Cognitive dissonance is what your pointing out gaiusmarius.lets try not to make this a fight. i understand peoples frustration at some of these dismissive posts with nothing but the posters say so to back them up, specially when one has taken the time to post things that would answer every one of the issues raised.
i could take your posts S4L and answer point for point, but when you say you try and stay up to date, it just isn't true is it, otherwise you'd be looking at the information posted. when you told TR that you didnt waste your time with 1 of his links you basically made your opinion valueless. how can you form an opinion without studying both sides of an issue?
your idea that the weight of the buildings load and the placement of the furniture made all the difference is really quit funny, because there is no way that would explain the way those buildings fell down so fast. but it also ignores the turning to dust a huge part of the structure. and the hundreds of witnesses talking about explosions and detonations inside the building.
anyway, seems to me you will not be studying this as your mind is made up and you said yourself you won't bother, so to me it looks like i'm being more logical about things, i'm prepared to look at any evidence you'd like to show me, in fact i still want to see pics with the wreck of a 757 on the pentagon lawn.
Cognitive dissonance is what your pointing out gaiusmarius.
In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the excessive mental stress and discomfort experienced by an individual who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values at the same time.
i can't overstate how important blackmail is in this context. it is the #1 tool to bring politicians and businessmen to do your bidding.Social engineering as applied to security is the exploitation of various social and psychological weaknesses in individuals and business structures, sometimes for penetration testing but more often for nefarious purposes, such as espionage against businesses, agencies, and individuals, typically toward the end of obtaining some illegal gain, either of useful but restricted or private information or for monetary gain through such methods as to obtain banking account access, or for purposes of identity theft, blackmail, and so forth. Exploitation of weaknesses caused by inducing cognitive dissonance in targets is one of the techniques used by perpetrators.
yes. this is very important, because it is one of the key mechanisms with which the masses are kept under control.
ever wonder why fox news preaches conservatism but has the raciest shows? same goes for church, government, etc. they constantly induce cognitive dissonance in us.
from wiki:
this is also quite revealing:
i can't overstate how important blackmail is in this context. it is the #1 tool to bring politicians and businessmen to do your bidding.
works like this: DC cocktail party -> send underage (but older looking) hooker to wait for the target in his hotel room after the party -> record and file for future use.
easy as fucking pie...
lets try not to make this a fight. i understand peoples frustration at some of these dismissive posts with nothing but the posters say so to back them up, specially when one has taken the time to post things that would answer every one of the issues raised.
i could take your posts S4L and answer point for point, but when you say you try and stay up to date, it just isn't true is it, otherwise you'd be looking at the information posted. when you told TR that you didnt waste your time with 1 of his links you basically made your opinion valueless. how can you form an opinion without studying both sides of an issue?S4L said:I opened the first link to see it was a 1987 senate hearing about Oliver North, I decided then & there that the rest of his links would also be as relevant to 9/11 as well. that and I don't need any friggin' history lessons either, I know the govt lies to us continually.
your idea that the weight of the buildings load and the placement of the furniture made all the difference is really quit funny, because there is no way that would explain the way those buildings fell down so fast. but it also ignores the turning to dust a huge part of the structure. and the hundreds of witnesses talking about explosions and detonations inside the building.S4L said:No skyscraper in history (never mind one of the worlds largest) has ever been taken down while being 100% fully occupied, so how could you really know what effect would be caused? you're denying/dismissing my theory without providing a bit of fact, and you do it trying to sound as if you'd even know something about it. does that sound familiar gaius??? kinda hypocritical.
anyway, seems to me you will not be studying this as your mind is made up and you said yourself you won't bother, so to me it looks like i'm being more logical about things, i'm prepared to look at any evidence you'd like to show me, in fact i still want to see pics with the wreck of a 757 on the pentagon lawn.S4L said:there wasn't a lot of large recognizable airliner debris scattered around the penetrated side of the towers either.
AGAIN gaius, line up the surviving family members of the victims of Flight 77 and explain your side to them, looking in their eyes what would you tell them happened that day?