What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Dubphiend Dedication , Some Fluorescent Fun !

G

Guest

Hello,your interested in the use of fluorescent lighting for growing.

Good choice.

You are not scared away by the abundance of negitivity directed at fluorescents, are you brave, insane, feel a need to be diffrent? No.

There are plenty of ney sayers and myths out there about the inabliity to utilize fluorescent lighting as the primary source of light for growth. This is primarly due to 1. Hear say,"I herd there worthless once, so now i tell eveyone that" 2. Fluorescents are seen as beginer gear and not given seccond thought. 3. Lots of newbie growers use fluros due to there somewhat inexpensive cost, Newbie growers dont know how to grow and end up blaming their gear instead of their abilities. Futher adding to the bad rap of fluorescent lighting.

Fact is you'r probly at a point were your looking for lights to run through out your plants vegitative stage.Or mabie a low cost alertnitive to other grow lights.Looking for a cooler solution to HID lighting. No matter your problem fluorescent lighting can probly provide a solution.

Flowering with fluorescents is possible and can be done. The results are more often then not a lighter more airy less dence bud structure then can be had from HID lighting. This is almost always the case unless a skilled grower with the propper setup and knowledge is behind those fluorescents.
I personaly will never atempt to flower plants with fluros.

With that being said if fluros are your only means to run a grow then go for it with time and the information provided on this site, in time your efforts will be rewarded from the knowlegde gained during the growing experience.


So Now your all ready to go out and get some fluorescent lighting for your self.

Ok your back home now confused CFL, T-8, T-5, T-12, Ballast, Pulse start, Electronic start, Whatcham duhikkie, oooo my head hurts time to medicate.

Ballast: an electrical device used with fluorescent or HID (high intensity discharge) lamps to supply sufficient voltage to start and operate the lamp but then to limit the current during operation.


Color Rendering Index (CRI): a measure of a lamp’s ability to render colors accurately. The scale ranges from 1 (low pressure sodium) to 100 (the sun). A CRI of 85 is considered to be very good.

Color Temperature: a measure of the color appearance of a light source which helps describe the apparent "warmth" (reddish) or "coolness" (bluish) of that light source. Generally, light sources below 3200K are considered "warm;" while those above 4000K are considered "cool" light sources. The color temperature of a lamp has nothing to do with how hot the lamp will get or how much heat is given off by the lamp. The letter, K, stands for Kelvin.

Rapid Start: a fluorescent system that does not require starters and takes 1 to 2 seconds to emit light. The ballast preheats the electrodes within the fluorescent lamp and initiates the arc without a starter or the application of high voltage.

Wattage: the amount of electrical power consumed by a lamp or light fixture measured in “watts”. One watt is equal to the power dissipated by 1 ampere of electrical current flowing across a resistance of 1 ohm or the power produced by 1 ampere of electrical current under an electromotive force of 1 volt. One horsepower is equal to 746 watts.
Formulae: watts = volts x amps, P = V x I, electrical power = electromotive force x electric current.

Instant Start: refers to fluorescent lamps that start instantly without pre-heating the cathodes and without the need for starters.

Efficacy: a measure used to compare light output to energy consumption. Efficacy is measured in lumens per watt. A 100-watt light source producing 1750 lumens of light has an efficacy (efficiency) of 17.5 lumens per watt (L/W)

Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL): a generic name used for a whole family of small, single-ended fluorescent lamps with a folded, bridged, or spiral glass tube design and with high color rendering (CRI>80) and a long life (>8,000 hours). Cfl's have self contained ballasts.

FluoreX - Is a CFL Made by lights of america designed as a security flood light, can be used by growers for lighting. The bulb is 65w.I belive they only sell the white/blue spectrum bulb for their application.

Envirolights - Are are CFL's With Higher wattages specificly designed with the grower in mind, avalible in both blue and red spectrum

* I've Used both Enviorlights and FluoreX, I disagree with both.
I dont advise the use nor preach any benifits to CFL's
I feel they take up more wattage and give off more heat then a fluro should.

With a fluorescent light you have a faster rate of light intensity drop with in a smaller distance then other lights, as the light is less intence. With CFL lights getting as hot as they do it defeates a main benifit of growing with fluorescents wich is being able to place your plants .5 - 4.0In From the Bulbs, wich can not be done with CFL's as they get to hot and give off to much heat.

-------------------T- This T- That

T- stands for Tube

T12's - The standard shop lights hanging in our garage, that we thought would grow us a forest of pot when we first got the idea to grow. little did we know we were right. Now while thease are not the best there getting close they hold a decent watt/lumen ratio and stay cool enough to be able to counter their heat with a small fan. And most inportantly stay cool enough to get those lumnens there giving off practicly touching the plant with no harm.

