It was my understanding that the op only wanted to separate the lights from the air conditioning, not use the new wire to power the entire space Maybe I'm out of order here and drink too much
I would assume (and did) that if he was going to run 4k, he would drive his ballasts at 240v. This would result in a lighting load, aside from ballast losses, of just under 17 amps. If his a/c is on a separate circuit, he should be fine with the 5700+ watts that he would have available from an 80% loaded, 30a 240v circuit. The 80% limitation only refers to continuous loads - shorter duration loads can run up to the full rating of the breaker.
That said, if it was me, I wouldn't bother to run a sub-panel without carrying 60 amps to it.
Nice drawing! Note that the ground rod on the sub-panel is only required if the sub is in a different structure than the main.
It was my understanding that the op only wanted to separate the lights from the air conditioning, not use the new wire to power the entire space Maybe I'm out of order here and drink too much
Thanks, he never stated if he was gonna run at 240 or not to the ballast so i just went with the imprecision he would run then at 120 because hes gonna run an a/c and some blowers of 120. Either way 6/3 with 60amps to a panle should be the way to go. better safe then sorry. About the ground rod. i just put that in the pic to be safe, he didnt state if it was in same building or not. anyways good advise rives, sound like you know whats going on.