I say give a pass, with some climates and varieties tomatoes just water stress.Please figure out how to grow tomatoes. We get huge delicious tomatoes in marietta Ohio without them cracking.
Some tasty looking vegetables there IMHO.
I say give a pass, with some climates and varieties tomatoes just water stress.Please figure out how to grow tomatoes. We get huge delicious tomatoes in marietta Ohio without them cracking.
Here I'll help you out......Please figure out how to grow tomatoes. We get huge delicious tomatoes in marietta Ohio without them cracking.
any tomato will crack, especially big heirlooms will when sitting on the vines too long, in the sun when it's weeks on end 90's + and dry, always..... Give a pass, lol....TY I guessI say give a pass, with some climates and varieties tomatoes just water stress.
Some tasty looking vegetables there IMHO.
I’m just jabbing, 99% of everything looked delicious.Here I'll help you out......
"Hey Ledo, how come a small % of your tomatoes have cracks on tops"
"Cuz I'm a one man show & Gentleman farmer (look up definition please) and they sit on the vine way past they should & often"
I walk outside, see what needs harvesting and harvest, this happens all the time, those are just a few days of many each year pictured, rinse repeat... and this is not my career friend, not by a long shot..... Just a dudes backyard, exactly as I said in a large neighborhood surrounded by others grass.....
Can we see what the queens of Marietta Grow please. all your stuff, cannabis too - thank you...?
any tomato will crack, especially big heirlooms will when sitting on the vines too long, in the sun when it's weeks on end 90's + and dry, always..... Give a pass, lol....TY I guess
Gentleman Farmer " a man who farms mainly for pleasure rather than for profit."
and trust me, we have so much abundance I can't even give enough away, my compost pit gets fed very well... Next year though my kids will be old enough I've built them a stand to sell to our neighbors so they can learn a bit of business on the fly...
Man are folk wound up tight in Marietta Ohio...
You are wrong. Everybody here judges most aspects of crop success without a lab report.
You are wrong. I have (on occasion) lab analysis done every week, with that moving to every 3 days through transition. I will show you mine, when you show me yours. However it's only anecdotal still, and you don't think for yourself. Or you missed a word, in that story of me making a mess with words. I don't really care which. I think you finish with trying to read the future though. Which demonstrates your ability to look at the evidence and make a decision.
I realise you are blinkered, but I hope other people can see there is actually a topic known as crop steering. It puts an umbrella over all the things that we do to influence a crop. I don't mean support it while it does what it wants to. I mean the things we do to change it's course. It's a virgin topic, and as such nobody is quite sure what fits into the category. Many hope to find nutritionally focused research under this heading. Such as the very late high K boost some hemp feeds have, or the loading of Ca and P in later veg. Many things we do are passed over from other crops, and while we can see they work, are often for reasons we don't understand. It's not long ago we knew when cannabis would flower, but didn't know if it was the day length or night length that did it. Today, our demands for knowledge are much more in depth. However cannabis research has a spotty history. Only now are we seeing papers piling up on the topics we want to see. However, we are still at NPK on the whole. Other elements have toxicology studies, and deficiency studies done in isolation. However, we don't have the Ca studies we really want yet.
I get that we need this. Other people on the thread get it, and have offered links. The people in this study also give a nod to the fact. Even then though, it will be a study of levels at first. With timing coming in the future. Though we have analysis showing when it's taken, and interestingly, when it's not. Which is later in flower, when issues may develop. However.. you missed the window. You have to load up when you can. These are things that are only proven circumstantially, and even when it does become science fact, facts can be changed as we learn more. It's actually anecdotal evidence that enables us to grow. Which most of us were doing before ever seeing a lab report. Thus, if you think you need a lab report to accept something, you are without reason. And we have seen your reasoning.
I'm not actually sure why you are on this thread. You can't spin a discussion off that study. You can't even recognise one. The chances of you joining the dots to other studies are immeasurable. It's as useless to you, as you are being here. By my reasoning, based on this and other encounters with you, you're just trolling.oops
Wowza that’s a healthy looking harvest for sure! Beautiful work!
