and Religious Fundamentalism
members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter4.pdf

Chapter 5 Authoritarian Leaders
members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter5.pdf

Chapter 6 Authoritarianism and Politics
members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter6%20.pdf

Chapter 7 What's To Be Done?
members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/chapter7.pdf

 

[bentom187]

we only offer a alternative views and can only pursuade people not force them to do what we want.
the guys argument or conclusion, only leaves anarchy and you have 0 rights with that.or you play the fence and nothing productive happens.
and since you think my phcycological state is that of authoritarian,why do i have a political philosophy of volenteerisim wich is synonomous with libertarianisim, anything else(not volentary) is authoritarian by default. further, protections under a volenteerist law(our republic) accounts for and protects against the problems the old or sick or weak may have from authoritarians.

heres food for thought.

Thomas Sowell Dismantles Egalitarianism (Frances Fox Piven Edition)
[YOUTUBEIF]26QxO49Ycx0[/YOUTUBEIF]



https://mises.org/daily/6027/The-Conspiracy-of-the-Equals
The Conspiracy of the Equals
Mises Daily: Thursday, August 02, 2012 by Murray N. Rothbard


America is NOT a Democracy!
[YOUTUBEIF]qiWt8cGP91o[/YOUTUBEIF]

Liberty, Social Order, and Neoliberalism" - Jörg Guido Hülsmann - Part 1
[YOUTUBEIF]-6u-CLnKwTs[/YOUTUBEIF]


A Critique of Anarcho-Communism and the Zeitgeist Movement | by Jörg Guido Hülsmann
[YOUTUBEIF]xgFWtmZ3nU0[/YOUTUBEIF]

Adam Kokesh explains the Non-Aggression Principle to Occupy DC attendee
[YOUTUBEIF]mM_WVUS6KAg[/YOUTUBEIF]

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

... and since you think my phcycological state is that of authoritarian,

It's not about me or you. The author expresses the data is more a measure of trends than individuals.

Among other things, the author relates why people read the same information and come away with different meanings.

Did you take the opportunity to score your RWA? You'd be at an advantage knowing the intent of the test before taking it. The test measures how predisposed we are to defending a side when we know little or nothing about and or are willing to act without considering the consequences.

How free is the high RWA when it's prone to dogmatic disposition?

 

[bentom187]

but i think , the deduction proccess sets out to label a group of people under a spectrum of one banner.authoritarian,only of right wing politics to boot,wich could mean anything throughout politics and time to different people.


how far in the future can we see, taking the universe, human emotion and action, and whatever else makes life worth living into account? the only solution i see is agreeing to disagree, and the people who cant agree to leave eachother alone will face a justice system of their peers and moral society, and if justice isnt there to save you immeadiatley you may posses a weapon or multiple weapons to protect yourself from unwanted force,because there are weaker people out there and you have a right to your life.
i think that is the best way to account for people in society.just addmiting we dont know whats best for everone. decentralization of power.

so we have to agree to rules,we are the experiment in being free, it can go either way(based on morals) otherwise its back to the other failed experiments wich constantly turn into revolution and overturned governments.so only in that sense is the future certain.

 

[monkey5]

bentom187, I will need to come back once I medicate .. before my head explodes! Law..first thing in the morning..not good for my brain! Lol..Lol..monkey5

 

[bentom187]

Fiat Money Explained in 4 minutes or less
[YOUTUBEIF]L_RU5wO8Fjw[/YOUTUBEIF]

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

4 minutes eh? Maybe that's why Ryan thinks a 4 year BA in economics makes him an economist.

 

[HUGE]

Fiat Money Explained in 4 minutes or less
[YOUTUBEIF]L_RU5wO8Fjw[/YOUTUBEIF]

It's good . I like it but he left a lot out. Like the whole bond markets and such.

 

[bentom187]

i have no idea what ryan's plan is,im guessing its more deficit spending.
theres a new documentary comming out from tom woods.bob murphy and jim grant are two very accomplished economist in the austrian school.theres more interviews at the website its called thebubble film.

bob murphy.
[YOUTUBEIF]dvWDnFZOYlk[/YOUTUBEIF]


jim grant
[YOUTUBEIF]VquBWxn0QLQ[/YOUTUBEIF]

 

[teemu shalanie]

question here from Canadian listener,..... what happens if they do audit the fed , and then everyone finds out the truth that paper $ is worthless, and doesnt represent an amount in gold or silver ,.....
TS

 

[bentom187]

the federal reserve is a "private group of bankers" lending to our government because we are broke(we have to audit our gold reserves aswell),we owe them whatever our national debt is now,we cant even manage to pay down the intrest,and the government isnt even allowed into the building.

Reality Check: Do We Really Need To Audit The Federal Reserve?
[YOUTUBEIF]mqmYRnBVmEo[/YOUTUBEIF]


this is a short film,its good to get a run down on what they do.
The American Dream By The Provocateur Network
[YOUTUBEIF]ZPWH5TlbloU[/YOUTUBEIF]

 

[dagnabit]

why is ryan even a topic in this thread?

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

why is ryan even a topic in this thread?

This guy might be yer vice-leader. Might not be a bad idea to get to know him.

Mini-Paul, Ryan Against Fed QE. For Fed Audit. Against Fed Full Employment Mandate

By Newswires August 13, 2012

Paul Ryan gives conservatives plenty of red meat in his criticism of the Fed. Paul Ryan is a mini-Paul. Paul Ryan<=Ron Paul. In fact, he’s really Ron Paul, repackaged for main stream consumption.

…Ryan has frequently verbally sparred with Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, especially over the Fed’s bond buying…

Ryan took Bernanke to task at a hearing in February 2011 over the Fed’s bond purchases, which the central bank used to pull down longer term interest rates.

