When you defoliate a plant it sends signals through volatile molecules that will cause other plants nearby to react. When you put them in the same room the defoliated plant is taking all the stress and the non-defoliated plant is getting no stress with additional hormonal reactions due to the defoliated plant being nearby.
Not really because it can give you information that could be misleading or flat out wrong.Everything must start from somewhere, and this test will be better than no test, IMHO.
Plants absolutely DO communicate with each other and that is scientific fact. They can do so both through their roots and through the exchange of gaseous molecules.Sorry, but I think this is malarkey, brought to you by the same people who assert that plants respond to soothing music. Long-running myths with no scientific basis.
We don't know how and if cannabis reacts to defoliating. Many plants require a permanent low-level stress, like caterpillars or grasshoppers chewing on the leaves. There's no point in reacting against a cow which simply swallows the whole plant and that's it. You see my point?Man I've been waiting for someone to do this. Unfortunately this experiment is useless. When you defoliate a plant it sends signals through volatile molecules that will cause other plants nearby to react. When you put them in the same room the defoliated plant is taking all the stress and the non-defoliated plant is getting no stress with additional hormonal reactions due to the defoliated plant being nearby. Your control here in this experiment is flawed, and you will get useless data because of it. Nevertheless this type of experiment is interesting and I commend your efforts up to this point.
I fell like you're rationalizing this from a plants perspective, but I understand your point. I disagree because cannabis naturally grows in stands, so if a cow eats one plant then the whole stand becomes more defensive and has a much better chance of survival.There's no point in reacting against a cow which simply swallows the whole plant and that's it. You see my point?
This experiment is completely qualitative which is bad enough, but any observations that you could make aren't even reliable. The basis of the experiment is that OP assumes he can visibly tell the difference between his control and the defoliated plant. So if the control is not really a control then what is the point of the experiment? You have to throw out the baby with the bath water on this one.Sure, the experiment from a scientific point of view is flawed but that doesn't mean the result will be trash.
Man I've been waiting for someone to do this. Unfortunately this experiment is useless. When you defoliate a plant it sends signals through volatile molecules that will cause other plants nearby to react. When you put them in the same room the defoliated plant is taking all the stress and the non-defoliated plant is getting no stress with additional hormonal reactions due to the defoliated plant being nearby. Your control here in this experiment is flawed, and you will get useless data because of it. Nevertheless this type of experiment is interesting and I commend your efforts up to this point.