EDIT: I just noticed the date on this, but I hadn't heard of it before.
http://m.lawrence.com/news/2006/sep/15/police_used_hightech_surveillance_festival/?templates=mobile
Story by Eric Weslander
Hidden, high-dollar equipment helped police crack down on drug dealing at this year's Wakarusa Festival.
A new article in a trade journal, Government Security News, describes the roughly $250,000 worth of hidden-camera, night-vision and thermal-imaging equipment used by police throughout the festival grounds. The equipment was courtesy of a California company that agreed to give a free demonstration of its wares for marketing purposes.
The company estimated that they were able to cover 85 percent of the festival grounds with about a half dozen hidden cameras. One camera, for example, was mounted atop a light tower and used on "Shakedown Street," a bustling area viewed as a problem spot for drug dealing.
"It's hopefully a win-win for everybody except the crooks," said Mike McRory, vice president of business development for NS Microwave Inc., of Spring Valley, Calif., which markets security and surveillance equipment and is owned by the defense contractor Allied Defense Group.
The company builds "covert" cameras disguised as everything from electrical boxes to birdhouses. They're capable of seeing at night as long as there's some ambient light nearby such as a lantern or fire.
'Nobody knew'
Four of its cameras were "consistently deployed" throughout the festival, and at least two others were there to be used as needed, according to the company. The cameras were controlled by a computerized command center in a 21-foot trailer that was parked atop a hill in the middle of a Frisbee golf course inside the park.
"Nobody knew," said Kevin Danciak, the company's Midwestern sales representative. "It just looked like parabolic dishes on top of a trailer."
The plan to use the cameras came about when Danciak ran into Clinton State Park manager Jerry Schecher at a Kansas narcotics officers' meeting early this year or late last year. Danciak was there to promote his equipment. Schecher was looking for answers to growing concerns about drug dealing at the festival, which was heading into its third year and was growing in popularity.
Had there not been a strong move this year by law enforcement to control the situation, Schecher said, the state would not have allowed the festival to continue.
"This is a crowd that has a high expectation of privacy and freedom, and I respect that, within limits," Schecher said. "I struggled with this a little bit, but I felt like we were doing it for the right reasons. If it was meant to be Big Brother and spying on people, I wouldn't have done it."
One festivalgoer said the hidden cameras were "a shame and kind of embarrassing.
"I feel like it was really a big mistake because people at a festival are trying to have a good time and let loose. I would be willing to bet that most people wouldn't be OK with that had they known," Ali Mangan said.
She said law enforcement should have at leased publicized the hidden cameras. The surveillance was conducted at the expense of the privacy of people not selling drugs, Mangan said.
Safer means
The main things the cameras captured, Danciak said, were hand-to-hand drug transactions and drug use. After zooming into an area where drug sales were happening, police could then send an officer in to make an undercover buy that was caught on camera.
"We could see if there was a problem and then address it rather than just having to focus all of our foot patrols or enforcement in that area all of the time," Schecher said.
Danciak said the result was a safer way of busting drug deals.
"No fighting, no running, no guns drawn, nothing," he said. "It was just, 'You pop around the corner, you're there, you identify yourself and you see people just deflate.'"
He declined comment on whether the cameras covered the festival stage areas or campground areas outside the festival.
At least a month before the festival began, Schecher said, promoter Brett Mosiman was notified of the plan for security cameras. Mosiman did not return phone calls Thursday seeking comment.
The cameras' presence was not publicized in the Lawrence area before or after the festival.
The article in Government Security News said the images produced were so good that some alleged dealers entered pleas based on the strength of that evidence. But Dist. Atty. Charles Branson, whose office is charged with prosecuting the cases, said he did not know of any cases in which that happened.
Many of those arrested at the festival were allowed to plead to lower charges in a massive docket call a few days after the hearing.
Police seized more than $11,000 in suspected drug money, but some of that came outside the festival grounds in a Kansas Highway Patrol checkpoint.
Lt. Kari Wempe, of the Douglas County Sheriff's Office, the lead agency at the festival, said the camera system worked well.
"It gave a good overall aerial view of the grounds, which we would not have had otherwise," she said.
But so far, she said, the sheriff has no plans to buy any of the company's equipment. Schecher said he would like to use a similar system at the park in the future, perhaps for catching people who try to break into pay stations, but not necessarily for next year's festival.
