sirripalot
Member
man, hoosier. i want to call you out and see what your response is.
the first thing: your comments on how inefficient it is to use your house air for intake instead of a "lung room". i don't want to pull high RH, cold air from outside, when i have low RH, still pretty cool air inside. or what about when it's hot as hell outside, why would i want to pull hot ass air over my condensors? also, i dont have the capabilities to do so (exhaust OR intake air from outside).
i want to make a point that generally saying using your house air is inefficient is inaccurate because it's not 100% the case. for example, i'm actually HEATING my house with the heat output from the a/c unit in my grow. so obviously using the air from within my house is NOT inefficient, or am i wrong?
obviously if i were running my A/C inside, it would be wasteful to use that cold air for the grow room A/C, but my question is..is it that serious? what type of electricity usage are you talking across a month, 10-20 bucks?
my point is, i think you need to make it more clear when you're saying not to do things that it's totally feasible to do so in certain situations, it's a little misleading.
the same for having two separate chambers (one for ambient, one for exhaust) vs having ONE chamber, with both an exhaust/intake to keep constant flow to the A/C. do you actually have any data to backup what you're saying is, or is "ask an hvac man" you're only backup?
i'm very tempted to build two small chambers, same A/C one with one chamber box, another with two chamber box, to prove you wrong.
i think i'm going to stick with my one chamber as it's much more practical, and has been running smooth as a mother fucker for weeks now.
now if my A/C breaks in a month i'll be holding my tongue!
convince me otherwise, please.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR, I AM NOT ARGUING THE POINT THAT TWO CHAMBERS IS MORE EFFICIENT AS THAT IS FAIRLY OBVIOUS. I JUST WANT TO DECIDE THE EASE OF BUILDING vs EFFICIENCY, which one outweights the other.
the first thing: your comments on how inefficient it is to use your house air for intake instead of a "lung room". i don't want to pull high RH, cold air from outside, when i have low RH, still pretty cool air inside. or what about when it's hot as hell outside, why would i want to pull hot ass air over my condensors? also, i dont have the capabilities to do so (exhaust OR intake air from outside).
i want to make a point that generally saying using your house air is inefficient is inaccurate because it's not 100% the case. for example, i'm actually HEATING my house with the heat output from the a/c unit in my grow. so obviously using the air from within my house is NOT inefficient, or am i wrong?
obviously if i were running my A/C inside, it would be wasteful to use that cold air for the grow room A/C, but my question is..is it that serious? what type of electricity usage are you talking across a month, 10-20 bucks?
my point is, i think you need to make it more clear when you're saying not to do things that it's totally feasible to do so in certain situations, it's a little misleading.
the same for having two separate chambers (one for ambient, one for exhaust) vs having ONE chamber, with both an exhaust/intake to keep constant flow to the A/C. do you actually have any data to backup what you're saying is, or is "ask an hvac man" you're only backup?
i'm very tempted to build two small chambers, same A/C one with one chamber box, another with two chamber box, to prove you wrong.
i think i'm going to stick with my one chamber as it's much more practical, and has been running smooth as a mother fucker for weeks now.
now if my A/C breaks in a month i'll be holding my tongue!
convince me otherwise, please.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR, I AM NOT ARGUING THE POINT THAT TWO CHAMBERS IS MORE EFFICIENT AS THAT IS FAIRLY OBVIOUS. I JUST WANT TO DECIDE THE EASE OF BUILDING vs EFFICIENCY, which one outweights the other.