When I looked at different studies from different labs, I realized that they never publish all the data. And sometimes the article does not describe important nuances and it is not possible to get the desired result. This reminds me of how I was looking for information for my essays on global warming to be published at https://edubirdie.com/examples/global-warming/ and also faced an acute lack of information. It seems to be a popular topic, there are many scientific articles. But there is almost no actual data from scientific research in the public domain. I think this is normal, because if someone pays for research, then he wants to keep some secrets. But understanding the information can be very difficult.In trying to work with this study, I have realised some crucial info is missing. There is nothing related to water or feed uptake. No idea of top up volume, or changing nutrient concentration. In the feed or tissue. I can't estimate based on temperature or RH as both are also missing. Perhaps a put to much faith in such data, but with K being thought of as a major factor in water movement, and water movement being how some things make it from tank to plant, I see water uptake as important. Many a grower lowers EC when it's hot, so they don't eat too much, then raises EC when it's cool, and water transport is lower.
I feel, to really understand their grow, I need that bit more info about water usage. General environment. Things that a commercial study should be looking at.
Frontiers | Optimisation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium for Soilless Production of Cannabis sativa in the Flowering Stage Using Response Surface Analysis
Following legalisation, cannabis has quickly become an important horticultural crop in Canada and increasingly so in other parts of the world. However, due t...www.frontiersin.org
I don't know what to think about it. Lots of info, and some of it is exactly opposite of what I thought was fact. In particular the amount of N they ran during flowering. I always heard you'd grow nothing but fluff garbage bud with that much nitrogen.
Any chance you can break that down a bit for simpletons like myself? I understand PPM of liquid feed. I don't know lbs per acre and all that.6 weeks later... I found it
That's a bigger outdoor study with the same findings. Higher N than typical, and K has little relevancy
It looks like deficient soil was helped the most by application of nitrogen.Any chance you can break that down a bit for simpletons like myself? I understand PPM of liquid feed. I don't know lbs per acre and all that.
What did they ultimately conclude?
Well they only looked at N and K. Nowhere responded to different K rates. One site didn't respond to N either. They seem to of made no other comment on that site. They did about 6 sites, and the report concentrates on 3 of them.Any chance you can break that down a bit for simpletons like myself? I understand PPM of liquid feed. I don't know lbs per acre and all that.
What did they ultimately conclude?
The soil had to be deficient. How would you test at 25ppm, if the soil already had 50ppm. It's like hydro guys using RO to take out everything, to decide what goes in. Plus how many fields are not deficient for growing such plants, year after year.It looks like deficient soil was helped the most by application of nitrogen.
I noticed:
Zero tissue samples for nitrogen.
Zero cannabinoid results.
Zero stem/leaf/flower ratio info.
Another incomplete and mostly useless study. *sigh*
So you did tissue sample analysis every 3 days but you cannot show some pics of your plants from flower week 1, 2, 3 etc ?!? Though you are experimenting with crop steering?You are wrong. Everybody here judges most aspects of crop success without a lab report.
You are wrong. I have (on occasion) lab analysis done every week, with that moving to every 3 days through transition. I will show you mine, when you show me yours. However it's only anecdotal still, and you don't think for yourself. Or you missed a word, in that story of me making a mess with words. I don't really care which. I think you finish with trying to read the future though. Which demonstrates your ability to look at the evidence and make a decision.
I realise you are blinkered, but I hope other people can see there is actually a topic known as crop steering. It puts an umbrella over all the things that we do to influence a crop. I don't mean support it while it does what it wants to. I mean the things we do to change it's course. It's a virgin topic, and as such nobody is quite sure what fits into the category. Many hope to find nutritionally focused research under this heading. Such as the very late high K boost some hemp feeds have, or the loading of Ca and P in later veg. Many things we do are passed over from other crops, and while we can see they work, are often for reasons we don't understand. It's not long ago we knew when cannabis would flower, but didn't know if it was the day length or night length that did it. Today, our demands for knowledge are much more in depth. However cannabis research has a spotty history. Only now are we seeing papers piling up on the topics we want to see. However, we are still at NPK on the whole. Other elements have toxicology studies, and deficiency studies done in isolation. However, we don't have the Ca studies we really want yet.
