What's new
  • As of today ICMag has his own Discord server. In this Discord server you can chat, talk with eachother, listen to music, share stories and pictures...and much more. Join now and let's grow together! Join ICMag Discord here! More details in this thread here: here.

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

  • yes, gimme

    Votes: 29 31.9%
  • not yet

    Votes: 15 16.5%
  • no way

    Votes: 47 51.6%

  • Total voters
    91
  • Poll closed .

Volcanna

Active member
Veteran
i must have missed it. exactly where did DeSantis (or Politifact) say natural immunity was stronger or longer lasting than an immunization? "mostly true" means "partly bullshit". no comparisons were made RE immunizations vs natural immunity in there. and no weight given the fact that you still have to get the disease in order to get that level of immunity.

I like to imagine how painful it was for them to write mostly true. Lol at calling it an immunization. Those provide immunity. Here’s the link. https://www.statesman.com/story/new...ity-covid-provide-best-protection/8363588002/
 

Volcanna

Active member
Veteran
immunizations have never given complete immunity. probably never will. keep beating that dead horse...

immunizations have never given complete immunity. probably never will. keep beating that dead horse...

immunizations have never given complete immunity. probably never will. keep beating that dead horse...

immunizations have never given complete immunity. probably never will. keep beating that dead horse...

Polio vax is.
210E43E2-30C6-4C45-B8A1-E10A690472F4.jpeg
210E43E2-30C6-4C45-B8A1-E10A690472F4.jpeg
210E43E2-30C6-4C45-B8A1-E10A690472F4.jpeg
210E43E2-30C6-4C45-B8A1-E10A690472F4.jpeg
​​​​​​
 
Natural immunity is superior.

Sources of data used in this video are :
CDC
reuters,
science.org,
medrix
and medscape.

Links to all data sources are in the video description. If you dispute the data you are disputing the above sources, not the person presenting it to you.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
do you think that re-posting the same thing about an outlier in vaccinations makes your bullshit more credible? quit wasting space, it is no more correct after 4 times than it was the first. "three doses 99 to 100%" so, obviously, some folks are NOT 100% safe, like i was saying. your horse is STILL dead, but you keep right on beating it. maybe it will come back to life if you flog it long enough, lol!😄
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
Natural immunity is superior.

Sources of data used in this video are :
CDC
reuters,
science.org,
medrix
and medscape.

Links to all data sources are in the video description. If you dispute the data you are disputing the above sources, not the person presenting it to you.

most studies i have read state that prior exposure AND vaccination give the best protection, not "natural immunity" alone. but that STILL ignores the unfortunate fact that you have to get the disease & risk death and/or long-term covid & its damage to benefit from that mixed bag of protection. MOST intelligent people would rather not get the virus. those that want it are welcome to it. maybe we should set up "drive through clinics" where folks that think like you can go & get shots guaranteed to GIVE you the virus. pretty sure the Hippocratc Oath prevents medical personnel from doing that though... "first, do no harm..." youtube videos, lol... cherry picked & mis-represented bullshit 90% of the time. except for funny cat clips.
 
most studies i have read state that prior exposure AND vaccination give the best protection, not "natural immunity" alone. but that STILL ignores the unfortunate fact that you have to get the disease & risk death and/or long-term covid & its damage to benefit from that mixed bag of protection. MOST intelligent people would rather not get the virus. those that want it are welcome to it. maybe we should set up "drive through clinics" where folks that think like you can go & get shots guaranteed to GIVE you the virus. pretty sure the Hippocratc Oath prevents medical personnel from doing that though... "first, do no harm..." youtube videos, lol... cherry picked & mis-represented bullshit 90% of the time. except for funny cat clips.

