I don't know about males but landrace african sativa females that haven't been away from their region of origin for too long can be insanely dominant also. I've read that wild traits in most plant species tend to be dominant. The malawi and ghanaian sativas I've bred in a cross with the parvati c99 and g13bx males are still dificult to grow indoors (get very tall) taste identical to the african parent. While they are about 4-5 weeks faster and they dont require the sun to produce a fully formed bud, the structure indoors of the f1 is the largely same as the pure sativa when grown outside. It could be that those three indicas aren't very dominant as males but I'm thinking the equatorial africans are just very dominant because of less intensive selective breeding techniques and the faster a plant is changed through selective inbreeding the less dominant that strain is in a cross. So when a line is very slowly changed over centuries like the equatorial africans than it does if it changes very quickly through inbreeding like flodica. If this is true the deep chunk's dominance shows how well the line was maintained and true it is to it's original form. I don't know if there's any scientific foundation to this but anecdotally it seems to be the case.
Last edited: