What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Deep State: Exposed

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/2016-certificates/pdfs/vote-california.pdf

Ed Buck was a California electoral college voter. Which if not mistaken are hand picked. Probably not something many want to bring much attention to. Unfortunately for Mr. Buck, when going for high score and a victim lives, that often cannot be overlooked.
Those Hollywood hills, and the history they do know.
Always sort of thought of Hollywood as a West coast division of Madison Ave.
 
M

Mr D

Weinstein, Epstein and now Buck. The democrats are going to run out of money if this keeps up.
 

Badfishy1

Active member
Weinstein, Epstein and now Buck. The democrats are going to run out of money if this keeps up.

Unfortunately not really a left/ right issue. Sure he is a democratic donor and electoral voter. However the dems will distance themselves from it and no repercussions. Same way republicans distanced themselves from Ol’ Denny Hastert

And until the public actually gives a fuck collectively and demands justice instead of posting fake outrage for likes and upvotes, nothing happens. Power continues corrupting the already corrupt
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
indeed it's not a left right issue. its a right right issue since both parties are right wing lol
 

Thcvhunter

Well-known member
Veteran
True but most likely autistic by age 2 according to his Mother, he was a normal, outgoing baby who went into the hospital with Strep throat and returned home very withdrawn.

The government uses people who are odd/different or "retarded"

That way if they were to tell someone that the government taught them how to shoot people will just dismiss him by saying he is mentally handicapped.

Ive noticed this happen with aspergers.
People with Aspergers are exceptionally bright and atypically highly sensitive/empathic.
But then govt-controlled media spins that into getting people to believe that people on the spectrum are bad or dangerous. No, they are harmless, its the training and drugs the government gives them that makes those assets dangerous.

The military and Sepec/Black-Ops are full of people who were harmless then trained(brainwashed) into becoming killers.
In fact, its difficult.to train a person to kill.
In WWII, 80% of shots fired were fired above the head of the enemy because soldiers didnt want to kill. So DoD and DoS created programs to brainwash soldiers into wanting to, or at least be able to, kill people.
So, we see the progression from round targets to hunan silhouettes, to make it an easy transition from trainjng to shoot paper to actually shooting a human. There are other methods that are not yet unclassified.

I myself, when trained, was expressly told, "everything Im about to teach you is brainwashing"
And well, it worked. I can hit the mouth of a beer can with iron sights on an AK47/AKM at 50 meters freehanded/standing unsupported. Yet, I have no desire to ever shoot anyone. Must be my high sensitivity/empathy.

Again, I highly recommend reading, not watching, Men Who Stare At Goats.
 

Brother Nature

Well-known member
The government uses people who are odd/different or "retarded"

That way if they were to tell someone that the government taught them how to shoot people will just dismiss him by saying he is mentally handicapped.

Ive noticed this happen with aspergers.
People with Aspergers are exceptionally bright and atypically highly sensitive/empathic.
But then govt-controlled media spins that into getting people to believe that people on the spectrum are bad or dangerous. No, they are harmless, its the training and drugs the government gives them that makes those assets dangerous.


The military and Sepec/Black-Ops are full of people who were harmless then trained(brainwashed) into becoming killers.
In fact, its difficult.to train a person to kill.
In WWII, 80% of shots fired were fired above the head of the enemy because soldiers didnt want to kill. So DoD and DoS created programs to brainwash soldiers into wanting to, or at least be able to, kill people.
So, we see the progression from round targets to hunan silhouettes, to make it an easy transition from trainjng to shoot paper to actually shooting a human. There are other methods that are not yet unclassified.

I myself, when trained, was expressly told, "everything Im about to teach you is brainwashing"
And well, it worked. I can hit the mouth of a beer can with iron sights on an AK47/AKM at 50 meters freehanded/standing unsupported. Yet, I have no desire to ever shoot anyone. Must be my high sensitivity/empathy.

Again, I highly recommend reading, not watching, Men Who Stare At Goats.


One of the best illustrations of point of this would be Theodore J. Kaczynski.



Men who Stare at Goats is a great film too!
 
M

Mr D

Unfortunately not really a left/ right issue. Sure he is a democratic donor and electoral voter. However the dems will distance themselves from it and no repercussions. Same way republicans distanced themselves from Ol’ Denny Hastert

And until the public actually gives a fuck collectively and demands justice instead of posting fake outrage for likes and upvotes, nothing happens. Power continues corrupting the already corrupt

It's called sarcasm, nothing will change in your lifetime.
 

Thcvhunter

Well-known member
Veteran
When Young George Washington Started a War

A just-discovered eyewitness account provides startling new evidence about who fired the shot that sparked the French and Indian War

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/hist...arted-war-180973076/?utm_source=pocket-newtab


Washington knew what the French were about.
They had already teame up with the Indians against the Brits.

The French were very much about The Gentleman's War. And they communicated their intentions before ever engaging in war.

The French reach out to the Brits and the Colonists for a sit-down.

GW takes the lead on this. He agrees and takes a small team of men, equipped light.
They wait for the French to enter the building and sit down for peaceful talks.
Then they storm in there with knives, hatchets, and pistols and slaughter everybody in moments.

George Washington was America's first action hero /operator
 

minds_I

Active member
Veteran
Hello all,

yup, any day now...a boomeranging avalanche is going to come crashing down.yup, any day now.
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
picture.php
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Personally I'm suspect, I feel like Hannity is feeding the base and possibly pushing conspiracy theories just like Rachel Maddow does. In the end I doubt anyone will be held accountable.
 

Gry

Well-known member
Veteran
Personally I'm suspect, I feel like Hannity is feeding the base and possibly pushing conspiracy theories just like Rachel Maddow does. In the end I doubt anyone will be held accountable.
They are paid well to blame the victim.
 

White Beard

Active member
Personally I'm suspect, I feel like Hannity is feeding the base and possibly pushing conspiracy theories just like Rachel Maddow does. In the end I doubt anyone will be held accountable.

Interesting...so a professional “conservative” agenda-pusher *might* be pushing the agenda he pushes every day on the radio and every night on the television?

“...just like Rachel Maddow does”

Really? I grew up having agendas pushed on me, I got good at spotting them, good at spotting those who use them.

Maddow has her personal point of view? Duh, and so do you. The difference between her and Hannity is much like the difference between her and you: she sorts through events, reports, court filings, hearings, etc...and does a damned good job making sense out of it, IMO; Hannity stays on message, like he’s paid to do.

You just stay on Hannity’s message.
Time to get good at noticing the people around you more closely...
 

'Boogieman'

Well-known member
Interesting...so a professional “conservative” agenda-pusher *might* be pushing the agenda he pushes every day on the radio and every night on the television?

“...just like Rachel Maddow does”

Really? I grew up having agendas pushed on me, I got good at spotting them, good at spotting those who use them.

Maddow has her personal point of view? Duh, and so do you. The difference between her and Hannity is much like the difference between her and you: she sorts through events, reports, court filings, hearings, etc...and does a damned good job making sense out of it, IMO; Hannity stays on message, like he’s paid to do.

You just stay on Hannity’s message.
Time to get good at noticing the people around you more closely...

You are biased, that's all I have to say.
 

Cannavore

Well-known member
Veteran
no ones put on the TV media circuit without them expressly being corporate fashie shills. independent thought and voices are quickly stamped out.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top