"MoSt StUdIes I hAvE rEaD.." lmao.. Yet you ignore a video breakdown of those studies given by an experienced, medically trained doctor... Just because its on youtube...
Yeah, I think I'll go with Dr. Johns analysis over yours, and also over my own, seeing as he's an expert with 40 years experience, and I'm not and neither are you. I doubt you actually read any studies tbh, I dont believe you'd understand or recognise all the words and medical terms. I'll stick with the Doctors. You enjoy your cat vids.
And dont forget to get your next booster.
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
"MoSt StUdIes I hAvE rEaD.." lmao.. Yet you ignore a video breakdown of those studies given by an experienced, medically trained doctor... Just because its on youtube...
Yeah, I think I'll go with Dr. Johns analysis over yours, and also over my own, seeing as he's an expert with 40 years experience, and I'm not and neither are you. I doubt you actually read any studies tbh, I dont believe you'd understand or recognise all the words and medical terms. I'll stick with the Doctors. You enjoy your cat vids.
And dont forget to get your next booster.

You don’t mean “doctors”, you mean “doctor”. The one you chose that agreed with your nonsense. I don’t need a video breakdown by a quack. I remember in school, we used books. That we’re studied . Broken down into sections and all. YouTube is for those who need to be told. Spoken to like a child. The tv generation. Most presentations done in that manner are illusions and mostly bullshit., though there are some decent DIY ones.
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
Natural immunity is superior.

Sources of data used in this video are :
CDC
reuters,
science.org,
medrix
and medscape.

Links to all data sources are in the video description. If you dispute the data you are disputing the above sources, not the person presenting it to you.

Not at all. It’s a video distortion. You’re being told what to think. Maybe you need that?
 
We Can Easily Settle This.

Put your hands up if you're planning to get a jab or booster, from now. Show of hands please.


(If you're not getting anymore shots it can only be because you accept they're not necessary, which is everything they were predicated on, to the point of mandate).

Show of hands please. Who's still getting a shot?
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
We Can Easily Settle This.

Put your hands up if you're planning to get a jab or booster, from now. Show of hands please.


(If you're not getting anymore shots it can only be because you accept they're not necessary, which is everything they were predicated on, to the point of mandate).

Show of hands please. Who's still getting a shot?


Whatever. Screw science. Getting desperate?
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Pathology of vaccine deaths and vaccine damage:
post-evidence first evidence


Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, March 11, 2022
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
Another “expert”. If you’re not killing them in Ukraine, you’re killing them in their beds.
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
And dont forget to get your next booster.

i won't, don't worry. and thanks for caring when you so obviously don't care about anyone else...no, i don't put much stock in someone building a house out of cherry-picked cards & putting it on youtube. if you root through enough information, it is easy to make a case for anything you like if you are willing to misrepresent what they were talking about & jump to incorrect conclusions. "a bit of truth at the core of every lie" carry on...
 

armedoldhippy

Well-known member
Veteran
We Can Easily Settle This.

Put your hands up if you're planning to get a jab or booster, from now. Show of hands please.


(If you're not getting anymore shots it can only be because you accept they're not necessary, which is everything they were predicated on, to the point of mandate).

Show of hands please. Who's still getting a shot?

i hate to be the one to break this to you, but reality is not decided by voting. when the CDC says that those folks that got the Moderna vaccine should get another shot, i'll go get it. and yes, i read this morning that the makers of Moderna have asked for authorization for another booster. just wanted to keep your head from exploding over an anticipated false "gotcha" moment. another mutation has been detected, China being hammered again, etc.
 

Volcanna

Active member
Veteran
most studies i have read state that prior exposure AND vaccination give the best protection, not "natural immunity" alone. but that STILL ignores the unfortunate fact that you have to get the disease & risk death and/or long-term covid & its damage to benefit from that mixed bag of protection. MOST intelligent people would rather not get the virus. those that want it are welcome to it. maybe we should set up "drive through clinics" where folks that think like you can go & get shots guaranteed to GIVE you the virus. pretty sure the Hippocratc Oath prevents medical personnel from doing that though... "first, do no harm..." youtube videos, lol... cherry picked & mis-represented bullshit 90% of the time. except for funny cat clips.
Most studies you read also said natural immunity much stronger than the jab alone. But but but what if you get a virus with a 99% survival rate and a 5% hospitalization rate. You are still getting the virus if you are exposed that’s the funny part.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top