“My concern is that the costs of the Fed’s current monetary policy — the money creation and massive balance sheet expansion — will come to outweigh the perceived short-term benefits,” Ryan said.

While one result of the Fed’s ultra-easy monetary policy has been a weaker dollar that has boosted U.S. exports, Ryan has said there is “nothing more insidious that a country can do to its citizens than debase its currency.”

Ryan has also supported moves to clip the Fed’s wings.

He has backed congressional oversight of the Fed’s monetary policy decision-making over Fed objections, and he supports eliminating the full employment part of the central bank’s dual mandate…
​

via UPDATE 1-Republican VP pick Ryan a critic of Fed policy | Reuters.

That’s it. Mini-Paul.

http://wallstreetexaminer.com/2012/...ed-audit-against-fed-full-employment-mandate/

 

[bentom187]

LewRockwell.com

Warning: Get Your Money Out: 'All Legal Bank Deposit Protections Are Now Officially Gone'


Former money manager Ann Barnhardt, who in November of 2011 made the decision to cease operations of her brokerage firm and return funds to her customers citing “systemic” problems within the entire financial industry, has issued a new warning about the stability of US banks and the safety of individual deposit accounts.

The warning, stemming from a recent federal appeals court ruling surrounding customer funds lost during the 2007 collapse of Chicago futures broker Sentinel, indicates that individuals who lose deposited funds because a financial institution improperly manages that money, even if those funds are supposed to be “segregated” from other operations of the firm, are essentially left with no recourse if the firm goes belly-up. According to the court, a misallocation of those customer funds, “is not, on its own, sufficient to rule as a matter of law that Sentinel acted ‘with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud’ its customers.”

The implications of the ruling, according to Barnhardt, will affect the monies of all private individuals who have seen their deposit accounts wiped out in the collapse of firms like John Corzine’s MF Global and put all deposit account holders in the country at risk should their bank be faced with a financial windstorm:


The NFA in collusion with the banksters, government and judiciary have achieved their goal. The entire concept of “customer segregated funds” is officially, completely, legally dead.

Guys, it is OVER. I know that many of you are still cowering in normalcy bias, unable to deal with reality, unable to face the world as it is, but you have GOT to snap out of it. The marketplace is DESTROYED. You CANNOT be in these markets. All legal protections are now officially gone.

…

The federal appeals court ruled yesterday that not only does BNYM stay at the front of the line, but that using customer segregated funds as collateral is NOT a crime, and that co-mingling customer segregated funds with proprietary funds is NOT fraud.

…

What this means is that even if Jon Corzine is somehow dragged into court by private citizens, because you know damn good and well that the Justice Department will never, ever touch him, Corzine now has a legal precedent, likely from a bribed or otherwise coerced Federal Appeals Court, explicitly stating that an FCM can use customer deposits to pay its debts, and that the customers themselves are subjugated and have basically no legal right to their own monies, no matter what the law says, or what legal assurances, claims or guarantees are made to that customer about their funds held with an FCM or any other brokerage or depository institution. The “secured” party at the front of the line will always be the mega-bank who made the fraudulent loan using the stolen customer funds as collateral.


In other words, all customer funds in the United States are now the legal property of JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, BNYM, or whichever megabank is the counterparty on the loans the FCM or depository institution takes out in order to fund its mega-levered proprietary in-house trading desks.

Source: Ann Barnhardt via Steve Quayle

The ruling is specifically designed to protect large financial institutions that have (purposefully) mismanaged customer funds and used the hard-earned life savings of Americans to gamble on equities, commodities and bond markets. If those firms happen to make the wrong bet, as MF Global, Sentinel and a handful of others have recently done, depositors who have placed funds with the banks under the belief that their bank account is securely protected from trading liabilities are now completely exposed and liable for the incompetence and negligence of those who engage in market trading.


This latest ruling combined with recent actions by the Federal Reserve and other government regulators suggests a massive fraud has taken place and the financial system itself is under extreme strain with the potential to make the financial collapse of 2007/2008 look like just a training exercise.

In recent days, for example, it’s come to light that the government has secretly called on the country’s five major banks to prepare themselves for collapse by creating stress recovery plans to be used in the event of worst case scenarios.


A few weeks ago, the Federal Reserve also implemented a new policy for money market funds held by financial institutions. Per the new policy, money market funds, which account for some $2.7 trillion in deposits across the United States, can be frozen in the event of an emergency or financial panic. This means that if and when the system does go into a tailspin, at exactly the time people will want to pull their money out of their bank account, they will be restricted from doing so.

These latest actions by government regulators, judges and financial institutions point to one thing: that we have an unprecedented financial collapse in the making. If such a financial crisis comes to pass it is clear that the policies and procedures now in place will transfer the legally owned deposits and money market savings of individual Americans into the hands of the banks at which those funds are kept.

Get Your Money Out.

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/sorry-your-money-is-now-frozen-bank-runs-have-become-illegal_072012

http://www.chicagotribune.com/busin...-preventing-collapse-20120810,0,2404399.story

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

That guy's nuts. The libertarian party ran him, Rothbard and Ron Paul out on a rail in 1988.

 

[dagnabit]

And still no one has offered a good reason why the fed should operate completely in the dark.
Lots of bullshit about Paul Ryan doing rails with Ron Paul or some other unrelated nonsense...

 

[bentom187]

romney and ryan ,they are just pandering to the crowds ,all their supporters require the ponzi scheme to continue,from the military industrial complex,to the corperate elite.they are not the freemarket economist they claim, very far from it.

Tom Woods - The Great Awakening - Ending The Federal Reserve

[YOUTUBEIF]6IhJxEHEqjg[/YOUTUBEIF]

 

[DiscoBiscuit]

Watch out, mentioning "end the fed" gets dag hopping angry. :