T 8’s - Now You got it, This is is to me this is my holy grai for fluorescents.
A very good lumen to watt ratio. Smaller bulb then the t-12, stays significantly cooler then the smaller t'5s. 2850Lumes give or take for the average T8 bulb gives us an efficency of
87 lumens per watt. Pretty dam efficent for my money id have to say. 4ft 32watt T8 blubs on a homemade rack packed close, works great for growing.With a small breeze on the bulbs they can stay cool enough to not burn the plants if they happen to grow in to them. a small fan on the ballasts also helps keep things running cooler.

T5’s - If you wanna give thease a shot they have a greater intensity and more penitration power. i recomend thease to those who have their temperature under control or were a hotter light is not an issue. Thease lights are to hot to let the plants touch them. I would suggest useing thease in conjunction with t8’s.

T6’s - ive herd of this but have not looked much in to it.

I don’t want to touch to much on any other fluro’s becides the t8’s and t5’s as these fluros have more far more benifits then down falls in my opinion and i can not say the same for other types of fluros.


In the following i will describe the design insipred by Overgrows Dubphiend.

First This Persons avitar in dedication to the man with the plan the caused me and im sure many to give fluros a shot.




Seccond a Diagram With some instructions on buildding the lighting rack.




Wiring diagrams








And not the best view, but a shot of a completed light rack with moveable levels. You can also devide this to be droped and hightend with some sort of pully system if youd rather move the lights then the level of your plants.




And just some final notes, Plants can be grown under very low amounts of light, im not saying to do so or that theres any benifits, just that a plant is capable of growing under very under lits conditions. This is all from one observation- the following a male plant grown under 60 watts of fluros with little to no special attention payed to it.




Lastly heres a plants vegged under my t8's







Added slightly after submission - Dubphiend is around icmag, guess the last thing i did was check for that anyways take a look at his pix for some good pix of the lighting rack.

* The contents of this thread are a work in progress.
 
Last edited:
G

Guest

Hi MM,
I agree that fluros get a bad rap and that is unfortunate. They are truly a good alternaitive to those who have no way of running a "hot" light. I disagree that a plant cant be flowered without getting airy buds. Mine are rock hard.



Seed
PS-my next grow is going to be hps.
 

guineapig

Active member
Veteran
Have you seen the tt-105 bulb series (aka the "satellite" fixtures)? Now there's a
super-bright fluorescent bulb for ya....

Thanks for the thread MM.....If only HID technology would advance as rapidly as
fluorescent technology.....oh well....

:ying: yer pal gp :ying:
 
G

Guest

Hey Gp, thanks for stopin by! No i had not herd of those, but just took a look at a link with some info, and yes i guess ill have to investivage this new fluorescent technology.

Hopefully they give off a similar amout of heat as a t8, they look to be a decently large buld, wich would alow things to stay cooler, definatly got my attention!
 

guineapig

Active member
Veteran
ok so here's the 200w CFL option:

Primary Coverage Area
3 Feet by 3 Feet
Supplemental Coverage
6 Feet by 6 Feet

Approximate Cost
To Run Per Month
(16 hours per day, 6.0 cents per kilowatt hour):
$5.76

Usable Bulb Life: 1 Year

Hang between 1 and 2 feet above plant canopy.

(Total lumens is somewhere around 13,000- the 95 watter is 6,000 lumens so i just
multiplied by 2.....so i'm pretty sure its 13,000 lumens)

Ok now for the Satellite II fixture:

210 watts

21,000 lumens

$6.04 operating cost (based on a 16 hour light cycle)

Tubes can be either full spectrum or cooler white (for veg)....

THE WINNER: Satellite bulbs!!!

21,000 lumens compared to 13,000 lumens pretty much guarantees victory for the Satellite fixture.....

man these satellites are BRIGHT!!! when you look at them, i swear, they look more
like an HID than a fluorescent light.....kinda like a hybrid light!!!!

The Satellite bulbs are 4 feet long while the 200 W cfl bulb is scrunched up and
twisted and probably doesn't even measure more than 1 foot long. Personally, I like a
stretched-out bulb so that more plant leaves are actually in very close contact to the
bulb itself, because fluorescents can't quite penetrate the leaf canopy like HID lights
can....

Also i think its better to go with a mixed spectrum of one cool-white bulb and one
warm bulb rather than one full-spectrum bulb like the cfl....again, this is just personal
preference- it probably won't make a difference....

Finally, i have read a few on-line complaints about 200W cfl bulbs burning out or
malfunctioning......i haven't seen any complaints about the tt-105 bulbs, yet........

:ying: hooray for guineapigs!!!! :ying:
 

quantumfusion

New member
hmmm.... i guess i should do more research on the satellite II

4 feet is so long though... the 200w is only 14'' so its good, but is what youre saying about the light penetrate the canopy correct?
 

darrinjefferson

Active member
my first two grows i used cfls and i had excellent results.
i think cfls are awesome and the only reason i am makin a switch to hps is for more yield.







