If you're speaking of the 1st amendment, that is guaranteed by the government. The government can't stop you from saying what you want. Parler and Twitter and PRIVATE companies. You operate under THEIR terms of service. Then enforcing their rules is not draconian.
Imagine Parler/Twitter is a christian bakery and Trump is a gay wedding cake.
The people who will be prosecuted will be innocent peacefull people who were waved to enter by the police. The Antifa members dressed as Trump supporters were there to create and document the media narrative and create a cheap excuse for Deep State republicans to vote against investigating election fraud.
As an experienced action photographer and strategic thinker, I can easily sea that the photo was choreograpghed to maximize it's propaganda value.
I remember having to get a tb test to work in a restaurant. Didn’t see the big deal.
This is why section 230 protections must be taken away. Your analogy is way off here. Here's why; A publisher can select who or what they want to publish and say anything they want, including outright lies. However, if those lies are shown to be harmful in some way to someone, then, that 'someone' can sue for slander and if they can prove that it was slander and false, they can potentially sue a publisher out of existance depending on the cost of those damages.
Big tech is not supposed to be operating as a publisher (editing content and censoring). They are (under section 230) considered a public common good and are thus granted immunity from slander suits. When this is all done they will be sued out of existance.
The wedding cake guy is different because it is a custom artistry. So, if he has to make a "gay wedding cake" then what is to stop a neo nazi from ordering a hitler birthday cake from a jewish artisan bakery. You can't force someone to make something, ever. That person offered them any generic cake that they wanted. I love gay people and I love cake, but that guy was right in my opinion. He even said that he loves gay people, it was just that he didn't want to worry about pissing god off over bible interpretations. I'm not religious myself, but that guy was a very nice guy and clearly was not a homophobe in the least. He was a 'God-phobe.'
This is why section 230 protections must be taken away. Your analogy is way off here. Here's why; A publisher can select who or what they want to publish and say anything they want, including outright lies. However, if those lies are shown to be harmful in some way to someone, then, that 'someone' can sue for slander and if they can prove that it was slander and false, they can potentially sue a publisher out of existance depending on the cost of those damages.
Big tech is not supposed to be operating as a publisher (editing content and censoring). They are (under section 230) considered a public common good and are thus granted immunity from slander suits. When this is all done they will be sued out of existance.
The wedding cake guy is different because it is a custom artistry. So, if he has to make a "gay wedding cake" then what is to stop a neo nazi from ordering a hitler birthday cake from a jewish artisan bakery. You can't force someone to make something, ever. That person offered them any generic cake that they wanted. I love gay people and I love cake, but that guy was right in my opinion. He even said that he loves gay people, it was just that he didn't want to worry about pissing god off over bible interpretations. I'm not religious myself, but that guy was a very nice guy and clearly was not a homophobe in the least. He was a 'God-phobe.'
He was just trying to get back to the hotel with his mom so that she could feed him his chicken tendies.
That's where he was found and interviewed. At the four seasons.
The optics won't be good for him when they arrest him.
View Image
Remember this Hempy?
Why weren't you concerned about peoples rights?
View Image
View Image
View Image
The people who will be prosecuted will be innocent peacefull people who were waved to enter by the police. The Antifa members dressed as Trump supporters were there to create and document the media narrative and create a cheap excuse for Deep State republicans to vote against investigating election fraud.
As an experienced action photographer and strategic thinker, I can easily sea that the photo was choreograpghed to maximize it's propaganda value.
All those Hotel videos of check ins, Phone footprints, Facebook vids.
I'm thinking 20 years is about right. Any involved government employees should loose all benefits.
View Image
what's funny is there's more proof to this being true than any Q or Trump theory about pretty much anything.Do you think ANTIFA caused the fires in "Democrat run cities" You do?!? But....but.....what if they were Trump supporters dressed as ANTIFA
There is a vast difference between protestors and what we saw last week,
what's funny is there's more proof to this being true than any Q or Trump theory about pretty much anything.
But no problem with Antifa death squads roaming the streets and burning down black neighborhoods and businesses. Oh, but when they go to where the politicians work, suddenly you are so pro establishment. Weren't most of you hypocrites just talking about revolution and beheading the politicians and destroying public property and supporting violence in the name of the phantom menace that is 'white supremacy in America?'
imagine being a trump supporting policeman just to get your face bashed in with a fire extinguisher from a trump supporter
The seditious acts involving violence and/or destruction of property were in many cases documented in videos and pics.
For example, the Alex Jones interview of the QDude with the horns showed videos that included one where a seditionist used a sharp ended flag stick and stabbed a capital police officer in the head.
It should be relatively easy to track that asswipe down and try him for sedition and assault of a LEO.
antifa isn't intolerant though. they're only intolerant to fascists, fascist sympathizers, and fascist apologists lol. so if you view them as intolerant then perhaps............................................. fill in the blank.
Amazing isn't it....
Nazis: were terrible people who think we're the master race and we should stand on and oppress those who we deem lesser than us.
Antifa: yeah fuck that, you can fuck off
Nazis: wow so much for the tolerant left
Hannity and other idiots - "this division must end. biden must unify with the republicans"
republicans -
View Image