I get that we need this. Other people on the thread get it, and have offered links. The people in this study also give a nod to the fact. Even then though, it will be a study of levels at first. With timing coming in the future. Though we have analysis showing when it's taken, and interestingly, when it's not. Which is later in flower, when issues may develop. However.. you missed the window. You have to load up when you can. These are things that are only proven circumstantially, and even when it does become science fact, facts can be changed as we learn more. It's actually anecdotal evidence that enables us to grow. Which most of us were doing before ever seeing a lab report. Thus, if you think you need a lab report to accept something, you are without reason. And we have seen your reasoning.
I'm not actually sure why you are on this thread. You can't spin a discussion off that study. You can't even recognise one. The chances of you joining the dots to other studies are immeasurable. It's as useless to you, as you are being here. By my reasoning, based on this and other encounters with you, you're just trolling.
That's such an illogical response I don't even know what to respond to this WTF! It is you YOU who brought the topic of crop steering up, not the person you replied to. And the reason for wanting to see your plants is different, unrelated to crop steering. And then to present a rethorical proof that crop steering exists by photoperiodically initiating flowering is also WTF Jesus....If you don't want to believe in crop steering, that is fine. However, I draw your attention to your own use of 12/12 to initiate flowering, and suggest you don't need pics of my crop to believe in steering.
Dood. I see a notification you have quoted me, and my heart sinks. It's always the same. Some disagreement because you don't understand what you read. Your memory is good, and will get you through uni. Everything you add that's original, is generally a mistake though. I have already offered the info I'm not meant to have. I have also explained why it's no use to anyone. In a post you laugh at 5 weeks later, but others love. You are not in the crowd of peers I talk to, or the group that want help. You don't recognise when you are proven wrong. You are blinkered, and as yet, I'm not sure you have ever grown anything decent yourself.So you did tissue sample analysis every 3 days but you cannot show some pics of your plants from flower week 1, 2, 3 etc ?!? Though you are experimenting with crop steering?
I'd really like to see your documentation but you will not publish it as you don't have it. It's just been a defensive move to change the subject when you don't show pics (the status of your plants will give many infos out, and no, noone here wants to locate your IP etc)
That's such an illogical response I don't even know what to respond to this WTF! It is you YOU who brought the topic of crop steering up, not the person you replied to. And the reason for wanting to see your plants is different, unrelated to crop steering. And then to present a rethorical proof that crop steering exists by photoperiodically initiating flowering is also WTF Jesus....
Good entrance.Hey guys, first of all, hello to everyone. This is my first post here, I have been active in other forums before.
Regarding the study from the first post: It has been discussed before, and I took a closer look at it a few days ago and noticed some things. I am particularly critical of the test nutrient solutions and the graphs derived from them.
View attachment 18840724
View attachment 18840723
Basically, GPT also sees the analysis critically.
View attachment 18840725
In addition, with the few data points, we do not even have enough for these three graphs. Some corner point data are missing, which they then interpreted from the 16 test solutions. For example, only one test was carried out with 20 P.
If we now look at other studies (North Carolina and Utah State University), we can see, in my opinion, that phosphorus at 40 or 60 ppm is far too much.
Sustainable Cannabis Nutrition: Elevated root-zone phosphorus significantly increases leachate P and does not improve yield or quality
Hemp Leaf Tissue Nutrient Ranges: Refinement of Reference Standards for Floral Hemp
Utah Hydroponic Solutions
In addition, there are also some very high Ca and Cl values in their tests. Overall, the paper provides, in my opinion, no useful information. There are many nice graphics, but they don't say anything.
Do you all see it the same way when you take a closer look, or did I make a mistake somewhere?