Z
Zoolander
LED can't compete with HPS for flower . I run UFO's in veg and they are great for mothers and clones but stick to HPS for flower .
what issues have you had w/ conversion bulbs?On second thought you would need to use conversion lamps which are shit especially in high wattage like that
hortilux eye ulta aceConversion bulbs are hella expensive for one.
you obviously havnt used a 940 eye conversion bulb (2k)... they are very effective...Lazyman said:Ok, ignoring PAR watts for brevity, we'll use the easily-found lumens ratings for the comparisons.
Conversion bulbs have dramatically reduced lumens compared to their "standard" counterparts, the Sunmaster 600w MH conversion bulb only spits out 50K lumens (a standard HPS is between 80-90K dep on manufacturer.) That is 83.33 lumens per watt.
IMHO Conversion bulbs are pretty inappropriate for a flowering bulb, as they are less efficient than a regular 400w, which is are a waste of power for a veg bulb (a Solarmax 7200K 400W MH puts out 36K lumens, or 90 lumens per watt.) Sad if a 400w mh is more efficient, but even a good fluorescent is more efficient than a 600w conversion bulb!
An 8-bulb T-5 takes 432w, but puts out 40K lumens, or 92.59 lumens per watt. Newer LED panels (like the 318w Penetrator LED panel) makes "nearly" 12000 lumens, which is 37.7 lumens per watt, in case you're curious.
Should I start a lighting thread or do you guys know all this shit already?
conversion bulbs are overlooked, but that is ok... those that have used them for many 360's know what they will do for final fruit... which is all that matters. they technically could replace mh's in the garden, except for the greater uv & violet light that mh's put out...the best unit for expressing the energy requirement of a specific plant species is the irradiance expressed in milliwatts per sqaure meter or milliwatts per square foot(mw/m2,mw/ft2). it is the measure of the quantity of energy in wavelength band 400-700 nanometers(nm) received by the plants.