Whats the Terps and effects like on this lady Brother? She looks chunky!
Whats the Terps and effects like on this lady Brother? She looks chunky!
The way I remember it, it was a perfect blend of the Albert walker and OG kush. The Chem D power is there in he effect. It's really a great cut.Whats the Terps and effects like on this lady Brother? She looks chunky!
You might have to remove the pods and manually pollinate as looks like its reverting back to Female.A few banana clusters have opened with pollen, but the big sacs still seem to be closed and growing.
View attachment 19049631 View attachment 19049632 View attachment 19049633 View attachment 19049634
Whats the Terps and effects like on this lady Brother? She looks chunky.
Thanks boss. I recieved that info last week on OG and i started pulling em. I do get some pollen from the clusters when I pull em at the right time but I haven't seen any pistils turn orange on any of the sites yet. Worried it's not viable pollen inside.You might have to remove the pods and manually pollinate as looks like its reverting back to Female.
Compared to your first Reversed pic looking near fully Reversed and now looking more 70/30 Reversed, I pick off any open flowers and either sprinkle over pistils as soon as picked off or save pods to dry and sieve clean.
Looking great either way
Takes longer than normal ( with Reversed pollen) for hairs to turn/show orange so just keep sprinkling the pods you pick off straight onto any white hairs , but after a few pods sprinkled over bud move on to other bud sites to pollinate.Thabks boss. I recieved that info last week on OG and i started pulling em. I do get some pollen from the clusters when I pull em at the right time but I haven't seen any pistils turn orange on any of the sites yet. Worried it's not viable pollen inside.
Told you bro, they slow to show Orange on making Feminized seeds , but already pollinated .Ah shit now. Starting to see orange pistils.
View attachment 19051594
If you are crossing to one of the original parents it's considered a step in the BX process.This has been nagging at me though. Isn't Dogwalker (Chem 4 x (Albert Walker x OG))?
So you're crossing to the albert walker, which is really nice, but that *might* actually not be a bx right? Cause one eye used OG?
I could be mistaken... I just know the OG is in there right?
Albert walker isn't an original parent though, Albert walker OG is. Re read the start of what I said.If you are crossing to one of the original parents it's considered a step in the BX process.
You are telling me Albert walker isn't a parent when it is? Got it.Albert walker isn't an original parent though, Albert walker OG is. Re read the start of what I said.
Not a p1 of dogwalker, no. Hoss is crossing dogwalker to Albert walker. Which is a grandparent but not the direct parent.You are telling me Albert walker isn't a parent when it is? Got it.
It's part of the original P1 pairing of AW x OG.
That's pure semantics.Not a p1 of dogwalker, no. Hoss is crossing dogwalker to Albert walker. Which is a grandparent but not the direct parent.
It's not semantics, it's just how backcrossing works. I apologize if what I said wasn't clear.That's pure semantics.
One could take any cutting in that lineage and use it to back cross. It all depends on your end goal.
We can agree to disagree on that.It's not semantics, it's just how backcrossing works. I apologize if what I said wasn't