Misled. So he’s just stupid? I’ll accept that.
-
As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.
Deep State: Exposed
- Thread starter med4u
- Start date
Misled. So he’s just stupid? I’ll accept that.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Tucker has told people that most likely there was voter fraud but not on a level that could overturn the election which is probably a true statement. I watch Tucker and have no expectations that somehow Trump will win in court. Hannity is the one pushing voter fraud heavily.
Absolem
Active member
Tucker Carlson's main writer was let go a few months ago for his racist and sexist secret online accounts.
Scum pools together. These are the people you get your "news" from.
https://apnews.com/article/acdc9fa8f5cf7010d5f70d8958d47c50
Tucker Carlson’s top writer has resigned from Fox News after secretly posting racist and sexist remarks online.
CNN reported Friday that writer Blake Neff used a pseudonym to write bigoted comments about Black and Asian people, as well as women, on the online forum AutoAdmit.
Neff began working on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” in 2016 and was known as Carlson’s top writer. Neff previously worked as a reporter for the right-wing news outlet The Daily Caller, which Carlson co-founded.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
So Tucker fired someone who was a racist, this does not prove anything. You are grasping at straws as usual. It's apparent that none of you can back your claims with anything relevant.
Absolem
Active member
Proves he hangs with scum and hires scum. Just like your boy tRump.
Tucker hires a racist as his main writer. Yet you say we can't prove nothing. lmao
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/9177...s-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye
Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way.
The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
^^^Same exact shit Alex Jones's lawyers argued in court. That you can't actually believe or take what he says truthfully or seriously.
Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way.
The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive
^^^Same exact shit Alex Jones's lawyers argued in court. That you can't actually believe or take what he says truthfully or seriously.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
So basically you have no real examples that Tucker pushes far right propaganda. In fact your one example is that he fired somebody for it. Thank you for proving my point.
Absolem
Active member
Read Cannavore's post above yours.. Tucker pushes right wing propaganda daily. If you can't see it open up your brain.
Go send Tucker a love letter telling him how bad you feel his pain. Derp.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Lawyers are liars who will say anything to win a case, are you really trying to change my mind based on what some shabby lawyer said? This doesn't prove that Tucker pushes far right propaganda either, perhaps not everything he says is true but that's the case for everyone in the news business today.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Cannavior is a sucker for extreamist propaganda no matter what side he is on and that is an absolute fact. He has yet to prove that Tucker pushes far right propaganda. If he had a real example he would just post a clip of Tucker talking but we all know he has nothing.
Absolem
Active member
The article states Tucker's not a "news" person and Fox says he's not too. And here you are claiming he's a "news" person.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
The article is based on the opinion of a Lawyer who is busy trying to win a lawsuit.
Absolem
Active member
The article is based on a court case. Try and keep up denier.
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Are you saying lawyers don't lie in court? Keep grasping at straws bro.
Lol. So righteous. Some ego's around these parts are flipping outrageously confident in their error.
Absolem
Active member
I'm saying you are the biggest denier of anything that's negative related to Trump and Tucker. You are so tied to these two you go out of your way to defend them on everything.
So lawyers lie but Tucker doesn't. Got it.
Tuckers a piece of shit and you look up to him.
Next your going to tell us Hannity isn't right wing propaganda either.
"This “general tenor” of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not “stating actual facts” about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in Case 1:19-cv-11161-MKV Document 39 Filed 09/24/20 Page 11 of 1912 “exaggeration” and “non-literal commentary.” Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 20-21; Levinsky’s, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 127 F.3d 122, 128 (1st Cir. 1997)). Fox persuasively argues, see Def Br. at 13-15, that given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer “arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism” about the statements he makes. 600 W. 115th Corp. v. Von Gutfeld, 80 N.Y.2d 130, 141, 603 N.E.2d 930, 936 (1992). Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson’s statements as “exaggeration,” “non-literal commentary,” or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same—the statements are not actionable"
they basically admit this in court to prove his statements in a specific court case that what tucker says is opinion and not factual implying he cannot face scrutiny for wrongdoing.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv11161/527808/39/
they basically admit this in court to prove his statements in a specific court case that what tucker says is opinion and not factual implying he cannot face scrutiny for wrongdoing.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv11161/527808/39/
'Boogieman'
Well-known member
Now you are moving the goal posts, every news anchor gets something wrong every once in a while. I asked for examples of Tucker pushing far right propaganda and you guys are yet to post any real examples.
