I simply could not find any info anywhere on my question. Looking for your experience.
I seeded a healthy-looking female at 8 weeks, three weeks into flower. She is Chrystal from Nirvana Seeds. The male was a very vigorous multi-plenti-pollinator.
Chrystal developed beautifully, strong, nice compact pheno, no problems. A beauty to behold. Chrystal at its finest. Until the heat when she was 4 -5 weeks into flowering. Then the nanners. But I jump ahead.
Now Chystal had two sisters, relevant here only as comparisons. Sister 1 was my top favorite of the three plants in terms of growth potential and formation. Sister 2 was my number two choice. The first turned completely hermie after the heat wave in July. Ergo chop Sister 1. "Served her right," thought Chrystal secretly to herself. He-he.
Now I seeded both Chrystal and Sister 2 BEFORE the heat. I left Chrystal to flower because only one of her many branches was pollinated (pollen in bag method). But Sister 2 was fully, and I mean fully and completely, pollinated at 3 weeks into flower. Sister 2 was vigorous and continued to flower a little even after pollination, but that soon faded and she produced 500 seeds and more. The seeds are now fully developed and look good, nice and dark and stripey, but I'm getting ahead again.
When the heat came (after pollination), it produced a hermie in one plant, Sister 1, and, on Chrystal, a male seed pod appeared in week 6 and then more and more little nanners in later flowering, week 8-9. Sister 2 (fully dedicated to seeds) never showed any male flower growth at all. She was fully occupied making seeds to flower any more.
So I have seeds from a plant dedicated exclusively to seeds, and I have seeds from a plant that was only partly pollinated and later produced nanners. Both plants were pollinated and seeds had fully formed before the heat.
Nanners are said to be a sign of genetic instability. This leaves me wondering which seeds, if any, might be usable.
Are seeds pollinated and set before the stress occurs somehow insulated from the hermaphroditism caused by heat stress? Does the fact that a plant has gone fully to seed protect its genetics from damage that might occur from moderate heat stress?
I break that question down now into two parts. Are my seeds from Chrystal more likely to be tainted than from Sister 2? That was my thought at first, but it could also be a straight yes or no situation.
As for Sister 2, does that fact that a plant is not flowering and has fully gone to seed afford the seeds, when they are already set and fully formed, some kind of protection against genetic damage from heat stress?
So my question is:Are seeds, once set, protected or insulated from moderate stress?
Given the choice, which of my plants' seeds would you use next year: Seeds from the plant that had nanners from heat stress occuring after pollination, or seeds from the plant that was taken out of the flowering business at a young vigorous age before the stress occurred and quite simply produced no more flowers?
Thanks for your experiences.
I seeded a healthy-looking female at 8 weeks, three weeks into flower. She is Chrystal from Nirvana Seeds. The male was a very vigorous multi-plenti-pollinator.
Chrystal developed beautifully, strong, nice compact pheno, no problems. A beauty to behold. Chrystal at its finest. Until the heat when she was 4 -5 weeks into flowering. Then the nanners. But I jump ahead.
Now Chystal had two sisters, relevant here only as comparisons. Sister 1 was my top favorite of the three plants in terms of growth potential and formation. Sister 2 was my number two choice. The first turned completely hermie after the heat wave in July. Ergo chop Sister 1. "Served her right," thought Chrystal secretly to herself. He-he.
Now I seeded both Chrystal and Sister 2 BEFORE the heat. I left Chrystal to flower because only one of her many branches was pollinated (pollen in bag method). But Sister 2 was fully, and I mean fully and completely, pollinated at 3 weeks into flower. Sister 2 was vigorous and continued to flower a little even after pollination, but that soon faded and she produced 500 seeds and more. The seeds are now fully developed and look good, nice and dark and stripey, but I'm getting ahead again.
When the heat came (after pollination), it produced a hermie in one plant, Sister 1, and, on Chrystal, a male seed pod appeared in week 6 and then more and more little nanners in later flowering, week 8-9. Sister 2 (fully dedicated to seeds) never showed any male flower growth at all. She was fully occupied making seeds to flower any more.
So I have seeds from a plant dedicated exclusively to seeds, and I have seeds from a plant that was only partly pollinated and later produced nanners. Both plants were pollinated and seeds had fully formed before the heat.
Nanners are said to be a sign of genetic instability. This leaves me wondering which seeds, if any, might be usable.
Are seeds pollinated and set before the stress occurs somehow insulated from the hermaphroditism caused by heat stress? Does the fact that a plant has gone fully to seed protect its genetics from damage that might occur from moderate heat stress?
I break that question down now into two parts. Are my seeds from Chrystal more likely to be tainted than from Sister 2? That was my thought at first, but it could also be a straight yes or no situation.
As for Sister 2, does that fact that a plant is not flowering and has fully gone to seed afford the seeds, when they are already set and fully formed, some kind of protection against genetic damage from heat stress?
So my question is:Are seeds, once set, protected or insulated from moderate stress?
Given the choice, which of my plants' seeds would you use next year: Seeds from the plant that had nanners from heat stress occuring after pollination, or seeds from the plant that was taken out of the flowering business at a young vigorous age before the stress occurred and quite simply produced no more flowers?
Thanks for your experiences.