We weren't talking something you said weeks before, the exchange this is a continuation of was referring to the previous exchange. Sure nobody remembers all of their post but hopefully they remember the last thing they said to a person. Oh and newsflash, when you tell someone their opinion is stupid, crazy, the result of mental illness or complete bullshit that's an insult. A point that you conspiracy theorists have been making throughout this thread. In fact that very notion is the premise for the topic of the thread. There would be no need to make the case that being a conspiracy theorist is actually a sign of mental health if people didn't feel being called a conspiracy theorist was insulting and dismissive of their opinion.
Yeah like there is a canceled check someone has from Osama where in the memo section it says "Terrorist Attack" I'm talking the official story and you damn well know that. I like you am just an ordinary citizen who is not going to have access to whatever proof that Osama funded things available to them to offer up as proof. Maybe 10 or 20 years from now it might be available after it's been declassified, although it probably won't do much good because most of it will be blacked out with marker ink. But see I'm not the one who needs to prove things here. I'm not the one making the claim that the official story is fabricated, that would be you and so the burden is on you to prove your claims. Which you haven't in the slightest. Saying you've read the opinions of 1500 people proves zip other then that you can read and 1500 people out of hundreds of thousand perhaps million of pilots, first responders, demolitionists, etc, who may or may not be qualified to disput the official story, also have the opinion the official story is false. Which doesn't even begin to come close to being proof.
You apparently have no clue of how establishing theory works. You form an explaination to explain something and then seek to prove it. You don't just say "This is what I think and I think I'm right" and then demand anyone saying you are not right, prove you wrong.
You can't because there isn't and just because some Saudis and one Pakistan general might have been the ones to send the funds doesn't mean it was their funds they were sending. Most people financing things like secret terrorist operation aren't likely to be cutting checks or even handing out cash themselves. Financing things doesn't mean you're the one sending the money. You also seem to lack an understanding of how middle easterners transfer money when they're trying to fly under the radar it's called Hawala and has been used to transfer money discreetly since medieval times. So to look for paper evidence of a money trail for 9/11 would be a waste of time.
That's not what I said though, not even close. What I said was we knew that they were interested in using hijacked commercial planes as weapons but the Bush administration dismissed it as unlikely to happen because he didn't feel the people expressing this interest would be likely to pull it off given the current protections in place at the time to prevent hijackings. I never said they knew that they were going to hit the towers on 9/11.
And your proof they were training those scenarios regularly? Of course Bush would go on record at the time as saying no one could ever imagine it. Do you really think he would be likely to admit to the American people that he actually knew before 9/11 that terrorists were looking into using hijacked commercial jets as weapons? Where are the critical thinking skills in that that you conspiracy theorists are so found of bragging about having?
Hey when you are being disingenuous and I point it out, that's not taking a cheap shot or making disparaging comments. No a good example of making a disparaging comment rather then discussing facts is the last line above where you imply I don't know the official version. You're not discussing fact there, you're once again expressing opinion of my opinion rather then proving your claims.