"Kevin has nice toys, but they're expensive," he said.
http://m.lawrence.com/news/2006/sep/15/police_used_hightech_surveillance_festival/?templates=mobile
Story by Eric Weslander
Hidden, high-dollar equipment helped police crack down on drug dealing at this year's Wakarusa Festival.
A new article in a trade journal, Government Security News, describes the roughly $250,000 worth of hidden-camera, night-vision and thermal-imaging equipment used by police throughout the festival grounds. The equipment was courtesy of a California company that agreed to give a free demonstration of its wares for marketing purposes.
The company estimated that they were able to cover 85 percent of the festival grounds with about a half dozen hidden cameras. One camera, for example, was mounted atop a light tower and used on "Shakedown Street," a bustling area viewed as a problem spot for drug dealing.
"It's hopefully a win-win for everybody except the crooks," said Mike McRory, vice president of business development for NS Microwave Inc., of Spring Valley, Calif., which markets security and surveillance equipment and is owned by the defense contractor Allied Defense Group.
The company builds "covert" cameras disguised as everything from electrical boxes to birdhouses. They're capable of seeing at night as long as there's some ambient light nearby such as a lantern or fire.
'Nobody knew'
Four of its cameras were "consistently deployed" throughout the festival, and at least two others were there to be used as needed, according to the company. The cameras were controlled by a computerized command center in a 21-foot trailer that was parked atop a hill in the middle of a Frisbee golf course inside the park.
"Nobody knew," said Kevin Danciak, the company's Midwestern sales representative. "It just looked like parabolic dishes on top of a trailer."
The plan to use the cameras came about when Danciak ran into Clinton State Park manager Jerry Schecher at a Kansas narcotics officers' meeting early this year or late last year. Danciak was there to promote his equipment. Schecher was looking for answers to growing concerns about drug dealing at the festival, which was heading into its third year and was growing in popularity.
Had there not been a strong move this year by law enforcement to control the situation, Schecher said, the state would not have allowed the festival to continue.
"This is a crowd that has a high expectation of privacy and freedom, and I respect that, within limits," Schecher said. "I struggled with this a little bit, but I felt like we were doing it for the right reasons. If it was meant to be Big Brother and spying on people, I wouldn't have done it."
One festivalgoer said the hidden cameras were "a shame and kind of embarrassing.
"I feel like it was really a big mistake because people at a festival are trying to have a good time and let loose. I would be willing to bet that most people wouldn't be OK with that had they known," Ali Mangan said.
She said law enforcement should have at leased publicized the hidden cameras. The surveillance was conducted at the expense of the privacy of people not selling drugs, Mangan said.
Safer means
The main things the cameras captured, Danciak said, were hand-to-hand drug transactions and drug use. After zooming into an area where drug sales were happening, police could then send an officer in to make an undercover buy that was caught on camera.
"We could see if there was a problem and then address it rather than just having to focus all of our foot patrols or enforcement in that area all of the time," Schecher said.
Danciak said the result was a safer way of busting drug deals.
"No fighting, no running, no guns drawn, nothing," he said. "It was just, 'You pop around the corner, you're there, you identify yourself and you see people just deflate.'"
He declined comment on whether the cameras covered the festival stage areas or campground areas outside the festival.
At least a month before the festival began, Schecher said, promoter Brett Mosiman was notified of the plan for security cameras. Mosiman did not return phone calls Thursday seeking comment.
The cameras' presence was not publicized in the Lawrence area before or after the festival.
The article in Government Security News said the images produced were so good that some alleged dealers entered pleas based on the strength of that evidence. But Dist. Atty. Charles Branson, whose office is charged with prosecuting the cases, said he did not know of any cases in which that happened.
Many of those arrested at the festival were allowed to plead to lower charges in a massive docket call a few days after the hearing.
Police seized more than $11,000 in suspected drug money, but some of that came outside the festival grounds in a Kansas Highway Patrol checkpoint.
Lt. Kari Wempe, of the Douglas County Sheriff's Office, the lead agency at the festival, said the camera system worked well.
"It gave a good overall aerial view of the grounds, which we would not have had otherwise," she said.
But so far, she said, the sheriff has no plans to buy any of the company's equipment. Schecher said he would like to use a similar system at the park in the future, perhaps for catching people who try to break into pay stations, but not necessarily for next year's festival.
"Kevin has nice toys, but they're expensive," he said.
