Charles Lynch Sentenced to 1 Year in Federal Prison; Vows to Appeal
Former Morro Bay medical cannabis dispensing collective operator Charles C. Lynch, who's federal case has become an iconic rallying point for medical cannabis supporters frustrated with federal interference in California's medical cannabis laws, was sentenced this week to one year and one day in prison and four years of supervised release. Lynch was convicted in 2008 under the Bush Administration and had been awaiting sentencing under the new Obama Administration. The sentence handed down by federal District Court Judge George H. Wu is considered lenient given that the Justice Department was seeking the mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years. Despite indications from the White House of a new policy on medical cannabis, the Justice Department refused to agree with defense attorneys' contention that Lynch deserved a sentence of time served. Lynch is currently out on bail pending his appeal, but cannot use medical marijuana according to the terms of his release.
"Fortunately, the judge saw through the federal government's argument that Lynch deserved five years in prison, and instead sentenced him to the least amount of time he could," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with the national advocacy group Americans for Safe Access (ASA). "Recognizing that Lynch had not violated any state or local laws, the judge was lenient despite the protestations of the federal government." On two of the counts against Lynch, Judge Wu sentenced him to time served.
During his election campaign, President Obama said that he was "not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws" on cannabis. That was followed up with statements by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that the Justice Department would only "go after those people who violate both federal and state law." These developments prompted Judge Wu to request clarification from the government regarding that policy's impact on Lynch's case. However, a response from the Deputy Attorney General's office explained that his case was unaffected.
Continued raids on medical cannabis dispensing collectives under the Obama Administration has prompted Congress to seek clarification on this new policy. On Tuesday, Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) got report language approved within the Commerce, Justice and Science Departments (CJS) Appropriations bill. "It's imperative that the federal government respect states' rights and stay out of the way of patients with debilitating diseases such as cancer who are using medical marijuana in accordance with state law to alleviate their pain," said Hinchey in a press release issued Tuesday.
"We applaud Congressman Hinchey's leadership on this issue and his attempt to restrict interference by the federal government in medical marijuana states," said Caren Woodson, ASA's Director of Government Affairs.
There are more than two dozen pending federal cases like Lynch's for which the government has failed to signal any change in strategy. Advocates contend that the federal government should either cease such prosecutions or , at the very least, remove the cases to state court where medical evidence can properly be heard. Because of the June 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Gonzales v. Raich, federal medical cannabis defendants are prohibited from entering evidence related to medical cannabis or their compliance with local and state laws. Advocates argue that the exclusion of evidence is the reason why Lynch and others are being convicted in federal court.
Before his dispensing collective was raided by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents in March of 2007, Lynch had operated for 11 months without incident, and with the blessing of the Morro Bay City Council, the local Chamber of Commerce, and other community members. Two months after Lynch closed his dispensary, Central Coast Compassionate Caregivers, he was indicted and charged with conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute marijuana and concentrated cannabis, manufacturing more than 100 plants, knowingly maintaining a drug premises, and sales of marijuana to a person under the age of 21. None of the federal charges Lynch was convicted of constituted violations of local or state law.
Courtesy ASA
Former Morro Bay medical cannabis dispensing collective operator Charles C. Lynch, who's federal case has become an iconic rallying point for medical cannabis supporters frustrated with federal interference in California's medical cannabis laws, was sentenced this week to one year and one day in prison and four years of supervised release. Lynch was convicted in 2008 under the Bush Administration and had been awaiting sentencing under the new Obama Administration. The sentence handed down by federal District Court Judge George H. Wu is considered lenient given that the Justice Department was seeking the mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years. Despite indications from the White House of a new policy on medical cannabis, the Justice Department refused to agree with defense attorneys' contention that Lynch deserved a sentence of time served. Lynch is currently out on bail pending his appeal, but cannot use medical marijuana according to the terms of his release.
"Fortunately, the judge saw through the federal government's argument that Lynch deserved five years in prison, and instead sentenced him to the least amount of time he could," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with the national advocacy group Americans for Safe Access (ASA). "Recognizing that Lynch had not violated any state or local laws, the judge was lenient despite the protestations of the federal government." On two of the counts against Lynch, Judge Wu sentenced him to time served.
During his election campaign, President Obama said that he was "not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws" on cannabis. That was followed up with statements by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that the Justice Department would only "go after those people who violate both federal and state law." These developments prompted Judge Wu to request clarification from the government regarding that policy's impact on Lynch's case. However, a response from the Deputy Attorney General's office explained that his case was unaffected.
Continued raids on medical cannabis dispensing collectives under the Obama Administration has prompted Congress to seek clarification on this new policy. On Tuesday, Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) got report language approved within the Commerce, Justice and Science Departments (CJS) Appropriations bill. "It's imperative that the federal government respect states' rights and stay out of the way of patients with debilitating diseases such as cancer who are using medical marijuana in accordance with state law to alleviate their pain," said Hinchey in a press release issued Tuesday.
"We applaud Congressman Hinchey's leadership on this issue and his attempt to restrict interference by the federal government in medical marijuana states," said Caren Woodson, ASA's Director of Government Affairs.
There are more than two dozen pending federal cases like Lynch's for which the government has failed to signal any change in strategy. Advocates contend that the federal government should either cease such prosecutions or , at the very least, remove the cases to state court where medical evidence can properly be heard. Because of the June 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Gonzales v. Raich, federal medical cannabis defendants are prohibited from entering evidence related to medical cannabis or their compliance with local and state laws. Advocates argue that the exclusion of evidence is the reason why Lynch and others are being convicted in federal court.
Before his dispensing collective was raided by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents in March of 2007, Lynch had operated for 11 months without incident, and with the blessing of the Morro Bay City Council, the local Chamber of Commerce, and other community members. Two months after Lynch closed his dispensary, Central Coast Compassionate Caregivers, he was indicted and charged with conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute marijuana and concentrated cannabis, manufacturing more than 100 plants, knowingly maintaining a drug premises, and sales of marijuana to a person under the age of 21. None of the federal charges Lynch was convicted of constituted violations of local or state law.
Courtesy ASA