 

brooklyn

Member
some guidance please.....

some guidance please.....

i have a 95cm x 95 cm space that i want to do a floro grow from start to finish ala dubphiend, can anyone recommend the correct 4 bulb ballast, etc. for a 36in t8's, whats the highest lumens i can get for that size bulb?, i figure i can get 24 bulbs in there, which is about 6 ballast correct? what would the heat be like as well as the electrical draw? any help would be appreciated, also i would need international shipping...peace
 

mrwags

********* Female Seeds
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I Love Mine

I Love Mine

Well all I gotta say is I love new technology. The Satellite bulbs have been proven and have seen WITH MY OWN EYES what this new technology can do for your plants:








I got the 400 above if needed but trust me they will bush out before they stretch TECHNOLOGY IS SO COOL.



My 2 Cents

Mr.Wags
 
G

Guest

fluoros can easily provide dense bud

(I'm not sure where the rumour that they provide airy bud started)

the trick with flouros is to go with "mixed-spectrum" during flowering i.e. use additional blue bulbs, as well as the red ones

blue spectrum blubs are high UV - they will ensure dense THC rich buds

envirolite flouros are best hung vertically with an E40 fitting (reflectors are basically a waste of time, except perhaps during early veg)
this optimises useful output

vertically hung blubs minimise stretching

heat output is minimal, costs are extremely low

yield can be ensured by vegging longer than you might otherwise need to


go enviro!

lol

Namkha
 

Pure MoFo

Member
namkha said:
fluoros can easily provide dense bud

(I'm not sure where the rumour that they provide airy bud started)

the trick with flouros is to go with "mixed-spectrum" during flowering i.e. use additional blue bulbs, as well as the red ones

Namkha

I have to agree 100% with what Namkha says. Its all about providing the right mix.

-Pure
 

Storm Crow

Active member
Veteran
The "airy bud started with the fact that some strains do produce "airy" buds under flouros! Had a bag seed sativa that had nothing but fluff while a C-99 right next to her had rock hard buds. Some poor dude just had the wrong genetics along with his flouros. I'm in the 6th week of flowering and it looks OK (I had some mite problems, but neem is taking care of it). I like the GE Bath and Kitchen tubes for flowering- nice warm light.
 

mrwags

********* Female Seeds
ICMag Donor
Veteran
I recieved a request to share some more love involving imo the best veg floro strip of lights I have ever seen. Now before I start I gotta say it is amazing in this damn hobby how the really good kickass awesome shit is so damn expensive,case in point The Ez-Cloner 300.00 damn dollars for something you can make for around 30 bucks or so I thought. I went as far as to find the Ez-Cloner knock-off copied nozzles for my homemade cloner last year and thought I was in tall cotton, I was getting in the high 90% on my clones in less than 12 days BUT then I was allowed a wonderful opportunity to get the Rolls Rotce for 100.00 so here I am a year or so later singing the praises of this 300.00 piece of plastic letting anyone that will listen that IT'S WORTH EVERY FREAKIN PENNY. yes the rates are the same but the structure is ungodly the difference is night and day. So this brings me to the Satellite II by Sunleaves. Sunnyside has a complete run with one of these babys that does them justice:











The above pictures were taken on the 17th of this month.

Here are pictures from the 6th:





Now lets talk about structure:





Now with a massive root structure to start with and now thrown under this non heat love given gift of a floro I root during Flower (yes BOB is in the same room) and when I harvest I'm yank from BOB and away we go. Oh did I show ya what that structure gives ya in a bucket:









Now I am at fault for not doing a thread this run but I'm planning a little journey and have devoted EVERY last waking moment into ensuring the Journey is as good as I deserve. :pointlaug

Sorry to ramble guys but I just now got myself an iPod filled it up about 20 gigs of every kind of music you could possible think of and man what a difference a little music makes.

Oh and before any comments thats not a Trainwreck plant. i had burned a little (yeah right) ECSD and was not in my right mind when I edited. MY BAD



Have A Nice Day,
Mr.Wags
 
Last edited:

DOS

Member
Just wanted to bring this post back from the dead.

As I was inspired by dubphiend before the OG crash. I swore I would build one. I added some extras though. What you don't see in this pic is my new reptisun 8.0 UVB bulb. You can imagine it there though right now ;)

Grand total of 63,600 intitial lumens and some where arround 600+ watts.

19772done.jpg

Heres a close up of some dank I grew with it.

19772dankness.jpg


19772supermacro.jpg
 
Last edited:
G

Guest

Marijuanamessiah you need to change out your flo's bro's they be all dingy burnt out lookin around the ends lol
 
Top