Three Berries
Active member
still more credible than anything on bitchute or beltway pundit
But muh Russian Hoax!
still more credible than anything on bitchute or beltway pundit
GOT_BUD? Even if she is right said:when someone is right, they are right. excellent credibility. not believing someone (or not wanting to) does not strip them of credibility. 2+2=4, regardless of who says it...
Just because Rachel reported it doesn't make it false. I can't say the same for anyone on Fox. They lie or distort the truth every day.
She reports the FACTUAL news but adds her take on it. This is what her show is about. The same people on Fox don't do that. They report their distorted news which is rarely the truth..Watching the same story coming for both is drastically different.. Fox makes everything benefit Right rep/gop politics unless they deem you a rhino. If your a rhino your looked at as a lib lol.
All the good reports on Fox quit.. Because of Tucker..
You don't watch Fox do you?
LOL, We all have to choose what we see on MSM as truth or BS. I posted what I see.
2 Fox News commentators resign over Tucker Carlson series on the Jan. 6 siege
https://www.npr.org/2021/11/21/1052837157/fox-resignations-tucker-carlson-patriot-purge-documentary
I've never watched much MSM.. Lately, I've ve been interested to see how ea reports the same news.
After the good reporters on FOX quit I don't even attempt it... It's nothing but a political tool for Trumplicans. It's the shittest of the news org there is.. Chris Wallace quit after Tucker's show with all lies ..
Chris Wallace is now at CNN LMAO
Same shit different "side"
A Court Ruled Rachel Maddow's Viewers Know She Offers Exaggeration and Opinion, Not Facts
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers
"On one hand, a viewer who watches news channels tunes in for facts and the goings-on of the world. MSNBC indeed produces news, but this point must be juxtaposed with the fact that Maddow made the allegedly defamatory statement on her own talk show news segment where she is invited and encouraged to share her opinions with her viewers. Maddow does not keep her political views a secret, and therefore, audiences could expect her to use subjective language that comports with her political opinions.Tucker Carlson Successfully Argues Nobody Really Believes Tucker Carlson Is Reporting Facts
Thus, Maddow’s show is different than a typical news segment where anchors inform viewers about the daily news. The point of Maddow’s show is for her to provide the news but also to offer her opinions as to that news. Therefore, the Court finds that the medium of the alleged defamatory statement makes it more likely that a reasonable viewer would not conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact."
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/...y-believes-tucker-carlson-is-reporting-facts/
"According to Judge Vyskocil, “Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes." She doesn't stop there, writing that “[w]hether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as exaggeration, non-literal commentary, or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same—the statements are not actionable."
Judge Vyskocil also pointed out that Carlson said “sounds like" prior to saying the word extortion, which “would put any reasonable viewer on notice that Carlson himself doubts the veracity of the source of these statements and that the listener should as well." President Trump appointed Judge Vyskocil to the bench in 2019."
Ah yes, virtue signaling at it's finest.
(The 2 jackasses who quit in "protest".)
Many experiencing the “ great awakening” are still half asleep thinking they’re wide awake. That’s entertainment.