What happenned to the 1969 Skunk if Fester's is a '79 Skunk?The 79 plant, and the Sk18 have the EXACT same Phyols Report, of which I didn't know, and never researched, but confirms the 79 Sk1, and Sk18 are the same plant, and thanks for the info.
But the Phylos tests determines Parentage. Sk1/Sk18 has 000000 Modern Genetic Parental Genetics.
And it tests exactly as the 79 Gold Cost genetics Sk1.
BTW.
Phlyos doesn't show genetic relative-link from Fester's sample to any of the three 1979 Skunk samples, further prooving Phylos isn't working as it's supposed to, if one of the 1979 Skunk samples is the same plant as this Fester's.
-
-
Refferring to your other posts
So, now it's no MODERN relatives, instead of a Phylos-guy telling on a forum it has NO RELATIVES at all on the Phylos database.
..from 1969 to 79. etc. yea
At least you can be happy it doesn't have any Cookies in it ay.
Why don't you just drop this Fester's fantasy skunk nonsense and admit that the only thing these people got is perhaps old Skunk genetics originating from Sam Skunkman
..and that all this pre-Sam Skunk is just bullshit.
PS.
Have you actually asked Sam Skunkman when he made the Skunk 18-generation, cause he gave Nevil seeds from the 18.2-generation?
The 7.1-generation seeds he also gave to Nevil must be pre-Fester's Skunk then.
[FONT="]https://www.mrnice.nl/forum/70804-post15.html[/FONT]Nevil said:I bought Sams skunk and Sam was part of that group. The first line was a 7.1 line, I later got the 18.2 line and I think there was another line after 18.2. The last versions were much better. I'd worked on the last line of Sk1 for 5 or 6 gens. It was leagues ahead of the early stuff. I crossed this with AfgT. It was the best SS yet. SB got that stuff. I expect that it's in much of what your smoking these days (skunk wise).
N.